| === natefinch-afk is now known as natefinch | ||
| lamont | lets say I have juju 1.24.7-0ubuntu1~14.04.1, and I want to juju deploy local:xenial/foo... is there some obvious reason that the service winds up in this state: | 03:46 |
|---|---|---|
| lamont | service-status: | 03:46 |
| lamont | current: unknown | 03:46 |
| lamont | message: Waiting for agent initialization to finish | 03:46 |
| lamont | since: 19 Nov 2015 03:45:05Z | 03:46 |
| mgz | lamont: what status is the machine in? | 03:46 |
| lamont | nova? doesn't exist at all | 03:47 |
| lamont | interestingly, local:wily/foo gets me machine-2 | 03:47 |
| mgz | weeelll... that would be why the agent isn;t up | 03:47 |
| lamont | service-status: | 03:47 |
| lamont | current: maintenance | 03:47 |
| lamont | message: installing charm software | 03:47 |
| lamont | since: 19 Nov 2015 03:47:45Z | 03:47 |
| lamont | that's with local:wily/foo | 03:48 |
| lamont | mgz: is there some easy way to cause juju to spill what command it's using for "nova boot"? | 03:49 |
| mgz | lxc-ls --fancy gives you a view under the hood, as does $JUJU_HOME/$ENV/* | 03:49 |
| mgz | er, meph | 03:50 |
| lamont | no lxcs involved... this is openstack | 03:50 |
| mgz | I was imagining containers where none exist | 03:50 |
| lamont | can I have multiple series (trusty,wily,xenial) in one juju environment? | 03:50 |
| mgz | for the true story, you need the nova logs | 03:50 |
| lamont | as in nova host api logs on the api host? | 03:51 |
| mgz | but machine-0.log will tell you what the provisioner tried to do | 03:51 |
| lamont | ah! | 03:51 |
| mgz | it may be something as simple as nova not having a xenial image | 03:51 |
| lamont | nova image-list| grep xenial | 03:52 |
| lamont | | 00e59d4a-b4a5-4b27-8cf9-3fe2bcd0fb79 | ubuntu-xenial-daily-amd64-server-20151105-disk1.img | ACTIVE | | | 03:52 |
| lamont | ^^ that's why I thought I could do this | 03:52 |
| mgz | okay, but how does juju know about that image? | 03:53 |
| lamont | 2015-11-19 03:45:07 ERROR juju.provisioner provisioner_task.go:630 cannot find tools for machine "1": no matching tools available | 03:53 |
| mgz | did you also update local simplestreams | 03:53 |
| lamont | bingo! | 03:53 |
| lamont | apparently not | 03:53 |
| mgz | ...and also it couldn't find xenial tools | 03:53 |
| * lamont goes to poke his admins | 03:53 | |
| mgz | okay, we haven't published xenial tools yet, because there are no xenial cloud-images yet, and our build chain expects that | 03:55 |
| lamont | oh! | 03:55 |
| lamont | well then | 03:55 |
| mgz | in practice, the tools would be identical to wily's | 03:55 |
| lamont | mgz: any eta? (meanwhile, I'll do the wily + upgrade-in-place-while-crying | 03:55 |
| lamont | guessing step 1 is poke the cloud-images people? | 03:56 |
| mgz | yeah, they're trying to change the method they're making images, which is the hang up | 03:57 |
| lamont | ack | 03:59 |
| === axw_ is now known as axw | ||
| jamespage | adam_g, hey - you should hook up with gnuoy, coreycb and thedac as they are about to write three new openstack charms - all based on the new reactive framework which is our standard now | 07:57 |
| ionutbalutoiu | hi, jamespage. Update MP with the unit tests as you advised. Can you take a look whenever you can ? (https://code.launchpad.net/~ionutbalutoiu/charms/trusty/neutron-gateway/next/+merge/276833) | 10:36 |
| jamespage | ionutbalutoiu, on my list for today | 10:37 |
| ionutbalutoiu | jamespage, just as a note, amulet tests didn't run yet for this update (only lint_test and unit_test), but it's been two days. I think we have to wait for this as well. Just wanted to give you a ping. Is it common such a delay for amulet tests ? | 10:40 |
