=== tdaitx_ is now known as tdaitx
tdaitxdoko, hi! so, openjdk 6b37 source is available on debian, are you planning to sync that to ubuntu any time soon? my interest in this is to decide whether I upload a new package for the security team or just wait for a Xenial one and backport it20:51
dokotdaitx, now done, and filed https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-6/+bug/151807320:54
dokohmm, tdaitx, did you check that the generated control file is the same?20:55
tdaitxdoko, only on openjdk 7 it was the same, for openjdk 6 there were a few differences20:57
tdaitxdoko, I mean, between wily and xenial20:57
tdaitxdoko, on openjdk7 the d/control file was the same for xenial and wily IIRC20:58
tdaitxas for openjdk 6 it was slight different between wily and xenial20:59
tdaitx(on openjdk 6 dependencies were declared as '>=' on wily and '=' on xenial)20:59
tdaitxdoko, does that answer your questions or did I get your question wrong?21:00
dokotdaitx, right, so we probably have to unify this, or regenerate the control file before upload21:01
tdaitxdoko, the d/control for the openjdk6 package I pointed you to was for Xenial, did you regenerate it for unstable before the upload?21:02
dokoI'll have a look what we can unify. we can discard the >=/= diffs because we don't need to support lucid anymore21:03
tdaitxdoko, oh, that was from lucid21:03
tdaitxI didn't know21:04
tdaitxdoko, is it ok to remove those older versions as well? should we do it for this update?21:06
dokono, has time21:09

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!