=== salem_ is now known as _salem [03:46] michi, can you provide the branch or job that was giving you problems? I want to make sure I get the right branch updated. [03:46] fginther: Sorry, no. [03:47] Basically, I found a bug in abi-compliance-checker yesterday. [03:47] We need to change the way we dump ABI [03:47] using abi-dumper [03:47] But Wily has a version of that that is too old. [03:47] I could have a branch by tomorrow, I think. [03:48] But, basically, all we need is for unity-scopes-api to build for vivid+overlay and xenial, instead of vivid+overlay and wily [03:56] michi, I'm getting lp:unity-scopes-api/devel updated now, all the others should already be good to go for you [03:56] Awesome, thank you very much! [04:01] fginther: there is a very half-baked branch in silo 48 at the moment, for what it’s worth. [05:41] renatu: sure === marcusto_ is now known as marcustomlinson [08:14] hey trainguards, looks like i hit gcc5 bug on ppc64el in the silo https://launchpadlibrarian.net/225718029/buildlog_ubuntu-xenial-ppc64el.unity-scopes-shell_0.5.6%2B16.04.20151110.1-0ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz , only on xenial [08:14] was there any gcc5 update recently in X? [08:21] anyway, opened https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-5/+bug/1515514 [08:21] Ubuntu bug 1515514 in gcc-5 (Ubuntu) "gcc5 ICE on unity-scopes-shell in xenial ppc64el" [Undecided,New] [08:33] pstolowski: thanks for opening the bug! doko will look at it probably soon. [08:40] Mirv, yw. i hope we can just revert to a previous gcc5 version for now if this is a problem with a minor update [08:41] pstolowski: that said, I don't see a new gcc5 version in November [08:42] last one was 2015-10-29 [08:42] interesting [08:48] Mirv, could very well be some other updated of a dependency that triggered it [08:48] Mirv, e.g. /usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/qt5/QtTest/qtesteventloop.h:48:24: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault [08:49] pstolowski: seems random, my ppc64el rebuild in your PPA worked. let the bug be there but it seems it's not constant. so just run watch_only build now. [08:51] Mirv, okay. it's a bit concerning though.. === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun [10:48] jibel: so, seeing the e-mails... do we have everything we need in the overlay now? [11:10] sil2100, we still need a fix for bug 1515356 [11:10] bug 1515356 in Canonical System Image "After a boot the dash doesn't display until touched" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1515356 [11:11] jibel: you prefer to wait for it with gates closed, or should I snapshot now and we cherry pick once there's something releasable? [11:11] sil2100, as you prefer, you do the copies [11:12] I'll maybe do the snapshot in a moment then [11:12] sil2100, we won't resume silo landing now anyway [11:12] sil2100, we are a bit late on regression [11:12] regression testing I mean === _salem is now known as salem_ [12:44] rvr, pong [12:44] jgdx: I don't remember now :) [12:45] rvr, any time [12:50] sil2100, hi [12:53] victorp: hey [12:53] sil2100, quick q [12:53] ota8 is going according to plan re: schedule? [12:53] victorp: well... not entirely [12:54] victorp: we're a bit late on the regression testing right now as there were regressions spotted, so testing might be delayed slightly [12:54] Yesterday's holiday for many people also didn't help here [12:55] sil2100, ok, but are talking a day or so? [12:55] Won't be a huge delay though, but I think we should prepare ourselves for a day/two of a delay === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk === alan_g is now known as alan_g|lunch === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun [13:22] bzoltan_, the crash is a known issue in testtools it seems, although hard to track down as it only happens occasionally to people [13:23] bzoltan_, we are going to make a version of autopilot which will gather some extra info to pinpoint the problem [13:23] trainguards: hi, qtmir is stuck in proposed due to an armhf compile fail against the rest of xenial -proposed. I've a fix for the compile fail ready. How can I proceed? Kick package out of -proposed and re-do the landing just for xenial? === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk [14:08] greyback: right, if you don't want to land anything now to vivid (understandable because of the freeze), I'd merge&clean the current landing and do a xenial only one time landing to fix the armhf issue. and thanks, I thought the qtmir bug was Qt 5.5 related but it seems it was generic xenial! [14:31] Mirv: train doesn't allow me to force a Merge & clean. Can you do that, and I'll set up the xenial-only silo? [14:42] hello trainguards, may i ask for removing any remains