| jamespage | ionutbalutoiu, long queue in the lab right now as we keep enabling new tests for each charm | 10:41 |
| jamespage | its possible something is blocked up - I'll check | 10:41 |
| jamespage | ionutbalutoiu, if not I'll run them myself... | 10:41 |
| ionutbalutoiu | good, thank-you. | 10:41 |
| jamespage | ionutbalutoiu, tbh I'd be happy to land without those reporting in as they passed before, and you've made 0 code change that would impact that since then | 10:42 |
| jamespage | but lets see | 10:42 |
| lazypower | o/ mornin jamespage | 10:45 |
| jamespage | hey lazypower | 11:22 |
| lazypower | jamespage did you see the somewhat silent post yesterday about charming w/ layers interview feat. Adam Stokes? | 11:23 |
| jamespage | lazypower, I did - started to watch but then got children | 11:24 |
| jamespage | so had to stop | 11:24 |
| jamespage | will resume later today | 11:24 |
| lazypower | :D just wanted ot make sure it crossed your radar as i know your team is about to go head first in reactive/layer territory | 11:24 |
| lazypower | to anyone lurking that didn't catch the update - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lowRfWcxky0 | 11:25 |
| jamespage | gnuoy, coreycb, thedac, ddellav, rockstar, beisner ^^ | 11:28 |
| gnuoy | ta | 11:29 |
| tvansteenburgh | anyone know how to get the ID of the currently executing juju action from inside the action itself? | 14:26 |
| tvansteenburgh | i've seen other code using JUJU_ACTION_ID, but it's not set, and I don't see any mention of that env var in the docs | 14:27 |
| === danilos` is now known as danilos | ||
| tvansteenburgh | ah, it's JUJU_ACTION_UUID | 14:43 |
| === ericsnow-afk is now known as ericsnow | ||
| stub | Register the decorated function to run when not all desired_states are active. | 15:06 |
| stub | Which does not mean when all desired_states are not active. | 15:06 |
| stub | tvansteenburgh: I look in charmhelpers.core.hookenv() for those :) | 15:08 |
| stub | So we get an AND operation with @when and an OR with @when_not. But I think I might stick with a single state per decorator for now until I get the hang of this ;) | 15:10 |
| === dpm is now known as dpm-afk | ||
| === natefinch is now known as natefinch-afk | ||
| jcastro | rick_h_: we're 7 subscriptions short of the 100 we need to get the custom URL for the youtube channel, can you ask for one more push across the board? | 17:58 |
| rick_h_ | jcastro: sure thing | 17:59 |
| rick_h_ | jcastro: sent, included cloud@ as well this time so hopefully moves fast for you. | 18:03 |
| jcastro | <3 | 18:04 |
| rick_h_ | jcastro: <3 jane's reply | 18:06 |
| === natefinch-afk is now known as natefinch | ||
| rick_h_ | jcastro: and done! woot | 18:28 |
| === JoshStrobl is now known as JoshStrobl|AFK | ||
| natefinch | rick_h_: sort of sad that a 600 person company has trouble getting 100 subscriptions to their own youtube channel ;) | 18:58 |
| rick_h_ | natefinch: naw, it got through pretty well. Folks just need reminders :) | 19:02 |
| adam_g | gnuoy, coreycb thedac are there any examples out there of openstack charms using the reactive framework? | 19:26 |
| gnuoy | adam_g, there is one I think | 19:27 |
| * gnuoy is looking for the link | 19:27 | |
| gnuoy | adam_g, https://code.launchpad.net/~openstack-charmers/charms/trusty/openvswitch-odl/next | 19:28 |
| adam_g | gnuoy, thanks. | 19:28 |
| gnuoy | adam_g, the directory layout is a little outdated though | 19:28 |
| gnuoy | reactive should be a top level dir I think | 19:28 |
| adam_g | also--i seem to remember at least one place in the openstack charms where a charm would go and create neutron networks and subnets in neutron using neutronclient as part of a hook. does that still exist? | 19:31 |
