=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-uos-cloud to: Currently no events are active in this room - http://summit.ubuntu.com/uos-1511/cloud/ - http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2015/11/05/%23ubuntu-uos-cloud.html === yolo is now known as Guest93182 === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-uos-cloud to: Track: Cloud | An Introduction to LXD: The Container Hypervisor | Url: http://summit.ubuntu.com/uos-1511/meeting/22625/an-introduction-to-lxd-the-container-hypervisor/ [16:19] QUESTION: do you think "lxc" as the name for the CLI tool is a bit confusing? What is the rational of that? (as it can be confused with LXC) [16:20] ara, ACK. I have your question tee'd up. [16:30] can you set resource limits such as CPU,RAM,DIsk,Bandwidth on a per container basis from the API and from the lxc CLI? [16:32] QUESTION: will it be possible to "push" from local without having lxd exposed. As i understand pushin to a remote basically pull from the local lxd [16:32] dweaver, derEmerit: ACK. I've captured your questions for Stephane. [16:34] brb === ara is now known as ara_afk [16:36] QUESTION: How does lxd order networks when containers have multiple physical networks? [16:37] dweaver, ACK. Captured. [16:37] QUESTION: Can we study/reproduce the Ubuntu images published on images.linuxcontainers.org? Is there a public method to build them from stock Ubuntu releases? [16:38] frantou, ACK. === ara_afk is now known as ara [16:39] re [16:50] QUESTION: is there an idea to work on a connection to the libvirt ecosystem, or will lxd exist pure in parallel and more tight to openstack? libvirt can some things lxd does i think [16:51] bt909, ack [16:52] QUESTION: Followup! how would I currently push a locally developed image when I'm behind a firewall [16:55] stgraber, jgrimm: thanks a lot to both, great session [16:55] great session, great work at all [16:56] thanks! === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-uos-cloud to: Currently no events are active in this room - http://summit.ubuntu.com/uos-1511/cloud/ - http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2015/11/05/%23ubuntu-uos-cloud.html [16:56] Thank you! Has this session been recorded? [16:56] Thanks you everyone. [16:57] frantou, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B_vRmItDOR [16:58] going to take a bit for youtube to publish it though [16:58] jgrimm: Great, thanks! [16:58] stgraber, i'm watching it now [16:58] your link is missing a character I think :) [16:58] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B_vRmItDORo [16:58] stgraber, oops. thanks! [16:59] oops, just noticed I forgot to unfocus my laptop towards the end, so people can hear us but not see us :) [16:59] oh well, they get to look at my last slide a lot more then :) [17:00] That's OK, we focused on what you said. === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-uos-cloud to: Track: Cloud | Juju Office Hours | Url: http://summit.ubuntu.com/uos-1511/meeting/22578/juju-office-hours/ [17:56] o/ [18:02] http://interfaces.juju.solutions/ [18:04] https://insights.ubuntu.com/2015/10/29/now-youre-charming-with-layers/ - if you missed the talks earlier this week covering layers. here's an excellent blog from cory_fu over the topic [18:05] Walkthrough: https://jujucharms.com/docs/devel/authors-charm-building [18:05] marcoceppi_: can you cover 1.25? [18:05] jcastro: yes [18:09] https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0ByzcfkBiyc7aZmNkX0kxRG5rX1k&usp=drive_web [18:09] design for java ^^ [18:17] http://bigdata.juju.solutions/2015-10-29-now-youre-charming-with-layers/ [18:21] One thing I'd like to clarify about interface layers is they should *only* cover the communication protocol that happens over the relation. They shouldn't contain any "behavior" implementation, as that should be handled by the charms on either side of the relation [18:33] marcoceppi_, where were all the benchmarking charms you used in the demo, e.g. siege, collector? === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-uos-cloud to: Currently no events are active in this room - http://summit.ubuntu.com/uos-1511/cloud/ - http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2015/11/05/%23ubuntu-uos-cloud.html [20:45] Just watched the video of the LXD UOS talk. For a desktop user, like me, is this technology capable of replacing a VM (i.e. can I run X11 desktop apps with hardware acceleration)? [20:50] (I'm waiting for a solution to containerise my development setup, my games setup, my alternative distros, etc...)