[08:15] <fgimenez> good morning
[08:40] <dholbach> good morning
[10:05] <JamesTait> Good morning all; happy Friday, and happy Systems Engineer Day! 😃
[13:10] <ogra_> 402614
[13:10] <tbr> 42!
[13:13] <ogra_> yay, yubikey !
[15:32] <ogra_> hmm, do we have a way to define a mode for the target file in the snapcraft copy plugin ?
[15:44] <longsleep> ogra_: not that i am aware of, would be nice to have though
[15:44] <ogra_> yeah
[15:45] <longsleep> especially for binary and service files some consistency check would be good as well, makes no sense for them to be non executable
[16:21] <elopio_> fgimenez: what would be a good name for the reboot flag?
[16:21] <elopio_> !cannotrebot ?
[16:21] <elopio_> we have the double negative again.
[16:24] <elopio> fgimenez: maybe, !withoutreboots
[16:25] <fgimenez> elopio, AFAIUI if we want them to be executed by default they have to be defined with the double negative, yes
[16:25] <fgimenez> elopio, sounds good, or continue with exclude...
[16:26] <elopio> fgimenez: yes, that's the problem with tags. But using "low" was a nice trick.
[16:26] <elopio> !excludereboot, that's not so bad.
[16:27] <fgimenez> elopio, at least the command line reads fine: -test-build-tags=[without|exclude]reboots
[19:43] <mterry_> ogra_, hah, love the nethack snap, haven't tried it yet, but saw it go by  :)
[19:43] <ogra_> :D