| === salem_ is now known as _salem | ||
| Mirv | jamesh: publishing mediascanner2 | 06:02 |
|---|---|---|
| jamesh | Mirv: thanks. | 06:02 |
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| jgdx | Mirv, any idea why [1] wasn't merged/published? I usually don't do that, but should I? [1] https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/611 | 07:34 |
| Mirv | jgdx: you could, but I would have published it if it would have showed at https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/publishable | 07:38 |
| Mirv | I'm not sure right away why it's not shown like that, there's no error state either (or dirty flag) | 07:38 |
| Mirv | jgdx: ok, it's published! merging after xenial migrates from proposed to release pocket. | 07:39 |
| jgdx | Mirv, thanks :) | 07:45 |
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| oSoMoN | trainguards: good morning! can the xenial armhf build of webbrowser-app be retried in silo 39 please? | 07:57 |
| oSoMoN | trainguards: nevermind my previous request, I’ve added a branch to the silo and am rebuilding it | 08:29 |
| Mirv | oSoMoN: ok :) | 08:57 |
| Davmor2 | jibel our isp is completely down, no TV internet or phone line 😞 | 09:07 |
| Davmor2 | jibel could you let Tao know please | 09:08 |
| Davmor2 | trying to rig something up | 09:08 |
| jibel | Davmor2, okay, good luck with that | 09:15 |
| === joc|away is now known as joc_ | ||
| oSoMoN | trainguards: can the xenial armhf build of webbrowser-app be retried in silo 39 please? | 09:50 |
| sil2100 | oSoMoN: done | 10:14 |
| oSoMoN | sil2100, thanks | 10:15 |
| rvr | popey: ping | 10:22 |
| popey | rvr, pong! | 10:22 |
| rvr | popey: I found some issues while testing reminders https://trello.com/c/NljolsaY/2457-342-reminders-popey | 10:22 |
| popey | oh, thanks rvr, I'll take a look | 10:23 |
| === _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
| Mirv | oSoMoN: seems the currently running armhf builds are again both successful (both past the failure points)? | 11:48 |
| Mirv | oSoMoN: happened to notice you kicked yet another build | 11:48 |
| oSoMoN | Mirv, yes, I removed a branch from the silo which I suspected triggered the failure, and indeed the builds are successful now, so now I know which branch to blame | 11:49 |
| Mirv | oSoMoN: ok | 11:49 |
| jibel | rvr, I don't see any update on silo 1, didyou get any feedback? | 11:51 |
| rvr | jibel: Nope | 11:51 |
| rvr | mardy: Did you see this? https://trello.com/c/vijFD6JO/2439-591-ubuntu-landing-001-online-accounts-api-dbarth | 11:52 |
| mardy | rvr: yes, it's because I actually added a workaround to the click package not to crash, let me reupload a non-patched click | 12:23 |
| rvr | mardy: Ah | 12:23 |
| mardy | rvr: ok, can you try redownloading the click now? | 12:27 |
| rvr | mardy: Same URL? http://mardy.it/archivos/it.mardy.uploader_0.3_armhf.click | 12:28 |
| mardy | rvr: yes | 12:29 |
| rvr | Downloaded | 12:30 |
| kgunn | sil2100: hey, so who on the team would you talk to if you needed to make sure you had the right kernel for a device (flo/n7 in this case) in order to rebuild for debug ? | 13:54 |
| kgunn | sil2100: is it just the aosp kernel? or do we have patches somewhere (i suspect) | 13:54 |
| sil2100 | kgunn: hmmm, flo you say... | 13:55 |
| kgunn | sil2100: yep | 13:55 |
| sil2100 | kgunn: I think the best and quickest bet is john-mcaleely, as he would at least know who to poke further - I think he also did the flo/mako device tarballs | 13:56 |
| john-mcaleely | flo/mako? morphis :-) | 13:56 |
| kgunn | ah... | 13:58 |
| sil2100 | Ah, right, morphis is working on that now :) | 14:00 |
| morphis | kgunn: the source is on http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git/ubuntu/ubuntu-vivid.git/log/?h=flo | 14:23 |
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| rvr | dbarth: mardy: Approving silo 2 (location service) | 16:12 |
| mardy | rvr: \o/ | 16:13 |
| jibel | AlbertA, kgunn silo 18 approved | 16:16 |
| AlbertA | jibel: thanks! | 16:16 |
| kgunn | cool | 16:17 |
| kgunn | trainguards is there going to be any issue with silo 18 migrating ? has arm64/ppcel fails for Xenial only | 16:17 |
| dbarth | rvr: \o/ | 16:21 |
| jibel | dbarth, are you publishing silo 2? | 16:42 |
| dbarth | jibel: just finishing my call, and yes, publishing now | 17:00 |
| === dpm_ is now known as dpm | ||
| === alan_g is now known as alan_g|EOD | ||
| robru | slangasek: would you consider bumping the priority of this rt? https://rt.admin.canonical.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=86240 staging deployment is horribly broken and this time not blocked by something I can back out. | 18:23 |
| slangasek | robru: done | 18:26 |
| robru | slangasek: thanks | 18:26 |