of unity-scope-click from silo 8 & its ppa? i once added u-s-click MP to it but then removed it [14:44] AlbertA: are we stuck on xenial ppc ? [14:52] robru: hey, what are our options to get silo 18 published ? [14:53] i'm bumping up against that silo being needed for biz/prodmgmt folks [14:53] robru: can we publish with followup on disabling that one test for ppc on xenial? or are we going to have to disable and rebuild first ? [14:59] brendand: Good news... in the meantime I have started to reduce the failures in the UITK to ease the pressure on the testtols === alan_g|lunch is now known as alan_g [15:09] trainguards could we get a xenial ppc64el only rebuild attempt on silo18 ? [15:17] o/ [15:17] pstolowski, kgunn: on both of your requests in a minute [15:18] sil2100, k, thanks [15:22] np [15:23] greyback: done, go ahead with xenial [15:23] Mirv: thanks [15:28] kgunn: I've retried that for you [15:29] bzoltan_, always a good idea :) [15:43] pstolowski: packages removed [15:44] sil2100, thanks. but https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/506 still says unity-scope-click in source package names, is it ok? [15:44] sil2100, i tried to edit it before, but it was coming back [15:45] pstolowski: try doing a watch_only build later, it shouldn't appear anymore as it's not in the PPA [15:45] sil2100, ah, ok. thanks! [16:12] trainguards hooray, can someone now publish ? ^ [16:12] kgunn: 18? :) [16:13] sil2100: yeah just did a watch on it so it would take the silo out of build failure status [16:18] kgunn, AlbertA, jibel: is silo 18 for OTA-8 still? [16:26] sil2100: I don't know actually, kgunn? [16:27] I'm snapshotting the PPA and would like to know if I supposed to copy it over as well [16:27] I expect no landings other than regression fixes [16:28] Ok then [17:23] brendand: is there a silo or ppa I could test the new AP package? [17:24] bzoltan_, no there isn't anything yet - unfortunately it needs a new version of testtools that isn't in the archive [17:25] bzoltan_, veebers was looking at that, i'll check back with him later [17:25] brendand: is there a way to work around or hack the testtools? [17:26] brendand: you mentioned that the problem could be when testtols try to log something after a failed test. is there a way to disable it? [17:28] bzoltan_, if you have a log with the crash in it i can tell you, but i lost my traceback so i can't remember what the function was [17:29] brendand: just tell me the filenames you need from me... I have a fresh crashed device [17:29] bzoltan_, the crash would be on the terminal where you ran autopilot or phablet-test-run [17:31] brendand: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/13240221/ [17:32] bzoltan_, that's not what i was expecting [17:32] brendand: I was expecting a nicely working AP test too :) [17:33] bzoltan_, that's completely different from the traceback i have [17:33] bzoltan_, i need more context [17:33] brendand: do you want the individual test what messes up the system? [17:33] brendand: let me do it [17:33] bzoltan_, ideally i would need to see the whole terminal output including the command run [17:34] brendand: the command was autopilot3 run ubuntuuitoolkit [17:34] bzoltan_, on the device? [17:34] brendand: yes [17:35] brendand: phablet-test-run ubuntuuitoolkit [18:20] kgunn: so you need a core dev to publish 18 due to the packaging changes. [18:20] kgunn: but it sounds like you missed the cutoff for ota8 if I read correctly === alan_g is now known as alan_g|EOD [18:51] robru, mind doing a dput for qtmultimedia from ppa:jhodapp/ubuntu/ppa to silo 9 [18:52] jhodapp: sure one sec [18:52] thanks [18:52] jhodapp: done. you're welcome! [18:53] excellent thanks [19:09] jibel: if you see somebody from mir folks.. they might be interested about this - http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/13241002/ [19:13] robru: yeah, no biggie missing ota8, more about enabling some biz guys [19:15] robru, kgunn: yeah, a core-dev is needed here, it's fine to land to the overlay as we're unfreezing now === sil2100 changed the topic of #ubuntu-ci-eng to: Train trouble? ping trainguards | CI problems? ping cihelp | Train: http://bit.ly/1hGZsfS | QA Signoffs: http://bit.ly/1qMAKYd | Known Issues: OTA-8 preparation in progress [20:17] trainguards: can someone please trigger a rebuild of dialer-app for xenial armhf on silo 0? [20:17] boiko: on it [20:19] robru: thanks [20:36] boiko: you're welcome === salem_ is now known as _salem [20:58] much qa [20:58] wow === fginther changed the topic of #ubuntu-ci-eng to: Train trouble? ping trainguards | CI problems? ping cihelp | Train: http://bit.ly/1hGZsfS | QA Signoffs: http://bit.ly/1qMAKYd | Known Issues: OTA-8 preparation in progress, ubuntu-ci jenkins are temporarily shutdown