| === jono is now known as Guest11562 | ||
| === sunweave1 is now known as sunweaver | ||
| === jono is now known as Guest60019 | ||
| ePierre | Hi everyone! | 10:43 |
|---|---|---|
| ePierre | I'm working in the Checkbox team <https://launchpad.net/checkbox-project> and we just raised two issues to get packages removed from Xenial repositories: pad.lv/1512641 and pad.lv/1512642 ; please let me know if there are anything else I need to do or provide for this to happen. Thanks! | 10:45 |
| Mirv | has anyone running 14.04 LTS been able to workaround bug #1497420 to attach to xenial lxc? | 10:52 |
| ubottu | bug 1497420 in lxc (Ubuntu) "systemd 226 (moving pid 1 into /init.scope cgroup) breaks lxc-attach" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1497420 | 10:52 |
| mardy | seb128: hi! Did you have time to look at https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/446 ? | 11:01 |
| Laney | utlemming / Odd_Bloke / smoser: know when we'll get the first cloud images? | 11:49 |
| * Laney is trying to use adt-buildvm-ubuntu-cloud :) | 11:50 | |
| Odd_Bloke | Laney: We're doing a major rework of how we build images for xenial, so dailies on cloud-images.ubuntu.com aren't imminent. | 11:52 |
| Odd_Bloke | Laney: I did point pitti at some sample images for him to test out, but I don't know that he's managed to get to them yet (I believe he's sprinting this week). | 11:53 |
| === _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
| Laney | Odd_Bloke: OK, thanks, I'll check if a-b-u-c can use those somehow | 12:00 |
| === dpm__ is now known as dpm | ||
| pitti | Odd_Bloke: oh, you did? sorry, missed them | 12:14 |
| pitti | Odd_Bloke: ETA 4 hours, go hotel network :) | 12:22 |
| mgedmin | huh, collectd in debian testing is 5.5.0; collectd in xenial is still 5.4.1 | 12:24 |
| mgedmin | ah, judging from the .ubuntu1 version it needs a merge | 12:31 |
| seb128 | mardy, sorry for the delay, published now | 12:31 |
| mardy | seb128: nw, thanks a lot! :-) | 12:32 |
| mardy | seb128: ah looks like it failed | 12:33 |
| mardy | seb128: packages changed in the archive, let me sync them... | 12:34 |
| seb128 | mardy, if they are no change upload we can override | 12:34 |
| seb128 | but please check if there is content to include | 12:34 |
| mardy | seb128: ok, I'll let you know in a minute | 12:35 |
| === Zic is now known as Guest20486 | ||
| * mgedmin finds and reads https://merges.ubuntu.com/c/collectd/REPORT | 12:37 | |
| mardy | seb128: yes, all three are "no change rebuild" | 12:37 |
| seb128 | mardy, ok, published again with override which worked | 12:40 |
| Odd_Bloke | pitti: :) | 12:44 |
| mardy | seb128: thanks! | 12:47 |
| seb128 | mardy, yw! | 12:48 |
| === Guest20486 is now known as Zic | ||
| === hikiko is now known as hikiko|ln | ||
| === lool- is now known as lool | ||
| === rickspencer3_ is now known as rickspencer3 | ||
| === zul_ is now known as zul | ||
| rbasak | pitti: taking the nis merge to work on with cpaezler. I trust that's OK. | 14:18 |
| pitti | rbasak: please | 14:18 |
| rbasak | Thanks | 14:19 |
| pitti | rbasak: no, thanks to you :) | 14:19 |
| === hikiko|ln is now known as hikiko | ||
| === mwenning is now known as mwenning-wfh | ||
| pitti | Odd_Bloke: http://people.canonical.com/~dwatkins/20151028/ amd image is working fine here! I tested it with local qemu, not with an actual cloud, but I guess you already did that | 14:33 |
| seb128 | what's the way to let britney to let a package through if it reduced the list of archs it's building a binary on? deleting the binary for those archs in the release pocket? | 14:41 |
| cjwatson | seb128: that | 14:46 |
| cjwatson | though obviously check reverse-dependencies first | 14:46 |