| rvr | kgunn: Silo 44 is approved, needs someone to publish it | 18:44 |
| kgunn | rvr: ta | 18:50 |
| kgunn | trainguards we have silo 18 approved...but it had Xenial ppc/arm64 failures (see the comments) | 18:52 |
| kgunn | i noticed it doens't appear as publishable | 18:52 |
| kgunn | but can i ask that still be published ? | 18:52 |
| robru | kgunn: well if those failures are regressions on those arches then it won't make it through proposed, no | 19:20 |
| robru | kgunn: I don't understand why qa would even look at a silo that's in a failed state. | 19:21 |
| robru | kgunn: I'm afraid you're going to either have to fix those failures & rebuild & re-qa, or ask #ubuntu-release really, really nicely if they'll let you regress on those arches. | 19:27 |
| AlbertA | robru: arm64 has a linker bug we can't do anything about at the moment: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+bug/1511542 | 19:27 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1511542 in Unity " [2.26 Regression] binutils assertion fail ../../bfd/elfnn-aarch64.c:4631" [High,Fix committed] | 19:27 |
| robru | AlbertA: ok. so I'm saying if this gets published as-is it'll just sit in -proposed until that gets fixed. | 19:28 |
| AlbertA | robru: could we publish the vivid+overlay part? I guess that's more pressing than xenial | 19:28 |
| robru | AlbertA: I'm finding this "let's break xenial because we only care about vivid" attitude really troubling. | 19:29 |
| AlbertA | robru: newsflash xenial is broken | 19:30 |
| AlbertA | robru: in arm64 | 19:30 |
| robru | AlbertA: ok well if you can get a core dev to publish the silo, I can force merge it and we can just let the xenial packages sit in proposed then. | 19:30 |
| robru | AlbertA: remember trainguards don't publish anymore, so just try publishing it yourself and then if you're not allowed (because there's a packaging diff), then find a core dev. | 19:32 |
| AlbertA | robru: ok sounds good | 19:32 |
| robru | slangasek: want to skip 1:1 because we just had the sprint? | 19:53 |
| slangasek | robru: if you don't have anything for today, we can skip | 19:57 |
| robru | slangasek: yep, let's skip | 19:58 |
| kgunn | network fun | 20:01 |
| kgunn | robru: it's my understanding from AlbertA we were victims on those, arm64 | 20:01 |
| slangasek | I see "xenial is broken on arm64" in scrollback; what does this refer to? | 20:02 |
| robru | kgunn: right, while you were off I said you could publish & then I'd force-merge to ignore the packages getting stuck in proposed | 20:02 |
| AlbertA | slangasek: https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/634 | 20:02 |
| robru | slangasek: mir fails to build in xenial on arm64 | 20:02 |
| AlbertA | slangasek: sorry, this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+bug/1511542 | 20:02 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1511542 in Unity " [2.26 Regression] binutils assertion fail ../../bfd/elfnn-aarch64.c:4631" [High,Fix committed] | 20:02 |
| robru | slangasek: and they want to publish this anyway because they claim it's not their fault | 20:02 |
| slangasek | if it's a binutils bug, it's indeed not their fault | 20:03 |
| slangasek | however, that bug is fixed in xenial | 20:03 |
| kgunn | ...."allegedly" :) | 20:03 |
| kgunn | slangasek: probably just lag in the landing pipe | 20:03 |
| AlbertA | slangasek: recently? so just rebuild again? | 20:03 |
| slangasek | AlbertA: it was fixed on Friday IIRC | 20:03 |
| kgunn | yep | 20:03 |
| kgunn | makes sense | 20:03 |
| robru | AlbertA: ok but don't do a build in the train, I'll retry the arch | 20:03 |
| slangasek | and the bug state in LP shows all of this | 20:03 |
| AlbertA | robru: thanks! | 20:06 |
| robru | AlbertA: you're welcome | 20:06 |
| robru | AlbertA: kgunn: I noticed there was also a failure on ppc64el, is that the same issue? | 20:07 |
| kgunn | that was a timeout afiak | 20:07 |
| kgunn | afaik even | 20:07 |
| robru | kgunn: so should work on a rebuild? I tried it, we'll se | 20:08 |
| slangasek | +1 :) | 20:08 |
| AlbertA | robru: kgunn: right | 20:08 |
| * robru --> lunch | 20:11 | |
| === salem_ is now known as _salem | ||
| sil2100 | ogra_: hey! Could you review and approve/merge https://code.launchpad.net/~sil2100/livecd-rootfs/fix-apt-lists-rm-hook/+merge/273117 ? | 22:49 |
| sil2100 | ogra_: it's already present and working on our vivid images | 22:49 |
| robru | sil2100: good got how are you awake? | 22:49 |
| sil2100 | robru: still doing some clean up ;) It's not so late here, wanted to finish up some things as we have a holiday tomorrow | 22:50 |
| robru | kenvandine: are content-hub's autopkgtests new in xenial? | 22:52 |
| robru | kenvandine: or atleast new since vivid | 22:53 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!