| adam_g | i need to do something similar but can't remember where that was done | 19:31 |
| gnuoy | adam_g, are you thinking of http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ost-maintainers/openstack-charm-testing/trunk/view/head:/bin/quantum-ext-net | 19:32 |
| gnuoy | adam_g, oh, as aprt of a hook | 19:32 |
| adam_g | gnuoy, oh ya, that was it | 19:32 |
| gnuoy | adam_g, also http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ost-maintainers/openstack-charm-testing/trunk/view/head:/bin/quantum-tenant-net | 19:33 |
| adam_g | gnuoy, okay, so those dont actuallyg et called as part of a hook | 19:33 |
| gnuoy | adam_g, nope, I can't think of a hook that does that | 19:33 |
| adam_g | as part of my services deployment, i need to go and create a network in neutron on behalf of the service tenant | 19:34 |
| coreycb | adam_g, btw we're in the midst of creating a base openstack layer and inteface layers for rmq, mysql, keystone, etc | 19:34 |
| adam_g | coreycb, cool. im kinda operating on a tight schedule so im not sure ill be able to adapt that just yet. :\ unless all that stuff is about done and ready to use now. | 19:35 |
| gnuoy | adam_g, that's going to be a pain I would think | 19:35 |
| gnuoy | I mean creating the network | 19:35 |
| adam_g | gnuoy, yeah, i was trying to find a good way to make that fit yesterday | 19:35 |
| adam_g | gnuoy, best i could come with is have neutron-api expose a setting in its relatoin that lets other services know that neutron at least has: keystone, db, rabbit relations | 19:36 |
| adam_g | then have the other end do what it needs once thats true | 19:36 |
| gnuoy | adam_g, fwiw we already have a concept of the charm being ready (all mandatory relations and config satisfied) | 19:37 |
| gnuoy | it;s spat out in the workload status | 19:37 |
| adam_g | gnuoy, right but isnt that just user facing? i cant block relatin A's hooks on the status of B+C+D ? | 19:38 |
| bdx_ | charmers, core, dev: Hey whats up everyone? I am finally getting my feet wet and jumping into charming with reactive.... I'm trying to react to the changing of specific configs on config-changed hook, is there a best practice for checking for config change for specific configs? heres what I'm working with...https://github.com/jamesbeedy/puppet-agent/blob/master/reactive/puppet_agent.py | 19:38 |
| gnuoy | adam_g, yes, you're right. I just meant the charm already has a concept of what it needs to be ready | 19:39 |
| adam_g | gnuoy, yeah, AIUI that unfortunately doesnt help here | 19:39 |
| adam_g | i think all i need from neutron-api is a flag i can pass to other services that says 'the api is functional and you can create things' | 19:40 |
| adam_g | should be fine if that were happen before the rest of neutron is wired (neutron-gateway and cooresponding compute agents) | 19:40 |
| gnuoy | adam_g, yep, it seems reasonable. I'd like to see what jamespage thinks too as he was pondering a similiar issue recently | 19:43 |
| adam_g | cool | 19:43 |
| adam_g | i might get something functional later this afternoon and push it somewhere | 19:44 |
| tvansteenburgh | bdx_: you can do `if config.changed(key)` | 19:56 |
| bdx_ | tvansteenburgh: ha...I knew it was something simple....thanks! | 19:57 |
| === blr_ is now known as blr | ||
| === thumper is now known as thumper-afk | ||
| bdx_ | 2-vcpu_4-gb-ram_20-gb-hd | 20:52 |
| === thumper-afk is now known as thumper | ||
| === natefinch is now known as natefinch-afk | ||
| === ericsnow is now known as ericsnow-afk | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!