| seb128 | right, I just did | 14:46 |
| seb128 | it's for xserver-xorg-video-vmware | 14:47 |
| seb128 | (I hope I didn't overlook thing) | 14:47 |
| seb128 | cjwatson, thanks | 14:47 |
| mardy_ | seb128: the message about the packages being "in the proposed pocket", does it mean that it's all right, or is it an error? https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/446 | 15:03 |
| seb128 | mardy_, it's normal, things go through proposed and migrate when/if they are ok (tests passing, not creating un-installability issue, etc) | 15:04 |
| mardy_ | seb128: ok, thanks | 15:05 |
| seb128 | mardy_, see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ProposedMigration if you are interested by the detailzs | 15:05 |
| ogra_ | cjwatson, infinity, does either of you know how live-build enforces immediate execution of triggers ? (i have a problem installing the raspi2 kernel package during a livefs build, afaik it is 100% based on the -generic package so it should work, yet it defers the update-initramfs trigger, so the postinst fails) https://launchpadlibrarian.net/224109673/buildlog_ubuntu_xenial_armhf_ubuntu-core-system-image_BUILDING.txt.gz | 15:12 |
| ogra_ | the apt.conf manpage only seems to have options to suppress trigger execution | 15:13 |
| TJ- | ogra_: I may be mis-remembering but from a looong way back I seem to recall seeing/using OrderList::Score::Immediate | 15:18 |
| ogra_ | TJ-, hmm, i'll try | 15:18 |
| cjwatson | ogra_: as far as I know, it doesn't | 15:23 |
| ogra_ | weird, so that would be a packaging bug in the raspi2 package ? | 15:24 |
| cjwatson | that would be my first guess | 15:24 |
| ogra_ | hmm and the kernel team is traveling :( | 15:24 |
| cjwatson | deferring triggers isn't really a thing | 15:24 |
| cjwatson | err | 15:24 |
| ogra_ | enforcing :) | 15:24 |
| cjwatson | I mean, enforcing immediate execution of triggers isn't really a thing | 15:24 |
| cjwatson | OrderList::Score::Immediate is a bit different really | 15:25 |
| ogra_ | yeah, thats how i read the manpage | 15:25 |
| Laney | doko: Do you have an idea on how we can get past https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19188 ? | 15:31 |
| ubottu | sourceware.org bug 19188 in ld "[2.26 Regression] binutils assertion fail ../../bfd/elfnn-aarch64.c:4631" [Normal,Assigned] | 15:31 |
| Laney | it's breaking webkit2gtk/arm64 which is going to be the last thing holding up a big-ish migration soon | 15:32 |
| seb128 | hum | 15:43 |
| seb128 | gdb doesn't work on xenial for me :-/ | 15:43 |
| seb128 | (gdb) bt | 15:43 |
| seb128 | Python Exception <class 'SystemError'> <built-in function isinstance> returned a result with an error set: | 15:43 |
| seb128 | those python errors is everything it returns | 15:44 |
| sarnold | seb128: maybe disable autoloading python? https://sourceware.org/gdb/onlinedocs/gdb/Python-Auto_002dloading.html#Python-Auto_002dloading | 15:45 |
| seb128 | sarnold, thanks | 15:45 |
| seb128 | Laney, you could have updated python-pgmagick to 0.5.12 that patch is basically all there is in the new version ;-) (I pinged slangasek about that yesterday) | 15:45 |
| seb128 | sarnold, that works ;-) | 15:46 |
| sarnold | yay :) | 15:46 |
| * Laney shrugs | 15:46 | |
| Laney | why didn't you upload it? | 15:47 |
| seb128 | Laney, because slangasek said it was on his list | 15:47 |
| Laney | didn't see a bug | 15:47 |
| seb128 | he was the one who uploaded the version that failed to build | 15:47 |
| seb128 | yeah, I should probably have opened one | 15:47 |
| seb128 | sorry about that :-) | 15:47 |
| seb128 | I though he would handle it yesterday | 15:47 |
