=== dkessel_ is now known as dkessel [12:10] !team | reminder: feature definition freeze is next thursday, let's try to get the blueprints ready before that [12:10] reminder: feature definition freeze is next thursday, let's try to get the blueprints ready before that: bluesabre, dkessel, flocculant, jjfrv8, knome, krytarik, lderan, micahg, Noskcaj, ochosi, pleia2, slickymaster, Unit193 [15:07] slickymaster, knome: Done - https://code.launchpad.net/~krytarik/xubuntu-docs/contributor/+merge/278262 [15:12] knome: And please set my work item to 'DONE' too, when you merged it. [15:12] krytarik, hmm, do we really want the itemizedlists inside paras? [15:13] we're not doing that anywhere [15:13] Yes! [15:13] why? [15:13] Wait. [15:13] yes. [15:14] only one place too [15:15] Where do you see that? I know I fixed some on the QA Team page. [15:16] I was more thinking the other way around, where I added more than one once. :P [15:16] line 893 of the diff [15:18] Ah yes, that's because it doesn't like that in an 'abstract'. [15:18] aha... [15:18] Didn't validate. [15:18] hrm. [15:18] i wonder how the html output looks [15:18] The same really. [15:19] Just like the 'note' one. [15:19] eghh [15:19] we really should try to see other options than abstract for the introduction [15:19] it isn't even semantic [15:19] And it doesn't like sections without any elements other than the title either. :P [15:20] yeah [15:20] So I had "" at one place. :P [15:20] yep [15:21] what's the idea with the new index.html for startpage? [15:21] 'sed' basically, rather than put together. [15:21] ok [15:22] i know it's valid, but i don't particularly like this syntax: + padding: 3em 3em 1em; [15:23] also, we should just use the same stylesheet for the startpage [15:23] but that can wait [15:23] Yeah, we should. [15:25] Ah, you mean rather specify them all - yeah, I can agree there. [15:25] yep [15:26] Particularly when you're already up to 3 anyway. :P [15:26] yep [15:26] 2 is ok [15:26] Yeah. [15:26] 3 is the one that is meh :P [15:26] So go fix that. :P [15:27] hahahahaha! [15:27] :X [15:27] lol [15:28] I usually just put there as much as is necessary, that is. [15:29] heh [15:30] so, on relativity... [15:30] we will need one link for startpage :P [15:30] well actually not [15:30] if we don't care how the startpage looks before building [15:31] Huh? :D [15:31] nvm [15:35] hi knome krytarik [15:35] Hi flocculant. [15:36] hello flocculant [15:55] krytarik, and i'm wondering about the makefile targets too [15:56] and my brain hurts [15:56] Yeah, Makefile stuff does that to one... :D [16:02] epub sigh [16:04] Yeah, at least they kind of "work" now again. :P [16:04] what is "-cp ..." ? [16:04] They look horrible though, that is. :D [16:04] Ignore errors. [16:04] ok [16:10] ok, i think i fixed it [16:20] feed xubuntu-docs had 13 updates, showing the latest 3 [17:46] Well -cp means you don't echo it. [17:56] Unit193: Nope, that's '@'. [18:14] knome: This is what I have right now on top of your current branch, however - barring the needed style fixes for the startpage mentioned in -offtopic: http://paste.openstack.org/show/CC7IP1SJM4guDL4v1yzp/ [18:15] I trust it's easy for you to fix those. :) [18:18] Oooooh, right! [18:28] knome: If you'd just refer to my review in the commit log, that'd be nice - so I don't have to comment. :D [18:37] (Which would just be a link to the diff paste anyway.) [19:22] krytarik, i changed the filename because i wanted to highlight that it's the startpage specific stuff [19:28] knome: Yeah, it's easier to distinguish in the index file anyway. [20:54] knome: Oh crap, it should be "html-style: ../common-libs" in 'user-docs/Makefile' - I seem to have not saved that before doing the diff. >_< [21:02] + too [21:03] ahahahaha [21:03] lol [21:03] It's the little things, you know! :P [21:06] You don't need a new diff though, right? :D [21:07] knome: no pictures yet (see ticket) but a draft of the next xubuntu at post is up if you want to proof https://xubuntu.org/?p=3597&preview=true [21:08] pleia2, i'll look at it later today [21:08] knome: thanks :) [22:20] pleia2, "Also, we understand the positive aspects of giving the user access to modify as it can lead to a better function and understanding of the software." [22:20] pleia2, modify what? [22:21] pleia2, "First of all we believed that this platform better suited the needs of our organization." [22:21] pleia2, better than what? or "best" ? [22:22] pleia2, "Is there anything else you wish to share with us about FreeGeek Chicago or how you use Xubuntu?" [22:22] pleia2, maybe we should drop the "or how you use Xubuntu?" since they don't mention it again [22:23] pleia2, apart from that, i did some very minor edits (remove a comma, "open-source" -> "open source", "FireFox" -> "Firefox")