[02:41] <ubottu> daftykins called the ops in #ubuntu ()
[02:42] <h00k> genii: took me a bit to figure out who it was being called in
[02:43] <genii> I booted both
[02:43] <genii> No +b yet, we'll see who comes back
[02:44] <h00k> g did
[02:44] <h00k> It was confusing, it looked like copypasta lines but I don't see the original lines,
[02:44] <h00k> I was trying to read too quickly.
[02:47] <genii> h00k: kleesiger seems to be the issue. Has not returned since being booted. Gave gzcwnk a warning with instructions what to do next time. So far so good.
[07:49] <ubottu> lotuspsychje called the ops in #ubuntu (guest-iYLSLd)
[17:37] <mapps> hello
[17:37] <mapps> why was i banned AGAIN?
[17:37] <mapps> for telling the truth , seems a bit unfair
[17:37] <phunyguy> mapps, my guess is for promoting violence
[17:38] <mapps> aha
[17:40] <tonyyarusso> Called for nuking a country, labelled an entire nation as terrorist sympathizers, said Turks were a disgrace, said they shouldn't be allowed into the EU...not a short list.
[17:40] <mapps> yea
[17:41] <mapps> that's all true though, i dont dispute it
[17:41] <mapps> who would want them in the eu / read the papers they support isis!! i dont make it up
[17:42] <tonyyarusso> Well, that's really not helping your case then.
[17:42] <phunyguy> mapps, true or not, it's not something we allow in the channels.
[17:42] <mapps> you should read the papers, i didnt make them do anything
[17:42] <mapps> ok
[17:43] <phunyguy> so, you didn't get banned for telling the "truth", you got banned for supporting/promoting violence.  Let's make sure that is clear.
[17:44] <tonyyarusso> Actually, I would have done it for the villification of an entire people even without the explicit violence.  That's pretty gross.
[17:45] <mapps> so it's ok they shoot down an innocent plane, gotcha
[17:45] <mapps> as usual, all about PC
[17:45] <phunyguy> mapps, for Christ's sake, get this through your head.  You got banned for promoting violence, and what tonyyarusso said.  Nothing more.
[17:46] <k1l_> mapps: its not ok you calling for "nuking turkey" or villification of all turkish people. no.
[17:46] <k1l_> mapps: no matter what the papers say: your behavior is not acceptable. stop blaming others for that
[17:47] <mapps> i dont agree, so i guess it's good im banned
[17:47] <phunyguy> and the leash was pretty short based on the past.
[17:47] <k1l_> yes, the ubuntu community doesnt want people that behave like you.
[17:47] <phunyguy> mapps, anything else we can help you with?
[17:48] <mapps> why is everyone appologists/lefties/ , saying anything negative and people cry
[17:48] <phunyguy> mapps, please /part the channel now.
[17:49] <phunyguy> This one should probably stick a bit longer than the last few.
[17:49] <phunyguy> (1-2 weeks before)
[17:50] <tonyyarusso> Yeah....I haven't even searched the BT to see how many separate ones he's had yet.
[17:50] <phunyguy> just search for the first two octets of his IP
[17:51] <phunyguy> wildcard it
[17:51] <phunyguy> in fact it would be ideal to change the ban to *!map*@195.166.*
[17:52] <phunyguy> he won't try to evade, but his IP changes in that range a lot
[17:52] <tonyyarusso> Right.
[17:52] <phunyguy> I think that syntax is correct anyway
[17:52] <phunyguy> first 3 digits of ident and first two octets of IP
[17:53] <tonyyarusso> Looks like maybe it can actually be slightly narrower too - seems his ISP only has a /21
[17:54] <tonyyarusso> Also, he always has at least two Ps in his nick, doesn't he?
[17:56] <phunyguy> not sure on that
[17:57] <phunyguy> figured one p to be safe
[17:57] <tonyyarusso> Oh, nope.
[17:57] <tonyyarusso> You're right.
[17:57] <phunyguy> it happens once in a while.  ;)
[17:57] <tonyyarusso> He also has more than one ISP, between DSL, phone, and I think a VPS or something.
[17:59] <phunyguy> hmm
[18:00] <tonyyarusso> One hasn't been used in a while, so really only two that I care about.
