=== pixel is now known as Guest33114 | ||
=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
=== Guest33114 is now known as pixel_ | ||
=== pixel_ is now known as Guest234612 | ||
alan_g | alf_: are you getting somewhere with CI failure? | 09:23 |
---|---|---|
alf_ | alan_g: I have a few things I want to try (experimental MPs), but got blocked by the Display.* failures | 09:26 |
alf_ | alan_g: I am close to an MP for the new failures, so I should have some results soon. | 09:27 |
alan_g | alf_: cool, thanks. | 09:27 |
=== Guest234612 is now known as pixel_ | ||
slvn_ | hello ! | 12:31 |
slvn_ | I have some issue to debug maybe someone can help : | 12:31 |
slvn_ | I have an app on ubuntu-phone that tries to go fullscreen, but the top status bar is always there. | 12:32 |
slvn_ | if I use "mir_surface_spec_set_state( fullscreen )" before creating the surface, it works. | 12:33 |
slvn_ | but I try to use it after creating the surface, using "apply_spec" it does not work ... | 12:33 |
slvn_ | there is no error message .. the request just seem to be discarded ... any idea ? | 12:33 |
alan_g | slvn_: I suspect that surface modification requests are not supported by unity8/qtmir yet. | 12:35 |
alan_g | I know that greyback_ and I are planning to do some work on the qtmir aspects starting tomorrow | 12:37 |
slvn_ | well ... maybe this is the good reason ... | 12:37 |
greyback_ | slvn_: unfortunately yes, that's not working yet on the unity8 side | 12:38 |
slvn_ | I have also tried to call the function "mir_wait_for( mir_surface_set_state(fullscreen) )" after the surface_create, and this one was working. | 12:38 |
slvn_ | does this make sense ? | 12:38 |
greyback_ | slvn_: not really, but I think you've hit a code-path we've not tried yet. Would you log a bug please? | 12:40 |
greyback_ | slvn_: please log against the project "qtmir" | 12:40 |
mcphail | slvn_: can you post the bug number here so I can follow it? Keen to see this improved | 12:41 |
slvn_ | hmm ... I dont really know what to log, because to me, the mir_wait_for(..) is expected to be working ! I saw this code in lp:qtubuntu when doing SetfullScreen | 12:42 |
alan_g | slvn_: it makes sense in that there are some (essentially legacy) functions that are supported, but the apply_spec is the (not working yet) future. | 12:42 |
alan_g | Unfortunately the qtmir/u8 support for "apply_spec" got delayed as there were more urgent priorities. | 12:44 |
slvn_ | ok, I got it ! just get confused because there was no error, and wasn't working | 12:44 |
slvn_ | you want me to fill a bug report for which part ? | 12:45 |
slvn_ | since, I have an explanation I am fine :) | 12:45 |
alan_g | "apply_spec" not supported by qtmir/u8 | 12:45 |
slvn_ | ok ! | 12:46 |
mzanetti | anpok, ping | 12:51 |
slvn_ | https://bugs.launchpad.net/qtmir/+bug/1519338 | 12:52 |
ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1519338 in QtMir "API "mir_surface_apply_spec" is not supported in qtmir/u8 " [Undecided,New] | 12:52 |
mcphail | greyback_: aww - give it a "High" priority - medium bugs are never fixed :p | 12:54 |
greyback_ | mcphail: it'll be fixed :) Especially as we'll definitely be moving to the newer way (apply_spec) | 12:55 |
mcphail | greyback_: cheers :) | 12:58 |
=== alan_g is now known as alan_g|lunch | ||
=== alan_g|lunch is now known as alan_g | ||
anpok | mzanetti: pong? | 13:57 |
mzanetti | hey anpok | 13:57 |
mzanetti | anpok, https://code.launchpad.net/~mzanetti/unity8/uinput/+merge/277572/comments/704818 | 13:57 |
=== chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
=== charles_ is now known as charles | ||
=== pixel is now known as Guest60410 | ||
=== dandrader is now known as dandrader|afk | ||
=== dandrader|afk is now known as dandrader | ||
=== dandrader is now known as dandrader|afk | ||
=== dandrader|afk is now known as dandrader |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!