[16:19] <ara> QUESTION: do you think "lxc" as the name for the CLI tool is a bit confusing? What is the rational of that? (as it can be confused with LXC)
[16:20] <jgrimm> ara, ACK. I have your question tee'd up.
[16:30] <dweaver> can you set resource limits such as CPU,RAM,DIsk,Bandwidth on a per container basis from the API and from the lxc CLI?
[16:32] <derEremit> QUESTION: will it be possible to "push" from local without having lxd exposed. As i understand pushin to a remote basically pull from the local lxd
[16:32] <jgrimm> dweaver, derEmerit: ACK. I've captured your questions for Stephane.
[16:34] <ara> brb
[16:36] <dweaver> QUESTION: How does lxd order networks when containers have multiple physical networks?
[16:37] <jgrimm> dweaver, ACK. Captured.
[16:37] <frantou> QUESTION: Can we study/reproduce the Ubuntu images published on images.linuxcontainers.org?  Is there a public method to build them from stock Ubuntu releases?
[16:38] <jgrimm> frantou, ACK.
[16:39] <ara> re
[16:50] <bt909> QUESTION: is there an idea to work on a connection to the libvirt ecosystem, or  will lxd exist pure in parallel and more tight to openstack? libvirt can some things lxd does i think
[16:51] <jgrimm> bt909, ack
[16:52] <derEremit> QUESTION: Followup! how would I currently push a locally developed image when I'm behind a firewall
[16:55] <ara> stgraber, jgrimm: thanks a lot to both, great session
[16:55] <bt909> great session, great work at all
[16:56] <stgraber> thanks!
[16:56] <frantou> Thank you!  Has this session been recorded?
[16:56] <jgrimm> Thanks you everyone.
[16:57] <jgrimm> frantou, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B_vRmItDOR
[16:58] <stgraber> going to take a bit for youtube to publish it though
[16:58] <frantou> jgrimm: Great, thanks!
[16:58] <jgrimm> stgraber, i'm watching it now
[16:58] <stgraber> your link is missing a character I think :)
[16:58] <stgraber> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B_vRmItDORo
[16:58] <jgrimm> stgraber, oops. thanks!
[16:59] <stgraber> oops, just noticed I forgot to unfocus my laptop towards the end, so people can hear us but not see us :)
[16:59] <stgraber> oh well, they get to look at my last slide a lot more then :)
[17:00] <frantou> That's OK, we focused on what you said.
[17:56] <marcoceppi_> o/
[18:02] <cory_fu> http://interfaces.juju.solutions/
[18:04] <lazypower> https://insights.ubuntu.com/2015/10/29/now-youre-charming-with-layers/ - if you missed the talks earlier this week covering layers. here's an excellent blog from cory_fu over the topic
[18:05] <cory_fu> Walkthrough: https://jujucharms.com/docs/devel/authors-charm-building
[18:05] <jcastro> marcoceppi_: can you cover 1.25?
[18:05] <marcoceppi_> jcastro: yes
[18:09] <kwmonroe> https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0ByzcfkBiyc7aZmNkX0kxRG5rX1k&usp=drive_web
[18:09] <kwmonroe> design for java ^^
[18:17] <cory_fu> http://bigdata.juju.solutions/2015-10-29-now-youre-charming-with-layers/
[18:21] <cory_fu> One thing I'd like to clarify about interface layers is they should *only* cover the communication protocol that happens over the relation.  They shouldn't contain any "behavior" implementation, as that should be handled by the charms on either side of the relation
[18:33] <dweaver> marcoceppi_, where were all the benchmarking charms you used in the demo, e.g. siege, collector?
[20:45] <mcphail> Just watched the video of the LXD UOS talk. For a desktop user, like me, is this technology capable of replacing a VM (i.e. can I run X11 desktop apps with hardware acceleration)?
[20:50] <mcphail> (I'm waiting for a solution to containerise my development setup, my games setup, my alternative distros, etc...)