| doko | Laney, sorry, not yet. gold fails too. for unity it only showed up build the test cases, so I proposed to disable these. | 15:47 |
| doko | Laney, this is https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+bug/1511542 | 15:47 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1511542 in unity (Ubuntu) " [2.26 Regression] binutils assertion fail ../../bfd/elfnn-aarch64.c:4631" [High,In progress] | 15:47 |
| seb128 | doko, hey, gdb giving the python errors I just copied, is that known? what component should that be reported against? | 15:48 |
| Laney | doko: :( | 15:50 |
| doko | seb128, do you have a test case, or is this just loading the pretty printer? | 15:53 |
| seb128 | doko, I just do "gdb something" and "run" and ctrl-C and bt | 15:53 |
| seb128 | or attach to an existing process | 15:53 |
| stgraber | cyphermox: hey, who's in charge of network-manager these days? we've got a very serious regression affecting wily and xenial | 15:53 |
| === mitya57_ is now known as mitya57 | ||
| stgraber | slangasek, cyphermox: bug 1512749 | 16:00 |
| ubottu | bug 1512749 in network-manager (Ubuntu Xenial) "lxcbr0 dissappears on Ubuntu 15.10" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1512749 | 16:00 |
| barry | Laney: matplotlib 1.5.0~rc2-1ubuntu3 \o/ | 16:06 |
| barry | Laney: i was just about to start looking at that one :) | 16:06 |
| Laney | barry: hehe | 16:07 |
| Laney | you should make more things depend on glib | 16:07 |
| Laney | then you get people like me to care :P | 16:07 |
| barry | Laney: :) | 16:08 |
| barry | Laney: now i know how to trick you into fixing all the bugs | 16:08 |
| sil2100 | slangasek, doko, cyphermox, any-other-core-dev: could you release https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ledit/+bug/1512776 for me? Thanks! | 16:18 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1512776 in ledit (Ubuntu) "Release no-change rebuild for ocaml transition" [Undecided,In progress] | 16:18 |
| yofel | pitti: fixes for some of the kubuntu autopackagetest failures uploaded, sorry that it took a while (some still need to be uploaded once I fixed our packageset..). Is there some way to list all kubuntu packages with test failures? | 16:19 |
| pitti | yofel: I think the easiest thing to start from is http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/data/status/xenial/amd64/packages.json | 16:20 |
| yofel | ah nice, that works | 16:21 |
| yofel | thanks | 16:21 |
| pitti | yofel: probably easiest with three lines of python -- iterate over status "fail" and "kde" in package, or so? | 16:21 |
| pitti | I'm fairly sure one can do it with json_pp, but I never learned the magic of this; Laney knows this | 16:22 |
| yofel | if the naming would be that easy I wouldn't have trouble :P | 16:23 |
| yofel | but we have lists of all our maintained sources, so filtering that won't be hard | 16:23 |
| Laney | pitti: yofel: The tool that I used was called 'jq' | 16:24 |
| pitti | ah, or that | 16:25 |
| yofel | thanks, I'll look at that | 16:25 |
| pitti | not knowing that i'd just do something like "for p in json.load(f.read()): if p['package'] ... | 16:25 |
| cyphermox | sil2100: looking | 16:32 |
| cyphermox | sil2100: done. | 16:38 |
| bdmurray | tumbleweed: did you say you had updated distro-info-data? | 16:39 |
| sil2100 | cyphermox: thanks! | 16:41 |
| sil2100 | doko: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-api/+bug/1512784 - MIR request pretty please | 16:42 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1512784 in unity-api (Ubuntu) "[MIR] unity-api" [Undecided,New] | 16:42 |
| * ogra_ wonders whats up with the arm builders ... | 16:45 | |
| cjwatson | ogra_: ? | 16:51 |