[18:02] <phunyguy> looks good
[18:34] <tonyyarusso> If you use the duration feature on @comment, does it count from the timestamp of the comment or of the ban?
[18:34] <k1l_> it forgets the duration
[18:35] <k1l_> i am trapped everytime in that misstake
[18:35] <tonyyarusso> er, what?
[18:35] <k1l_> yeah. seems like somewhat is broken on the bot on that.
[18:35] <phunyguy> yeah I just use @duration
[18:35] <tonyyarusso> What do you mean it forgets the duration?
[18:36] <k1l_> see comment on 69319
[18:36] <k1l_> @duration 69319
[18:36] <ubottu> [69319] ban - *!*@38.95.108.* - #ubuntu - never expires
[18:36] <k1l_> @comment 69319
[18:36] <ubottu> Sep 23 2015 21:24 k1l_: yoierlied!~yoierlied@38.95.108.251
[18:36] <ubottu> Sep 23 2015 21:25 k1l_: ban against the ip range of the pm harassment guy see 69318 69296 68569, 2M
[18:36] <tonyyarusso> Oh, so it just doesn't work at all.
[18:37] <k1l_> and i am quite sure i set some durations with @durations even after the comment and that got forgotten, too
[18:37] <tonyyarusso> All right, so in that case, if using *@duration* then, does it count from the date of the ban, or of when you use that command?  :P
[18:37] <k1l_> from date of ban
[18:37] <tonyyarusso> k
[19:09] <Flannel> Why is ubot9 in -ot?
[19:11] <tonyyarusso> There is *definitely* something wrong with the @duration code...
[19:14] <tonyyarusso> Take a ban from Aug 01 2015, do "@duration ID 5mo", it returns "will be removed after 5 months" (ie Jan 01 2016), do @duration ID again immediately, and it says "will be removed after 3 months and 2 days" (ie Feb 26 2016).  ???
[19:15] <Flannel> tonyyarusso: It's not a bug.  You're just not thinking fourth dimensionally.
[19:15] <tonyyarusso> heh
[19:16] <Flannel> tonyyarusso: Does it give you the Jan 1/Feb 26 date?
[19:16] <tonyyarusso> No, that's me calculating.
[21:39] <cristian_c> hello
[21:40] <k1l_> hello cristian_c
[21:40] <cristian_c> I'd have a question
[21:41] <cristian_c> k1l_: in #ubuntu-it we have found an user called 'ubot9'
=== bazhang_ is now known as bazhang
[21:41] <k1l_> that is Unit193s ubuntu bot.
[21:42] <cristian_c> ubot9 ukikie ubuntu/bot/ubot93 * :Killer robot from The Hive.
[21:42] <cristian_c> ubot9 :#ubuntu-it #ubuntu
[21:42] <cristian_c> k1l_: ah,k, thanks
[21:42] <ikonia> cristian_c: one of the other ops from #ubuntu-it was in yesterday
[21:42] <ikonia> I explained to him about the bot and all the info
[21:43] <cristian_c> ikonia: ah, ok, sorry, I didn't know
[21:43] <ikonia> no need for sorry
[21:43] <Unit193> cristian_c: Should be well behaved, but if you'd still like it gone no problem.
[21:43] <ikonia> maybe worth talking to the other ops so you're all in sync
[21:43] <cristian_c> ikonia: I think so
[21:44] <cristian_c> I'll talk with him to know his opinion
[21:44] <cristian_c> bye, thanks fpr the answer
[21:45] <valorie> ":Killer robot from The Hive." is probably not helpful
[21:51] <phunyguy> "The hive cluster is under attack"
[21:51] <Unit193> Different references there, both good.
[21:54] <Unit193> Either way though, that was leftover (and people actually read those!), changed to something sane now.
[21:58] <valorie> sane usually equals boring, I agree
[21:58] <valorie> science fiction classic refs are awesome
[21:59] <valorie> but not so much for newcomers and those for whom english is a second language
[23:19] <ubottu> bprompt called the ops in #ubuntu ()
[23:19] <ubottu> OerHeks called the ops in #ubuntu ()
[23:20] <k1l_> its some botnet again