[16:57] <kees> o/
[16:58] <mdeslaur> hi kees
[16:58] <kees> this looks like a short meeting :)
[17:00] <mdeslaur> ah, more people
[17:00]  * infinity hands kees a chair.
[17:00] <pitti> o/
[17:00] <kees> #startmeeting
[17:00] <meetingology> Meeting started Tue Nov 10 17:00:12 2015 UTC.  The chair is kees. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology.
[17:00] <meetingology> Available commands: action commands idea info link nick
[17:00]  * slangasek waves
[17:01] <kees> ok. actions review!
[17:01] <kees> slangasek: juju and maas docs?
[17:01] <slangasek> right
[17:01] <slangasek> so we had some relevant discussions about this on IRC the last couple of weeks
[17:02] <slangasek> turns out we don't actually have a TB-approved SRE for maas yet
[17:02] <slangasek> we have a provisional SRE from infinity
[17:02] <slangasek> and the maas team has not followed up with the documentation
[17:02] <kees> ah ha
[17:02] <slangasek> so the juju one is still on my plate, but I'm punting the maas over to infinity
[17:02]  * infinity considers himself punted.
[17:03] <infinity> kees: Record an action for me to review the provisional exception and chase up the rowing of their ducks.
[17:03] <slangasek> infinity: the trigger for all of this is that roaksoax has requested SRU for the next upstream version
[17:04] <slangasek> so it would be great to get that all sorted out
[17:04] <slangasek> and if them providing documentation of their QA plan is still a prereq for a permanent SRE, we should let them know
[17:04] <infinity> slangasek: Indeed, he's been bugging me about that.  So this one will be another manual review, I think (so, still provisional), with more making sure their test processes and bug responses are all in order.
[17:04] <kees> #action infinity to review pSRE for maas
[17:04] <meetingology> ACTION: infinity to review pSRE for maas
[17:04] <slangasek> lamont is taking point on this from the maas team's side now
[17:06] <infinity> slangasek: I'm mostly concerned about their post-release process, to be fair.  Their testing seems to have decent coverage (though could be better documented), but the notion that one can test for every scenario is daft, so I need to make sure they're responding to regressions in a very timely fashion before we let them loose.
[17:06] <slangasek> ok
[17:06] <kees> #topic mailing list
[17:07] <kees> empty it is.
[17:07] <kees> anyone see any hanging threads?
[17:07] <pitti> not me, it's been quiet for the past few weeks
[17:08] <kees> #topic bugs
[17:08] <kees> also empty
[17:08] <kees> #topic other business
[17:09] <kees> anything we need to cover?
[17:09] <pitti> nothing from me
[17:09] <mdeslaur> nothing from me
[17:09] <slangasek> nothingh ere
[17:09] <infinity> I'm good.
[17:10] <slangasek> next meeting / next chair?
[17:10] <mdeslaur> that would be me I believe
[17:10] <kees> #next chair
[17:10] <infinity> mdeslaur, pitti as fallback.
[17:10] <kees> #topic next chair
[17:10] <infinity> On the 24th.
[17:10] <kees> yawp
[17:11] <kees> easy meeting! :)
[17:11] <infinity> Almost... Too easy.
[17:11] <infinity> *suspicious look*
[17:11] <kees> thanks everyone!
[17:11] <mdeslaur> hehe
[17:11] <kees> heheh
[17:11] <mdeslaur> thanks!
[17:11] <kees> #endmeeting
[17:11] <meetingology> Meeting ended Tue Nov 10 17:11:36 2015 UTC.
[17:11] <meetingology> Minutes:        http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting-2/2015/ubuntu-meeting-2.2015-11-10-17.00.moin.txt
[17:12] <pitti> thanks everyone! that was easy again