slangasek | @pilot out | 03:30 |
---|---|---|
=== udevbot changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Wily (15.10) Released! | Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support or app devel) | build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of precise-wily | #ubuntu-app-devel for app development on Ubuntu http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment | See #ubuntu-bugs for http://bit.ly/lv8soi | Patch Pilots: | ||
=== Trevinho_ is now known as Trevinho | ||
=== mnepton is now known as mneptok | ||
=== beisner- is now known as beisner | ||
=== Logan_ is now known as Logan | ||
=== inaddy is now known as tinoco | ||
=== nelhage_ is now known as nelhage | ||
=== Tribaal_ is now known as Tribaal | ||
Purvik | Hello | 06:46 |
Purvik | I am Purvik | 06:46 |
Purvik | From India | 06:46 |
Purvik | I want to work on opensourse development | 06:46 |
Purvik | but i am new because currntly i am in third sem of BE Computer Engg. so i didn't study os now but i self study something. | 06:48 |
Purvik | so please guide me | 06:48 |
Purvik | i want to join os development | 06:48 |
Purvik | my email id is | 06:48 |
Purvik | mahetapurvik1210@gmail.com | 06:48 |
sladen | Purvik: are there any programs you've used, and spotted a bug that is frustrating/annoying. Perhaps that would be the place to start | 06:52 |
sladen | Purvik: Ubuntu is made of lots of individual pieces, so picking and playing/experimenting with one small area is likely to be easier to get a handle on | 06:53 |
sladen | Purvik: if you find a bug on a small program (start small), you can then apt-get source programnamexyz and trying poking/recompiling | 06:54 |
Purvik | can you please suggest me that how to start | 06:57 |
Purvik | means any programme | 06:57 |
Purvik | because i am not that much familier with linux | 06:58 |
Purvik | so suggest me any program that how can i start for linux development programme | 06:59 |
=== sunweave1 is now known as sunweaver | ||
juliank | It seems that merging APT 1.1 will cause PPA building from recipes to fail: https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/1520827 | 20:46 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1520827 in Launchpad itself "PPAs or recipes incompatible with APT 1.1: Passes -y to a command not supporting it" [Undecided,New] | 20:46 |
cjwatson | juliank: buildrecipe uses "apt-get install -y lsb-release" and "apt-get build-dep -y --only-source <package>". Do you know which it is? | 20:52 |
cjwatson | juliank: And that seems like a reasonably alarming incompatibility - I think both those forms are quite commonplace? | 20:53 |
juliank | cjwatson: Both work for me, so it must be something else | 20:53 |
cjwatson | juliank: From the log, I think it must be the first of those | 20:54 |
juliank | Well, install -y must work. It's used by the test suite. | 20:54 |
cjwatson | It'll be passed through sudo, but surely that hasn't changed | 20:55 |
cjwatson | The full command line will be /usr/bin/sudo /usr/sbin/chroot <path to chroot> apt-get install -y lsb-release | 20:56 |
juliank | cjwatson: And in fact, a previous build worked like that one: https://launchpad.net/~deity/+archive/ubuntu/sid/+build/8350920 | 20:57 |
juliank | or rather that one: https://launchpad.net/~deity/+archive/ubuntu/sid/+recipebuild/1028125 | 20:57 |
juliank | cjwatson: Maybe I should try reissuing the build? | 20:58 |
juliank | Maybe some bits flipped in memory | 20:58 |
cjwatson | I suppose you can try, but it seems like a rather startling coincidence | 20:58 |
juliank | Well, there were not many changes in APT between the two builds | 20:59 |
cjwatson | The difference is from apt 1.1+2790~ubuntu15.10.1 to 1.1.1+2803~ubuntu16.04.1 | 20:59 |
cjwatson | Anyway, by all means retry, it's cheap | 20:59 |
* cjwatson logs this in the bug | 21:00 | |
juliank | cjwatson: One of those revisions added some weak symbol trickery for commandline parsing, maybe it causes a failure on Ubuntu because of -O3 vs -O2 on Debian. | 21:04 |
juliank | https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~deity/apt/debian-sid/revision/2792 | 21:04 |
juliank | Previously the symbols were undefined and just defined in the main program | 21:05 |
cjwatson | juliank: Where would -O3 come in? | 21:05 |
juliank | cjwatson: Isn't that the default? | 21:05 |
cjwatson | juliank: Only for ppc64el | 21:05 |
cjwatson | For reasons | 21:05 |
juliank | Ah | 21:05 |
juliank | Hmm | 21:06 |
cjwatson | Try in a xenial chroot with the apt that that recipe build is installing, I guess? | 21:06 |
juliank | Yes | 21:06 |
juliank | I'm glad I set up that PPA | 21:07 |
cjwatson | Indeed! | 21:08 |
cjwatson | Nice bit of QA | 21:09 |
juliank | cjwatson: Yes, it's the install thing | 21:10 |
juliank | cjwatson: I can verify that command-line parsing is completely broken now | 21:12 |
juliank | Now trying to build | 21:13 |
juliank | cjwatson: Hmm, I see that LDFLAGS contains -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions could that cause libapt-private to bind the uses of those weak symbols to the internal weak definitions instead of the strong ones? | 21:23 |
juliank | Oh no, mvo was working on exactly the same issue, but is not online anywhere | 21:33 |
=== juliank0 is now known as juliank | ||
goddard1 | anyone know why a USB device config descriptor would have an array of 38 hex items? | 23:18 |
goddard1 | most documentation I read only has 8 items | 23:18 |
=== goddard1 is now known as goddard | ||
goddard | ? | 23:34 |
juliank | goddard: Hey, it might take some time. Especially on a weekend... | 23:43 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!