[02:40] <Unit193> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/227646343/buildlog_ubuntu-xenial-i386.sqlitestudio_3.0.7-0vanir1~16.04_BUILDING.txt.gz  Ouch, nice failure there. :3
[02:47] <Unit193> (Temporary failure resolving 'ftpmaster.internal')
[02:51] <sarnold> Unit193: thanks, I've poked the IS staff
[02:55] <sarnold> Unit193: did you retry the build? any luck with that?
[03:06] <Unit193> sarnold: Of course, and yeah built fine.  Thanks, I was just commenting, I didn't think it was worth poking people about. :3
[03:07] <sarnold> Unit193: dunno, sometimes little things can indicate problems looming :)
[03:07] <sarnold> Unit193: thanks
[03:08] <Unit193> http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2015/11/23/%23ubuntu-devel.html#t22:44 Knew I'd seen it before.
[07:12] <pitti> Good morning
[07:13] <pitti> stgraber: yes, that's definitively planned, just a prio-3 work item; but Laney might beat me to it
[07:13] <pitti> stgraber: and yes, lxcfs regression :)
[08:04] <dholbach> good morning
[08:08] <seb128> lamont, hey, saw my comment/question on bug #1519518?
[11:39] <morphis> cking: ping
[11:40] <cking> morphis, yep
[11:40] <morphis> cking: I am currently fighting against a suspend problem on the MX 4 phone and awe suggested talking to you about this
[11:40] <morphis> its https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1505241
[11:42] <cking> ok, MT662x waking it up I see
[11:42] <morphis> yes
[11:42] <morphis> basically I am searching for good ways to track this one done
[11:42] <morphis> s/done/down/
[11:42] <morphis> as it seems to take quite a long time to occur
[11:43] <morphis> cking: should I give you a bit more background on what is going on and when this one first occured?
[11:44] <cking> morphis, I'm currently trying to debug an ext4 encryption bug, and my manager did inform pat mcgowan that we need to book in my time to look at these kind of phone bugs
[11:45] <morphis> ok
[11:46] <cking> sorry about that, I'm currently way overbooked on time
[11:46] <morphis> np
[11:46] <morphis> ogasawara is your manager, right?
[11:46] <cking> get pat to raise it with leann if it's a priority, yep
[11:47] <morphis> good
[11:47] <morphis> cking: basically I just wanted some tips how to tackle this one the best way rather than active help
[11:48] <cking> sure, ok, well, I'd suggest actually adding debug into the kernel to see what's causing the lock
[11:48] <cking> e.g. where it's coming from, when and why, gathering lots of debug info so one can see if one can spot a trend
[11:49] <cking> but that's all I can suggest w/o deeper diving, which takes time
[11:50] <morphis> ok, thanks for that!
[11:50] <morphis> that was a thing I am already doing, so let me continue with that
[11:50] <cking> unfortunately it is a "gather loads of data and try to spot what's going wrong over time" kinda bug
[11:51] <cking> :-(
[11:55] <morphis> yes..
[11:55] <morphis> but lets see what I find
[14:50] <lamont> seb128: I didn't.  looking
[14:53] <lamont> seb128: I only changed what it complained about as I iterated through it.  Ultimately, I tried smashing it back to python2, and the package I was actually working on didn't seem to fix the problem in the 3rd thing that I was actually trying to solve.
[14:54] <seb128> lamont, I tried, it complained about the exceptions but the str() didn't seem needed/it wasn't complaining about it
[14:54] <seb128> do you remember what error you had?
[14:54] <lamont> seb128: not at all
[14:54] <seb128> k, thanks
[14:55] <seb128> I might just not include it and wait for the next report :p
[14:55] <lamont> trying to build ibus_1.5.11 (I think there's a copy in my ppa)
[14:55] <lamont> wfm :D
[14:55] <seb128> why do you need the new ibus?
[14:55]  * lamont also didn't check the package for other py3 issues
[14:56] <seb128> IntelliJ?
[14:56] <lamont> pycharm hates the old ibus which hates gconf
[14:57] <seb128> how hate?
[14:57] <seb128> is that on 15.10?
[14:57] <lamont> xenial
[14:57] <lamont> because of crazy
[14:57] <seb128> oh, we still don't have .11
[14:57] <seb128> what is happyaron doing? ;-)
[14:57] <seb128> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ibus/+bug/1512956 btw
[14:57] <lamont> well, I think I did the merge into my ppa :D
[14:57] <seb128> happyaron, ^ could you have a look to that?
[14:58] <lamont> otoh, it was pretty much a "smash it with a hammer until it fits" merge, without much attention to accuracy
[15:00] <lamont> tjaalton: if today's turkey doesn't put me into a vegetative state, I'll be working on bind9.10
[15:01] <lamont> -backports defaults to pinned low?  kewl
[15:07] <lamont> seb 1518118 would be related to 1512956
[15:08] <lamont> as in near-duplicate
[15:14] <seb128> lamont, right, it was closed as duplicate
[15:14] <seb128> seems happyaron is on it, he did the update in Debian
[15:14] <seb128> so I guess it's a matter of merging/landing to Ubuntu now
[15:14] <lamont> kewl
[15:15] <lamont> yeah, which my ppa package might actually have done
[15:15] <lamont> it's ftbfs in the ppa, because of gconf2
[15:15] <lamont> feel free to grab that for your gconf2 testing fun
[15:21] <seb128> k
[15:21] <seb128> I'm not even sure why ibus is still doing schemas conversion
[15:22] <seb128> gconf is deprecated for years, it should ship a gsettings schemas and that's it
[15:26] <tjaalton> lamont: wow, great to hear :)
[15:40] <ogra_> [FAILED] Failed to start Create Volatile Files and Directories.
[15:40] <ogra_> pitti, could we make that respect an existing mtab link on readonly filesystems ? ^^^
[15:42] <pitti> ogra_: oh, it's failing to create /etc/mtab?
[15:42] <ogra_> yeah
[15:42] <pitti> ogra_: right, I think this should be quiesced; mind filing a but about it?
[15:42] <ogra_> we create the link at image build time because the rootfs is readonly
[15:42] <pitti> bug too :)
[15:42] <ogra_> will do
[16:23] <juliank> bdmurray_: I'll apply the patch for #1503979 as is upstream (+ gitified commit message), as I'm about to do a 1.1~beta1 release to match the APT 1.1 upload to unstable
[16:23] <juliank> + the changes I mentioned
[17:49] <cjwatson> jamespage: Would it be possible for somebody to have a look at https://code.launchpad.net/~cjwatson/charms/trusty/ubuntu-repository-cache/xz-indexes/+merge/277880 ?  The CI failures don't make any sense to me (testbed problems?), and it'll need a charmer to review and merge
[21:56] <mwhudson> i really must stop running apt-get source with sudo