[09:13] <morphis> currently trying to propose a merge for a git repo in launchpad but getting an error "lp:~morphis/libhybris/+git/libhybris-ubuntu is not mergeable into this repository", can someone help to figure out what the actual problem is?
[09:17] <morphis> cjwatson: can you help me?
[09:28] <wgrant> morphis: Which repository are you trying to merge into?
[09:28] <morphis> wgrant: https://code.launchpad.net/~libhybris-maintainers/+git/libhybris
[09:28] <morphis> https://code.launchpad.net/~morphis/libhybris/+git/libhybris-ubuntu/+ref/wip is the branch I want to merge
[09:28] <morphis> basically just trying it for now ..
[09:29] <wgrant> morphis: https://code.launchpad.net/~libhybris-maintainers/+git/libhybris isn't in any project.
[09:29] <wgrant> It's a personal branch unrelated to a project.
[09:29] <wgrant> The owner should visit https://code.launchpad.net/~libhybris-maintainers/+git/libhybris/+edit and switch it from "Personal" into the libhybris project, which will change the URL and allow merge proposals.
[09:30] <morphis> so you can only merge into projects?
[09:30] <morphis> wgrant: thanks, that worked: https://code.launchpad.net/~morphis/libhybris/+git/libhybris-ubuntu/+merge/277220
[09:31] <wgrant> You can only merge between repositories in the same context.
[09:31] <wgrant> Context being project or package.
[09:31] <morphis> I see, that wasn't clear for me before
[09:31] <wgrant> +git is the Git equivalent of Bazaar's +junk.
[09:32] <morphis> wgrant: there is a lp:libhybris for bzr
[09:32] <morphis> what is the equivalent for git?
[09:32] <morphis> as right now it looks like this: https://code.launchpad.net/libhybris/+git
[09:33] <wgrant> morphis: https://code.launchpad.net/libhybris/+configure-code is the relevant page.
[09:33] <wgrant> There you can choose the default VCS, and the Bazaar branch and Git repository that get the short name.
[09:33] <wgrant> The default VCS chooses which list is displayed by default.
[09:33] <morphis> ok
[09:34] <wgrant> Git doesn't natively support lp: like Bazaar does, but you can configure it to know about it.
[09:34] <morphis> wgrant: yeah, that is what I did
[09:34] <wgrant> Setting the default repository makes "git clone https://git.launchpad.net/libhybris" etc. work.
[09:35] <morphis> wgrant: lp:libhybris currently is a auto-import branch, what is the way to deal with them when you decide to switch a project over completely to git? they just go away and would probably stay as an upstream branch?
[09:35] <wgrant> morphis: Well, it sort of fades into obscurity once you change the default, unless someone hits the "View Bazaar branches" link.
[09:38] <morphis> ok
[11:27] <sidi> A quick question about copying packages in a PPA and having Launchpad rebuild them from source.. I get the following error message: same version already has published binaries in the destination archive
[11:27] <sidi> Does that mean that when rebuilding, I *must* select another PPA since identical versions are not allowed?
[11:28] <sidi> I don't want to just copy the binary packages because I want to make sure they build properly (i.e. no deps changed)
[11:32] <cjwatson> sidi: right, in any given archive, files of the same name may only exist once
[11:33] <cjwatson> sidi: if you copied within the same archive and asked to rebuild, you'd end up with pool/main/f/foo/foo_1.0-1_amd64.deb needing to exist twice with different contents
[11:33] <cjwatson> sidi: so your choices are (a) don't rebuild (b) use a different PPA (c) upload with a different version rather than copying
[11:34] <sidi> cjwatson, thanks, will go with (c). It'd be awesome to have an option to rebuild and just bump the version number (ppax -> ppax+1) though, would have saved me 30-60 minutes :-)
[15:22] <Laney> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/225818700/buildlog_ubuntu-xenial-ppc64el.amide_1.0.5-4ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz <- this looks weird
[15:27] <cjwatson> there are a few known memory corruption issues with the power builders - the incidence is rare but sadly non-zero
[15:29] <cjwatson> Laney: I've asked IS to investigate in case of obvious dmesg spam, but in the meantime I suggest just retrying
[15:29] <Laney> cjwatson: Will do - you don't need to keep any state?
[15:30] <cjwatson> Laney: I've extracted the relevant state, i.e. builder and build start time
[15:30] <cjwatson> but thanks for checking
[15:30] <Laney> Nod, okay
[15:30] <cjwatson> doubt anything else is relevant, I mean it go bang
[15:31] <Laney> I saw a similar one earlier but I retried that without checking
[15:31] <Laney> my bad