[01:12] <bluesabre> evening folks
[03:16] <Unit193> bluesabre: Hi.
[11:06] <bluesabre> Unit193: hi.
[12:32] <slickymasterWork> flocculant, claimed review of https://code.launchpad.net/~flocculant/xubuntu-docs/qa/+merge/277590
[12:32] <slickymasterWork> I'll take a look at it tonight
[12:33] <slickymasterWork> after the community work :P
[12:34] <flocculant> ok - cya later
[12:35] <slickymasterWork> hf flocculant 
[12:48] <knome> i left a "few" comments there...
[12:48] <knome> some of them you can ignore now - there is commentary on the direction we might want to the take the whole contributor docs
[12:49] <knome> bbl
[12:53] <slickymasterWork> ack knome 
[14:55] <krytarik> knome: "i left a 'few' comments there..." - looks like LP ignored them as well. :P
[14:55] <knome> oh
[14:55] <knome> right
[14:55] <knome> i should have hit save
[14:55] <knome> SIGH
[14:55] <krytarik> lol
[14:55] <knome> i always forget that
[14:56] <knome> oh
[14:56] <knome> there they are
[14:56] <knome> \o/
[14:56]  * knome goes hit save
[14:56] <krytarik> \o/
[14:56] <knome> done
[15:12] <knome> flocculant, the www. logging issue should be solved now
[15:52] <flocculant> I left some replies to some comments
[15:52] <flocculant> knome: ack
[15:53] <knome> flocculant, you didn't
[15:53] <knome> flocculant, hit save
[15:53] <flocculant> hah
[15:54] <knome> flocculant, re: linking; i mean do we want to keep making xref's to the spots that talk about ISO/package testing when we write about the
[15:55] <knome> flocculant, and re: xfef markup, np; i know it's not mentioned anywhere (yet)
[15:55] <knome> and re: the last comment, yes, let's see how it goes
[15:55] <flocculant> knome: that's why I'm confused - there is no link to that? 
[15:56] <knome> huh, now you lost me; re what was that? :D
[15:56] <flocculant> Meta: Do we want to keep linking to the package and ISO testing sections?
[15:56] <flocculant> that :)
[15:56] <knome> ah
[15:57] <knome> context:
Scheduling of ISO, and when appropriate Package, Testing should take place amongst the QA Team.
[15:57] <knome> question: do we want to do:
Scheduling of <xref linkend="..." />, and when appropriate Package, Testing should take place amongst the QA Team.
[15:58] <flocculant> no 
[15:58] <knome> probably not here, but it was a more meta question for general use
[15:58] <knome> eg. should we try to interlink as much as possible
[15:58] <flocculant> imho these are cont docs not support - I would expect that someone contributing should be able to do so with the minimum of handholding
[15:58] <knome> :)
[15:59] <knome> it's not only handholding, in some places it's useful that you have the link to the target right there
[15:59] <knome> at least imo
[15:59] <flocculant> I'm +1 to linking to things once 
[15:59] <knome> yep
[16:00] <flocculant> but as testing is the subject of a chapter I'm pretty relaxed it's not linked there
[16:00] <knome> mhm
[16:00] <flocculant> oh 
[16:01] <flocculant> mmm
[16:01] <flocculant> no it's not :D
[16:02] <flocculant> ok - I'll get links added 
[16:02] <knome> :D
[16:02] <knome> there's one problem with that
[16:02] <knome> you can't affect the link text
[16:02] <knome> so in some cases, you might just want to add a <note> for the xref's
[16:03] <knome> but it really depends on the context
[16:03] <flocculant> I might add a note to the top for the places QA needs to know about
[16:03] <knome> yep
[16:03] <knome> or maybe a section that lists them all
[16:03] <knome> and a note that links to that
[16:03] <flocculant> text full of links drives me nuts 
[16:03] <knome> to save space
[16:03] <knome> and effort...
