[00:54] <gshmu> ubuntu-device-flash can't flash recovery image
[00:54] <gshmu> how to fix this?
[07:27] <mardy> Mirv: hi! About bug 1508260, the upstream change has been approved, so I think we can backport it to Qt 5.5; should I assign the bug to you?
[07:42] <Mirv> mardy: yes. feel free. 5.5 only?
[07:42] <Mirv> mardy: we've 5.4.1 (vivid overlay), 5.4.2 (xenial), 5.5.1 (PPA)
[07:46] <Mirv>  I'm assuming we want it for vivid overlay too so thus all three
[07:47] <mardy> Mirv: mmm... no idea, actually, the importance on the bug is not set; but if we have the possibility, of course fixing it everywhere would be better :-)
[07:48] <Mirv> mardy: the main question is whether to OTA Or not, but I guess the answer would be yes, and the bug was filed by QA
[07:48] <Mirv> targeting to OTA-9
[07:50] <Mirv> and then the -gles packages, so 6 qtdeclarative builds for one patch :)
[07:50] <Mirv> so nice, updating three versions. if we'd get 5.5 in xenial, it'd be back to two.
[07:56] <attente> hi, is anyone encountering a bootloop on mako when flashing or updating OTA with devel-proposed?
[08:00] <Mirv> attente: devel-proposed (xenial) does currently get the device stuck at the Google logo, AFAIK (still)
[08:00] <Mirv> attente: last known good image is #336 for mako
[08:01] <Mirv> attente: rc-proposed is the meaningful channel since it has practically all the same fixes without the problems of completely newer Ubuntu version
[08:03] <attente> Mirv: ah, ok, thanks!
[08:04] <attente> Mirv: is there a bug number for this by chance?
[08:07] <Mirv> attente: bug #1512323 at least
[08:08] <attente> Mirv: thanks!
[08:36] <tvoss> Mirv, so devel-proposed is busted for now?
[08:37] <jibel> tvoss, yes, since first xenial build
[08:37] <jibel> tvoss, bug 1512323
[08:38] <tvoss> jibel, ack and thx
[08:53] <robin-hero> Hey! I've just flashed an image to my phone (N4) from the rc (not the rc-proposed) channel. But something is weird, the indicator-datetime is showing the dates not fully translated and wrong order. Is it a bug? It's okay with OTA-7.
[08:56] <jibel> robin-hero, what language did you select, what is the format you see and what is the format you expect?
[09:01] <robin-hero> jibel: Hungarian, some examples: expected: Holnap 8.00 what I see: Tomorrow 08:00, expected: Nov. 21. Szo 9.00 what I see: Szo 21 nov. 09:00
[09:01] <jibel> robin-hero, okay, I'll try. In French it look good so far
[09:01] <jibel> looks*
[09:03] <jibel> robin-hero, could you please file a bug against indicator-datetime https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-datetime/+filebug
[09:03] <jibel> add as much details as possible
[09:06] <robin-hero> jibel: Will do it, just first I want to try something. I downloaded  indicator-datetime.mo and copied it to my phone, now the phone is rebooting...
[09:12] <robin-hero> Hmm, the same...
[09:26] <robin-hero> jibel: filled a bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-datetime/+bug/1515924 Could you mark as you also affected?
[09:41] <robin-hero> sil2100: Hey, could you or somebody take a look at this bug above^^^ ? If more languages are affected too, it is a very serious bug.
[09:45] <popey> thanks robin-hero
[09:49] <robin-hero> popey: for what? :)
[09:50] <popey> bug reports :)
[09:51] <robin-hero> popey: Ah, okay :)
[10:01] <JamesTait> Good morning all; happy Friday, and happy Kindness Day! 😃
[10:07] <sil2100> robin-hero: let me take a look
[10:09] <sil2100> hm, translation issues, we'll have to make sure to get those properly translated on LP
[10:11] <mardy> tvoss: hi! Do we have a way to delete the aiding data from the commandline? If we don't, should I add it to usl-cli?
[10:11] <robin-hero> sil2100: as I see most strings are changed in August with this language, and it is okay with OTA-7, which is released September
[10:12] <tvoss> mardy, we don't, wondering about the use case you have in mind
[10:13] <mardy> tvoss: debugging, to try to reproduce bugs that might happen on cold start
[10:14] <robin-hero> sil2100: And as I see it is translated properly.