| ogra_ | cjwatson, well, they seem busy https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/xenial/ubuntu-core-system-image/ (i had them starting immediately all day during test builds) | 16:52 |
| cjwatson | ogra_: they have about a ten-minute queue at the moment due mostly to a batch of KDE uploads, but nothing serious | 16:53 |
| cjwatson | ogra_: see https://launchpad.net/builders/ | 16:53 |
| ogra_ | ah, k | 16:53 |
| ogra_ | well, i'll wait | 16:53 |
| cjwatson | arm64 will take longer, but that's normal | 16:53 |
| cjwatson | I think the 28 minutes on your page is a misestimate | 16:53 |
| ogra_ | yeah, for test builds i dont care for arm64 ... i should have excluded it from ARCHES= | 16:53 |
| === hikiko-lpt is now known as hikiko | ||
| bdmurray | tumbleweed: I ask as I don't seem them in the unapproved SRU queues | 17:05 |
| stgraber | cyphermox: did you see my question above? | 17:08 |
| cyphermox | I had not | 17:08 |
| cyphermox | so, the short answer is "nobody really". | 17:08 |
| cyphermox | NM shouldn't touch the interfaces it doesn't manage, especially not bridges, at all, so something clearly got broken | 17:09 |
| stgraber | I just uploaded a very very ugly workaround to xenial now, if that does the trick, we'll have to SRU this very quickly to wily too until NM gets fixed | 17:09 |
| cyphermox | ok | 17:09 |
| cyphermox | which package? | 17:09 |
| stgraber | lxc | 17:10 |
| stgraber | cyphermox: http://paste.ubuntu.com/13092923/ | 17:10 |
| cyphermox | oh yuck | 17:10 |
| stgraber | yeah | 17:11 |
| stgraber | as I said, very very ugly workaround, does the trick though | 17:11 |
| stgraber | the alternative was a "sleep 5" but well, that'd just be racy :) | 17:11 |
| cyphermox | yeah | 17:11 |
| cyphermox | so, I think we're running into more of the veth vs. straight ethernet device issue | 17:12 |
| stgraber | and nmcli doesn't seem to have a "wait until we reach some kind of final state" | 17:12 |
| stgraber | cyphermox: nah, it's a bridge here and NM does try to do stuff with the bridge backend code | 17:12 |
| stgraber | cyphermox: run: ip link add dev test type bridge && ip link set dev test up && ip addr add 1.2.3.4/24 dev test && sleep 2 && ifconfig test && ip link delete test | 17:13 |
| stgraber | cyphermox: you'll get an interface without an IP | 17:13 |
| stgraber | Nov 3 12:13:17 castiana NetworkManager[21958]: <info> (test): new Bridge device (carrier: OFF, driver: 'bridge', ifindex: 94) | 17:14 |
| stgraber | so NM does detect it as a bridge and then still does stuff to it... | 17:14 |
| stgraber | it doesn't seem to start DHCP on it though, but it still does flush any pre-existing config from it | 17:14 |
| seb128 | cyphermox, you are not maintainin n-m anymore? do you still plan to do the point release updates? | 17:15 |
| cyphermox | I do what I can given available time; but these days there's a lot of things going in front of NM in the todo queue. | 17:16 |
| seb128 | k, just wondering if we should do updates like we handle GNOME ones | 17:18 |
| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
| bdmurray | tumbleweed: Ah, I see its in -proposed for everything except wily. | 17:40 |
| Laney | presumably because we have it in there as Xenial X, so might as well wait for the real release date before SRUing again | 17:41 |
| bdmurray | Laney: got it thanks | 17:42 |
| cyphermox | seb128: by all means, feel free to do the updates for NM, but some may be quite involved :/ | 17:53 |
| seb128 | cyphermox, right... | 17:54 |
| mterry | pitti, hi! I'm looking at the strip-nondeterminism MIR. Looks fine, but I had a question about if enabling this means we'll fail a build if the tool has a problem or if it continues the build in that case (there are several bugs in Debian about strip-nondeterminism having problems on weird files) | 18:07 |