[16:07] <flocculant> knome: maybe that section should be elsewhere - Important Places or in the How to's 
[16:09] <flocculant> just not call it How to's 
[16:10] <knome> yes, maybe so
[16:10] <flocculant> there's going to be other similar things come up in future I would guess
[16:17] <flocculant> knome: I'll fix those things now - I'll add a section for links to one of mine for the moment, we can move it later when we decide one way or the other 
[16:21] <knome> cheers
[16:43] <flocculant> knome: done that for the moment then
[16:43] <flocculant> and the odd fixes
[17:31] <krytarik> knome: Btw, as much as I like having to work on my docs MP, but... :P - http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2015/11/13/%23xubuntu-devel.html#t14:52
[17:31] <krytarik> + not
[17:32] <krytarik> (Particularly the first question.)
[17:36] <knome> probably
[17:36] <knome> i'll get back to this later today
[17:36] <knome> actually, i think i have 8 minutes now
[17:36] <knome> :P
[17:36] <knome> let's see...
[17:37] <knome> actually, meh
[17:37] <knome> there is no button for one-time export :(
[17:38] <knome> i'll just set up the auto export
[17:38] <knome> and let it run once
[17:38] <knome> ok?
[17:38] <knome> done
[17:38] <knome> should happen some time soon
[17:38] <knome> like, midnight UTC
[17:41] <krytarik> Nah, like 6 AM UTC, but that's ok. :)
[17:42] <krytarik> Thought there was though.
[17:42] <knome> i thought too
[17:42] <knome> there's that button for one-time imports
[17:44] <krytarik> Eww, nope indeed - only "or requesting a one-off download through the web interface" - https://help.launchpad.net/Translations/YourProject/Exports
[17:44] <knome> yep
[17:44] <knome> that wouldn't be completely awful either, but meh, why detour
[17:45] <krytarik> Yeah, no problem.
[17:46] <krytarik> Also, flocculant's current MP should be merged by then too.
[17:46] <knome> i can probably take care of that if slickymasterWork fails to do that :P
[17:48] <knome> now... bbl
[17:48] <knome> hf meanwhile
[22:13] <slickymaster> knome, to what are you referring in "Do we want to keep linking to the package and ISO testing sections?"?
[22:13] <knome> slickymaster, <xref ... />
[22:14] <slickymaster> oh, ok
[22:14] <slickymaster> I don't see any reason why he wouldn't, knome 
[22:14] <slickymaster> I mean, it's just a link, nothing more
[22:15] <knome> if you read the discussion in the backlog, you would notice he added the links now
[22:15] <knome> aiui, haven't checked the new MP
[22:15] <knome> or updated
[22:15] <slickymaster> 7me hasn't read the backlog
[22:16] <knome> sigh :)
[22:17] <slickymaster> going to answer to your comment in the MP, knome 
[22:17] <slickymaster> even because I won't merge it today
[22:18] <knome> krytarik, SEE?!
[22:18] <slickymaster> he also forgot to add that dot at the end of the paragraph
[22:18] <krytarik> knome: Heh.
[22:18] <slickymaster> what?????
[22:18] <knome> nothing.
[22:18] <krytarik> lol
[22:18] <slickymaster> is there a poll running?
[22:19] <slickymaster> what were the odds against merging it?
[22:19] <knome> no poll, it was pure knowledge
[22:19] <knome> that you would fail to merge it today
[22:19] <slickymaster> it's not my fault
[22:20] <knome> of *course* not :)
[22:20] <knome> besides, we didn't bet for the reason
[22:20] <slickymaster> the MP isn't ready for merge
[22:20] <knome> well... you can merge it as is
[22:20] <knome> :P
[22:20] <knome> or fix it while merging
[22:21] <slickymaster> most probably the later option
[23:18] <slickymaster> flocculant, knome, I left some comments the MP
[23:19] <knome> again? :P
[23:19] <knome> slickymaster, did you click save?
[23:19] <slickymaster> what again?
[23:19] <knome> oh, for some reason they were hidden
[23:19] <slickymaster> I hit CTRL+Enter
[23:20] <slickymaster> in all cases it's mergerd
[23:20] <slickymaster> -r
[23:20] <knome> er mi gerd
[23:20] <knome> :P
[23:20] <slickymaster> :P
[23:22] <knome> oh great
[23:22] <knome> i just noticed there was a gig yesterday i would have wanted to attend
[23:22] <knome> sigh
[23:22] <slickymaster> -devel alert
[23:22] <knome> oh