[08:25] <Saviq> mzanetti-, kgunn, silo 21 ready for QA
[08:25] <kgunn> awesome! enjoy vacation Saviq
[08:26] <Saviq> not just yet! ;)
[08:26] <Saviq> but will, thanks
[08:29] <kgunn> oh...one more day
[08:29] <Saviq> that's assuming that Lufthansa's flight attendants strike that's starting tomorrow won't make it difficult (their association is "UFO" btw)
[08:33] <kgunn> :)
[10:12] <pstolowski> Trevinho, ping
[10:13] <Trevinho> pstolowski: pong
[10:13] <pstolowski> Trevinho, hey Marco!
[10:13] <Trevinho> pstolowski: hey
[10:13] <pstolowski> Trevinho, i've just learned yesterday about the plans of abandoning software center in 16.04
[10:14] <Trevinho> pstolowski: yeah, so it seems the case if we can get gnome sw center in shape for us
[10:14] <pstolowski> Trevinho, do you know what's the plan for the legacy App lens scope with regard to that change? there is a dependency on a software-center bit for previews of apps from the store
[10:14] <pstolowski> Trevinho, and this is a significant bit of code in Apps lens affected by any change like that
[10:15] <Trevinho> pstolowski: mh, not sure... I think you should ask more to robert_ancell
[10:15] <Trevinho> pstolowski: yeah, i was wondering that, but also the idea was to remove some support to install stuff from the dash, if that didn't work with g-s-c
[10:15] <Trevinho> willcooke: do you have further infos about that ^
[10:16] <pstolowski> Trevinho, yeah, i thought that too... changing apps scope would require significant effort.
[10:19] <willcooke> We'd need to speak to Robert
[10:19] <willcooke> it's still early days
[10:19] <willcooke> Does the lens use USC specifically, or does it use the xapian(?) database?
[10:20] <willcooke> seb128 fyi ^
[10:20] <pstolowski> willcooke, it uses xapian AND a helper python service exposed by u-s-c to get some extra data
[10:20]  * tsdgeos wonders if we broke the dash header color setting and noone realized 
[10:20] <seb128> willcooke, I mentioned it during the session yesterday
[10:21] <seb128> willcooke, I think we overlooked the fact that the dash was using s-c bits when we suggested that we could drop s-c now
[10:23] <willcooke> seb128, could you comment on the thread between you, me, laney, robert?
[10:24] <seb128> k
[10:28] <seb128> willcooke, done
[10:32] <willcooke> thx seb128
[10:36] <cimi> ltinkl: ping
[11:47] <kgunn> Saviq: what is the pkg or lp project for the app store login page ?
[11:47] <kgunn> ubuntuone?
[12:07] <davmor2> kgunn: login is https://launchpad.net/ubuntu-sso-client
[12:08] <kgunn> davmor2: ta
[12:33] <dandrader> mzanetti-, if an application is not "touch" it means it's "legacy"?
[12:34] <mzanetti-> yes, as per the prereq branch
[12:35] <dandrader> so how do I make a desktop-only (mouse and keyboard) application that is not "legacy"?
[12:36] <dandrader> greyback, ^
[12:37] <greyback> dandrader: we have no means to specify "desktop-only"
[12:37] <mzanetti-> heh, yeah... there is no such thing as "desktop-only"
[12:38] <greyback> yet
[12:38] <mzanetti-> you might be able to restrict the app to mouse input only, or minimum screen size
[12:39] <mzanetti-> but yes... isTouchApp is probably not the best term
[12:40] <dandrader> reminds me of windows 8 disaster where the desktop was touch-oriented
[12:40] <mzanetti-> otoh... do you think by the time we're ready there will be screens without touch?
[13:12] <mariogrip> what is "Ubuntu Pocket Desktop"? i just saw it on the cdimage server.
[13:34] <dandrader> mterry, is there a simple way to launch an app and have it not be considered a touch app by qtmir?
[13:34] <mterry> dandrader, once silo 21 lands, don' set X-Ubuntu-Touch=true (but only if you're not submitting to store)
[13:35] <mterry> dandrader, (in your desktop file)
[13:35] <dandrader> mterry, ah cool. A just need lp:~mterry/qtmir/no-touch-no-lifecycle and its dependencies, right?
[13:36] <dandrader> s/A/I
[13:36] <mterry> dandrader, yup
[13:36] <mterry> dandrader, those branches will turn off lifecycle management.  Other branches we have lying around may do other things based on that info
[13:36] <Saviq> dandrader, best use silo 21 as-is, and https://code.launchpad.net/~ci-train-bot/unity8/ as base
[13:37] <mterry> Saviq, we still trying to land silo 21 for OTA8?
[13:37] <Saviq> mterry, made it QA ready this morning, hope so
[13:37] <mterry> (or was that never the plan?)
[13:37] <mterry> Saviq, oh awesome
[13:37] <mterry> Saviq, I want some of those fixes for my daily device  :)
[13:37] <Saviq> mterry, I know ;)
[13:38] <Saviq> should be good, finally
[18:02] <mzanetti-> dandrader|afk, https://code.launchpad.net/~mzanetti/unity8/move-screenshots-to-tests/+merge/276798
[18:20] <dandrader> mzanetti-, where's my mouseEdgePush review?