| pitti | mterry: haven't checked for sure, but I'd expect it to FTBFS if dh_strip_nondeterminism fails | 18:09 |
| pitti | mterry: but Debian has run it in production for some time, so I figure the worst bugs have been shaken out already | 18:10 |
| pitti | mterry: and as I said on the bug, if this causes extra FTBFS the foundations team will certainly deal with this | 18:10 |
| pitti | (in the worst case by disabling it for that package or in general) | 18:10 |
| mterry | pitti, OK. Well that's a decision for integration into debhelper anyway. Not a reason to block the MIR. This package itself is maintainable | 18:10 |
| mterry | pitti, cool, thanks! | 18:10 |
| pitti | mterry: right; once approved, I'll revert the delta of dropping the dep from debhelper | 18:11 |
| tumbleweed | bdmurray: oh, yes, I forgot to verify them | 18:16 |
| mterry | bdmurray, the foundations team is looking after strip-nondeterminism in main, FYI | 18:17 |
| bdmurray | tumbleweed: I've verified Trusty and Vivid. | 18:18 |
| tumbleweed | bdmurray: thanks | 18:20 |
| cyphermox | stgraber: what about this? http://cgit.freedesktop.org/NetworkManager/NetworkManager/commit/?id=e29ab54335c6a5ef1ce6bac525f1f18a8e81b96e | 18:32 |
| stgraber | cyphermox: the reproducer in that commit is identical to what we're doing, so that's probably right | 18:37 |
| mterry | bdmurray, and unity-api is being looked after by unity-ui-team in main, FYI! | 19:04 |
| === _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
| decci | I am trying to build .DEB package | 19:35 |
| decci | I ran dh_make -f ../.tar.gz , then debian/rules clean, build and binary. It went good and built .DEB package | 19:36 |
| decci | Now when I again re-run the debian/rules binary it threw error override_dh_auto_install | 19:38 |
| decci | Error code 2 | 19:38 |
| decci | Any idea how to fix this | 19:38 |
| ricotz | decci, you should use "debuild" or "dpkg-buildpackage" to build a source package | 19:38 |
| decci | ricotz: Do you mean use it instead of debian/rules build | 19:39 |
| mterry | jdstrand, and alabaster in main is also looked after by foundations team, fyi! | 19:40 |
| decci | ricotz: So whats the correct way of building .DEB | 19:40 |
| * mterry is clearing out MIRs :) | 19:40 | |
| decci | ricotz: All I follow: 1. dh_make 2. debian/rule clean 3. debian/rules build 4. debian/rules binary | 19:41 |
| decci | ricotz: Where do I need to run debuild? | 19:41 |
| decci | ricotz: I mean after which step | 19:41 |
| ricotz | decci, you downloaded a source package, e.g. having a *.dsc file lying around? | 19:42 |
| ricotz | do "dpkg-source -x *.dsc", go into the src folder and run "dpkg-buildpackage" or "debuild" | 19:42 |
| decci | ricotz: I have source code, when I run dh_make it creates debian folder where rules, preinst and postinst gets created and .dsc gets created at ../ | 19:43 |
| ricotz | so you want to create a debian package from some tarball without any existing packaging information? | 19:44 |
| decci | ricotz: This is a source code internal to company..pre-compiled and linked already | 19:44 |
| decci | ricotz: All I am trying to do is build it to .deb | 19:45 |
| decci | ricotz: yes | 19:45 |
| ricotz | decci, you might want to use "checkinstall" then | 19:45 |
| decci | ricotz: checkinstall doesnt handle rules, preinst and postinst | 19:46 |
| decci | ricotz: I dont see any option for rules specification | 19:46 |
| ricotz | you don't have any packaging information in the first place | 19:46 |
