=== pete-woods1 is now known as pete-woods [10:39] * lamont is curious why bcache-tools/precise-proposed is "pending publication" still, when the binaries were accepted 17 hours ago.. Do the binaries still need NEW processing or something? [11:01] lamont: yes: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/+queue [11:02] rbasak: wonderful url. thanks. now I just need to find me an AA.. [11:03] * rbasak throws something into NEW too [11:06] ^^ this is renamed from nagios-plugins. It'll presumably need overriding to main? [11:13] lamont: done [11:20] ta === michihenning is now known as michi [13:41] Hello everyone! I disabled the system-image importer temporarily [13:42] Will re-enable after image promotion === nudtrobert1 is now known as nudtrobert [14:14] Laney: aha, cheers for fixing ltt-control [14:14] Laney: gdnsd is I think the other bit [14:43] i forgot to ask, but i assume we are merging from unstable, rather than testing for the LTS. [14:43] cause we are good like that. [14:44] Yes. [15:09] cjwatson: ah, bah, didn't notice that one [15:45] xnox: Yeah, we gave up on the whole sync-from-testing thing, it caused more issues than it solved, and having our own britney deal with most of what we were trying to solve. === tdaitx_ is now known as tdaitx [16:10] infinity: hello! You indicated that I should talk to you at a later time regarding the electrum retroactive 'dummy'fication of the package? If you're busy I'll bother you another day :) [16:11] teward: I'm always busy, so that's not the best factor in deciding when to bug me. [16:12] :P [16:12] teward: Did you get all debdiffy and come up with what you think is a sane plan? [16:12] infinity: yeah, except THAT bug got duped to the original bug [16:12] rather than kept separate [16:12] (so the 'blacklist' bug shows as the master, and I don't have access for some reason to undo it) [16:13] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/electrum/+bug/1499094 was the "replace with dummy packages" bug. the related was the blacklist and removal from W-series bug [16:13] teward: Ahh, well, we can flip that around. [16:13] teward: Or undup them entirely. [16:13] mathew-hodson... [16:13] hmm [16:13] well they're not on any dev team just messing with bugs and their bug control [16:13] I'd undupe them IMO [16:14] THERE's the undupe button it didn't show previously [16:14] attached to the bug i linked were debdiffs for review (essentially emulating what was done with bitcoin) [16:14] teward: Done. [16:14] infinity: thanks. [16:15] they only 'recently' got addressed in the sponsoring queue... nobody goes to check on series nominations apparently [16:16] then closed as a dupe of the original blacklist-and-remove bug (which didn't seem the correct approach to me) [16:16] s/got addressed in/landed on/ [16:18] infinity: Want to promote libfuture-perl libstruct-dumb-perl libio-async-perl for lintian? [16:19] Laney: I would like nothing more. [16:19] Happy to please, then [16:31] cjwatson: gdnsd uploaded, thanks for the heads up [16:58] can someone process django-piston3 binaries out of https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial/+queue and into reality? [17:28] lamont: are python*-django-piston3-dbg meant to actually contain useful content of some kind? [17:28] they kinda don't right now [17:29] cjwatson: can I get away with calling that a bug? [17:29] because, yeah, prolly [17:29] maybe [17:29] probably, it's not directly harmful [17:29] ta [17:43] bdmurray, can you promote ceilometer from vivid-proposed? [18:26] coreycb: it doesn't seem to be tagged verification-done yet [18:27] bdmurray, ok I'll tag it, it's been verified [18:29] bdmurray, it's tagged now, thanks [18:30] okay, there you go