[10:39]  * lamont is curious why bcache-tools/precise-proposed is "pending publication" still, when the binaries were accepted 17 hours ago..  Do the binaries still need NEW processing or something?
[11:01] <rbasak> lamont: yes: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/+queue
[11:02] <lamont> rbasak: wonderful url.  thanks.  now I just need to find me an AA..
[11:03]  * rbasak throws something into NEW too
[11:06] <rbasak> ^^ this is renamed from nagios-plugins. It'll presumably need overriding to main?
[11:13] <cjwatson> lamont: done
[11:20] <lamont> ta
[13:41] <sil2100> Hello everyone! I disabled the system-image importer temporarily
[13:42] <sil2100> Will re-enable after image promotion
[14:14] <cjwatson> Laney: aha, cheers for fixing ltt-control
[14:14] <cjwatson> Laney: gdnsd is I think the other bit
[14:43] <xnox> i forgot to ask, but i assume we are merging from unstable, rather than testing for the LTS.
[14:43] <xnox> cause we are good like that.
[14:44] <cjwatson> Yes.
[15:09] <Laney> cjwatson: ah, bah, didn't notice that one
[15:45] <infinity> xnox: Yeah, we gave up on the whole sync-from-testing thing, it caused more issues than it solved, and having our own britney deal with most of what we were trying to solve.
[16:10] <teward> infinity: hello!  You indicated that I should talk to you at a later time regarding the electrum retroactive 'dummy'fication of the package?  If you're busy I'll bother you another day :)
[16:11] <infinity> teward: I'm always busy, so that's not the best factor in deciding when to bug me.
[16:12] <teward> :P
[16:12] <infinity> teward: Did you get all debdiffy and come up with what you think is a sane plan?
[16:12] <teward> infinity: yeah, except THAT bug got duped to the original bug
[16:12] <teward> rather than kept separate
[16:12] <teward> (so the 'blacklist' bug shows as the master, and I don't have access for some reason to undo it)
[16:13] <teward> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/electrum/+bug/1499094 was the "replace with dummy packages" bug.  the related was the blacklist and removal from W-series bug
[16:13] <infinity> teward: Ahh, well, we can flip that around.
[16:13] <infinity> teward: Or undup them entirely.
[16:13] <teward> mathew-hodson...
[16:13] <teward> hmm
[16:13] <teward> well they're not on any dev team just messing with bugs and their bug control
[16:13] <teward> I'd undupe them IMO
[16:14] <teward> THERE's the undupe button it didn't show previously
[16:14] <teward> attached to the bug i linked were debdiffs for review (essentially emulating what was done with bitcoin)
[16:14] <infinity> teward: Done.
[16:14] <teward> infinity: thanks.
[16:15] <teward> they only 'recently' got addressed in the sponsoring queue... nobody goes to check on series nominations apparently
[16:16] <teward> then closed as a dupe of the original blacklist-and-remove bug (which didn't seem the correct approach to me)
[16:16] <teward> s/got addressed in/landed on/
[16:18] <Laney> infinity: Want to promote libfuture-perl libstruct-dumb-perl libio-async-perl for lintian?
[16:19] <infinity> Laney: I would like nothing more.
[16:19] <Laney> Happy to please, then
[16:31] <Laney> cjwatson: gdnsd uploaded, thanks for the heads up
[16:58] <lamont> can someone process django-piston3 binaries out of https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial/+queue and into reality?
[17:28] <cjwatson> lamont: are python*-django-piston3-dbg meant to actually contain useful content of some kind?
[17:28] <cjwatson> they kinda don't right now
[17:29] <lamont> cjwatson: can I get away with calling that a bug?
[17:29] <lamont> because, yeah, prolly
[17:29] <lamont> maybe
[17:29] <cjwatson> probably, it's not directly harmful
[17:29] <lamont> ta
[17:43] <coreycb> bdmurray, can you promote ceilometer from vivid-proposed?
[18:26] <bdmurray> coreycb: it doesn't seem to be tagged verification-done yet
[18:27] <coreycb> bdmurray, ok I'll tag it, it's been verified
[18:29] <coreycb> bdmurray, it's tagged now, thanks
[18:30] <bdmurray> okay, there you go