| decci | ricotz: I have rules, postinst and preinst, control files in place | 19:47 |
| ricotz | so simply use the tarball and build it and checkinstall creates a deb | 19:47 |
| ricotz | ok, because you ran dh_make | 19:47 |
| decci | ricotz: All I want to build .DEB package using these rules, preinst and postint | 19:47 |
| ricotz | then debuild from within the root srcdir should work | 19:48 |
| decci | ricotz: dh_make gives me debian folder with rules, post and preinst file created to add the rules | 19:48 |
| ricotz | search for debian packaging details to make further adjustments if needed | 19:48 |
| decci | ricotz: I can try debuild , so do I need to run under my source | 19:49 |
| decci | ricotz: which has Makefile, configure.ac | 19:49 |
| decci | ricotz: CMakeCache.txt | 19:49 |
| decci | ricotz: What could be reason of override_dh_auto_install Error: code 2 | 19:50 |
| ricotz | debuild looks for the debian folder and its content | 19:51 |
| ricotz | sound like an error in your changes to rules | 19:51 |
| ricotz | better paste a more detailed error output (via pastebin), so someone can look at it | 19:52 |
| ricotz | I need to go | 19:53 |
| decci | ricotz: dpkg-source: error: unwanted binary file: debian/CMakeFiles | 19:53 |
| decci | ricotz: dpkg-source: error: detected 4 unwanted binary files (add them in debian/source/include-binaries to allow their inclusion). | 19:54 |
| mterry | bdmurray, and foundations for python-hypothesis too! | 19:54 |
| bdmurray | mterry: got it, thanks | 19:56 |
| decci | dpkg-buildpackage: error: dpkg-source -b dcde_source gave error exit status 29 | 19:56 |
| mterry | bdmurray, (is this the easiest way to update the list? -- I'm fine with it, just curious if these pings get annoying) | 19:57 |
| bdmurray | mterry: the list of teams I'm already aware of can be found here - http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-archive/ubuntu-archive-tools/trunk/view/head:/package-subscribers#L107 | 20:00 |
| bdmurray | mterry: If the team isn't in that list then being notified would be useful | 20:01 |
| mterry | bdmurray, ahh... so if a team subscribes to a bug, you assume they are looking after it as long as they are in this list. It's not a granular team->package thing | 20:01 |
| bdmurray | mterry: right, we look at the packages to which those teams are subscribed | 20:02 |
| mterry | bdmurray, cool OK, then I can drop a lot of pings :) | 20:03 |
| bdmurray | mterry: indeed! | 20:03 |
| cyphermox | stgraber: looks like it's good; I'll upload to xenial now and then we can look at the SRU for this. Can you update the bug to add the template? | 20:35 |
| stgraber | cyphermox: sure, I'll add a testcase once we have it in xenial and working | 20:36 |
| stgraber | cyphermox: I was going to SRU the ugly lxc workaround but if we can get network-manager fixed itself, even better | 20:36 |
| === salem_ is now known as _salem | ||
| chiluk | slangasek: I know you are busy, but can I get an upload for nfs-utils done for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1509120 I have a feeling it will look familiar to you. | 21:02 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1509120 in nfs-utils (Ubuntu) "Process accounting deadlock with idmapd callout when writing to NFSv4 mount" [Medium,In progress] | 21:02 |
| slangasek | chiluk: oh hah, is that really just a keyutils upcall bug? | 21:09 |
| cyphermox | stgraber: yeah, feel free to not SRU your ugly lxc fix now if this NM update works :) | 21:14 |
| stgraber | cyphermox: already reverted it in xenial, it's clearly not something I wanted to have to keep around :) | 21:15 |
| cyphermox | ack. | 21:15 |
| chiluk | slangasek: yes it is. | 21:19 |