[10:14] <tvoss> mardy, ack, makes sense. So I would propose to just add it to the cli, with the cli leveraging providers::gps::AndroidHardwareAbstractionLayer directly instead of talking to the service
[10:14] <tvoss> mardy, will require sudo, but that's fine I think
[10:15] <mardy> tvoss: ah, this will make it easier
[10:16] <tvoss> mardy, *ideally* we would move the gps provider out of process anyway
[10:18] <tvoss> mardy, so with directly talking to the hal, we can easily cover the later on case, too
[10:19] <mardy> tvoss: meanwhile, I updated the MP, and I'd like to write a test for it; any advice if it could fit any of the existing test classes, or anyway where to start from?
[10:20] <tvoss> mardy, will have a look, and give it some thought
[10:20] <mardy> tvoss: thanks
[10:22] <tvoss> mardy, https://code.launchpad.net/~thomas-voss/location-service/adjust-default-timeout-for-gps-xtra-download/+merge/277426
[10:26] <mardy> tvoss: +1
[10:36] <gshmu> help, (remote: flash tools is error)  http://paste.ubuntu.com/13246631/
[12:35] <Mirv> mardy: tsdgeos: hey, what do you consider as proper upstream validation of the silo 046? can you just test your bug and set https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/649 to "Ready for QA", or would you want me to test something more general? I was thinking it not needing AP tests to be run, but I can run some if needed. The best way to test list + grid views is probably manual.
[12:38] <mardy> Mirv: this fix restricts the cases affected by my previous patch, so testing that the unit tests run should be enough (since I tested my previous patch well)
[12:38] <mardy> Mirv: but I'll now install the silo and run some smoke testing, just to be sure
[12:39] <Mirv> mardy: ok, thanks! yes I know it's a refinement to the previous patch.
[12:45] <mardy> Mirv: yep, I meant to say is that it cannot make things *worse* than they were :-)
[12:46] <Mirv> mardy: ah, right!
[13:34] <tsdgeos> Mirv: mardy: if the unity8 bug is fixed, it's an improvement already :d
[13:44] <tvoss> mardy, would you mind giving https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/651 a spin?
[13:45] <mardy> tvoss: sure
[14:41] <mardy> tvoss: do you know how I can accept the HERE licence, after refusing it in the wizard?
[14:45] <popey> mardy, system settings -> security & privacy -> location
[14:45] <mardy> popey: yeah, I don't have it
[14:45] <mardy> popey: do I need to have a SIM card?
[14:46] <popey> hmmm, odd
[14:46] <popey> http://people.canonical.com/~alan/screenshots/device-2015-11-13-144631.png
[14:46] <popey> yours doesn't look like that?
[14:49] <mardy> popey: nope, I have only the options "Use GPS" or nothing at all
[14:49] <mardy> popey: I'm looking at the source code, it checks if here is installed
[14:50] <davmor2> mardy: what image did you flash on what device?
[14:51] <mardy> davmor2: ubuntu-touch/rc-proposed/ubuntu on Nexus 4
[14:51] <davmor2> mardy: there is no here on the ubuntu channel
[14:52] <mardy> davmor2: ah, that explains it then :-)
[14:52] <mardy> thanks
[14:53] <davmor2> mardy: no worries
[15:07] <jgdx> kenvandine, i'll make a small mock for org.gtk.Menus so I can check for regression after the design refresh and slotslayout migration. Are you okay with that? I can do it in a separate branch.
[15:07] <jgdx> kenvandine, *in the wifi panel̈́
[15:07] <kenvandine> jgdx, good idea
[15:07] <kenvandine> separate branch please
[15:08] <kenvandine> but sounds like a great idea
[16:13] <zzarr_> hello!
[18:35] <ogra_> what is history-daemon and why does it eat my phone ?
[18:35] <ogra_> (runs at 600% CPu on my MX4)
[18:36]  * ogra_ reboots that slideshow
[18:49] <jibel> ogra_, which image?
[18:50] <ogra_> todays rc-proposed ....