| slangasek | chiluk: I notice the rationale for adding the dependency in vivid+ was that this is required for systemd compatibility, because in the systemd case everything assumes we only use /usr/sbin/nfsidmap as an upcall *instead* of running idmapd (/etc/request-key.d/id_resolver.conf). So this certainly seems to be a workaround rather than a proper fix | 21:20 |
| slangasek | do I have that right? | 21:20 |
| chiluk | slangasek: it's not a workaround when communicating with old nfsv4 servers that don't support sec=sys, and thus aren't using idmapd. | 21:23 |
| slangasek | hmm | 21:23 |
| chiluk | afaik.. but I wouldn't consider myself an nfs expert by any stretch of the imagination | 21:24 |
| slangasek | should anyone? ;) | 21:24 |
| chiluk | we were only able to rerpoduce the hang by using an ancient 2.6.32 centos machine | 21:24 |
| chiluk | precisely because sec=sys isn't supported by such an ancient kernel. | 21:24 |
| slangasek | do you know what the RPC is that triggers this path, vs. working via idmapd? | 21:24 |
| chiluk | I don't. | 21:25 |
| slangasek | ok | 21:25 |
| chiluk | I could tcpdump it real quick if you'd like. | 21:25 |
| chiluk | slangasek: ^^ | 21:25 |
| slangasek | chiluk: hit me | 21:25 |
| chiluk | don't tempt me... | 21:26 |
| slangasek | chiluk: has this been reproduced cross-architecture? | 21:26 |
| slangasek | chiluk: because my next question is, is it reproducible with the 14.04.0 kernel or only with hwe-v? | 21:27 |
| chiluk | yeah ppc is hitting it although I don't have a trustable backtrace yet from them, and I'm seeing it on x86_64 | 21:27 |
| chiluk | oh no, I'm using 3.13. | 21:27 |
| slangasek | ok | 21:27 |
| chiluk | do you still want that tcpdump? I just realized that the machine will become unusable once I instantiate the crash.. so we'll see what kind of messages actually can get logged. | 21:28 |
| chiluk | nm I can capture from the server. | 21:29 |
| slangasek | chiluk: I think I'm happy without the tcpdump | 21:30 |
| chiluk | slangasek, yeah .. I was a bit curious myself about the rejected rpc call. | 21:30 |
| Unit193 | FWIW, Debian 786690 still affects wily. | 21:49 |
| ubottu | Debian bug 786690 in pbuilder "pdebuild fails to builds package with dpkg-dev 1.18.0 (dpkg-buildpackage -S failing with missing build-deps)" [Important,Fixed] http://bugs.debian.org/786690 | 21:49 |
| xnox | i'm blinking over "1TB PCIe Solid State Drive" whilst starring at XPS 15 (9550). | 22:59 |
| sarnold | ooo | 23:00 |
| sarnold | chrisccoulson: ^^^ | 23:00 |
| xnox | the new XPS 15, however so far it's with windows only, and i don't see a developer edition with ubuntu yet. | 23:00 |
| xnox | http://www.dell.com/uk/p/xps-15-9550-laptop/pd | 23:00 |
| xnox | superm1: is XPS 15 (9550) pre-orderable as a developer edition? i shall give them a call tomorrow. | 23:01 |
| sil2100 | doko: so, to continue on the ocaml transition I need multiple arm64 binaries built from the dependency level 3 uploads I made, meaning I'm currently stalled on that | 23:05 |
| sil2100 | But tomorrow at least some of them should be available, so I can continue from there then | 23:05 |
| superm1 | xnox: not currently. It's a work in progress still. | 23:07 |
| superm1 | danjared: will know current status better than I | 23:07 |
| cjwatson | sil2100: yeah, for that number it's sensible just to wait - at least the ocaml stack isn't too deep | 23:09 |
| cjwatson | the queue's "only" an hour long at the moment | 23:09 |
| danjared | what'd I do? | 23:41 |
| danjared | xnox: no, no current plans for an Ubuntu version of the XPS 15. there are plans for the Precision Mobile 5510 | 23:42 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!