[18:50] <ogra_> reboot fixed it though
[18:50] <ogra_> i'll keep an eye on it
[18:51] <jibel> ogra_, there is a fix for a crash of history daemon but it is not on a image yet
[18:51] <jibel> should be on next one
[18:51] <ogra_> ah, good
[18:52] <jibel> hm, actually I don't see the publication
[18:53] <jibel> ogra_, for reference it was bug 1514350
[18:54] <ogra_> thx
[20:00] <tvoss> mardy, still around?
[20:29] <studio_> hi
[20:30] <studio_> popey, are you still there?
[20:30] <popey> Hello.
[20:30] <studio_> hi
[20:31] <popey> How are you?
[20:31] <studio_> i have seen, you are co-founder on ubuntu mate, right?
[20:31] <popey> Yes.
[20:32] <studio_> i need an image for my new rpi2, where can i download it?
[20:32] <popey> studio_, https://ubuntu-mate.org/wily/ at the bottom of that page
[20:32] <studio_> btw, i am fine, and you?
[20:32] <popey> Great thanks.
[20:33] <studio_> on the "buttom i get "Mac (PowerPC) and IBM-PPC (POWER5)" but not rpi2 ... ?!
[20:34] <popey> sorry, wrong page, https://ubuntu-mate.org/raspberry-pi/
[20:34] <popey> linked from the previous page
[20:35] <studio_> ahh ... big thanks :)
[20:37] <studio_> back to ubuntu-touch, how do i use the --download-only option in ubuntu-device-flash?
[20:39] <studio_> for exp. "ubuntu-touch/rc-proposed/ubuntu-developer"?
[20:40] <studio_> more nice would be the "ubuntu-touch/devel-proposed/ubuntu" channel ... ;)
[20:40] <studio_> any idea?
[20:46] <popey> studio_, sorry, was afk for a bit.
[20:47] <popey> studio_, ubuntu-device-flash touch --download-only --device=krillin --channel=ubuntu-touch/rc-proposed/ubuntu-developer
[20:49] <studio_> "unknown flag `download-only'"
[20:50] <studio_> i am on 15.10 right here
[20:51] <studio_> that is my problem. is it still working under 14.04?
[20:51] <popey> what version of ubuntu-device-flash do you have?
[20:51] <popey> 0.31-0ubuntu1 here
[20:51] <popey> dpkg -L ubuntu-device-flash
[20:52] <studio_> ubuntu-device-flash --help don't give me an option about version ...
[20:56] <studio_> dpkg tells me ubuntu-device- 0.30-0ubuntu amd64
[20:56] <studio_> how did you get the upgrade to 0.31 ?
[20:59] <studio_> ehm, i used dpkg -l ubuntu-device-flash, not the bid "L" ...
[20:59] <studio_> ehm, i used dpkg -l ubuntu-device-flash, not the big "L" ...
[21:03] <studio_> popey, are you on 16.04?
[21:05] <studio_> popey, "cat /etc/*release" tells me, i am on 15.10
[21:10] <studio_> popey, are you still there?
[21:10] <popey> Sorry, yes, I'm on xenial (16.04)
[21:11] <popey> but you're only one point release difference from me
[21:11] <popey> that command line should work
[21:11] <popey> maybe you mis-typed it?
[21:11] <studio_> ahh, ok i use it on an vitual box image, but on 15.10 the command is not working
[21:12] <studio_> copy and paste, how can i mistype that?
[21:13] <popey> I don't know why that's not working
[21:15] <studio_> ubuntu-device-flash touch --download-only --device=krillin --channel=ubuntu-touch/rc-proposed/ubuntu-developer
[21:15] <studio_> unknown flag `download-only'
[21:15] <studio_> so where is the problem in that command?
[21:16] <genii> Put touch after the options
[21:17] <genii> ( in the manpage this is the order shown)
[21:17] <studio_> same ... "unknown flag `download-only'
[21:20] <genii> studio_: You tried like: ubuntu-device-flash --download-only touch --device=krillin --channel=ubuntu-touch/rc-proposed/ubuntu-developer
[21:21] <studio_> cool, that is working :)
[21:22] <studio_> genii, big thanks :)
[21:25] <genii> studio_: Glad to be of assistance
[21:25] <studio_> have to leave, have a nice weekend, bye all ...