=== Lcawte is now known as Lcawte|Away === jamietech is now known as jamietech- [02:27] stokachu: ping? [02:28] stokachu: hey. with the openstack-installer, where does the juju bootstrap server end up? i can't find it anywhere :) [02:56] pmatulis: single is in a container === Monthrect is now known as Piper-Off [03:03] stokachu: i looked at the containers that got built on the node that the installer grabbed. i don't see a ~/.juju anywhere [03:07] i want to be able to do 'juju ssh landscape-server/0' === Guest16550 is now known as Govindam === Govindam is now known as Guest74127 === Guest74127 is now known as Govindam- === hxm is now known as Guest83783 === ksx4system_ is now known as ksx4system === Punna is now known as Pwnna === xar is now known as xar- === beisner- is now known as beisner === inaddy is now known as tinoco === mnaser_ is now known as mnaser === edwardly_ is now known as edwardly === xMopxShe- is now known as xMopxShell === bigjools_ is now known as bigjools === jrgifford_ is now known as jrgifford === Tribaal_ is now known as Tribaal === chmurifr- is now known as chmurifree === MACscr1 is now known as MACscr [09:37] any way that i can mount a new drive to something like /. say / is currently a 8GB volume and I want to mount a 500GB volume on / without losing any data or having to reboot [09:37] You cant. [09:39] Good morning. [09:39] eatingthenight: Do you use LVM? [09:40] lordievader: let me check... just started at a new job and am really not liking how the ops guys have these servers setup [09:40] 11"not really liking" :D [09:41] That is inevitable :P [09:41] Thats not a valuable argument for changing things in a production environment :) [09:41] On a server, 8GB / is most likely more than enough :) [09:42] Agreed. [09:43] i'm not going to argue with them it's just not how i have set them up in the past [09:43] Yes. And maybe your way of setting up servers doesnt match the requirements of your new job. [09:44] Anyhow, to more or less answer your question. If you do not use lvm your idea is (likely) not going to work. [09:44] That is what I meant with "not really liking" is not a justification for anything else but a personal opinion. [09:46] ok so instead of trying to do the above i'll give an example. I am using docker and when pulling down containers i'll eat up the 8GB provided for / fast. Would you instead partition another drive and make a storage volume and configure docker in the instance to use that storage volume? [09:47] I'll just compare it to our lxc setup. Each lxc container has its own logical volume. [09:48] eatingthenight: I'm not using partitions for a decade now, I am using LVM. [09:49] And I am using setups not requiring insanely large / volumes. [09:53] is it common to setup the root mount as 'none on / type tmpfs' [09:54] Depends on the setup. [09:56] hmm guess i'm really not sure how mounting with a virtual filesystem all works [09:56] i'll have to read up [09:56] eatingthenight: look up overlayfs and have a look here - http://askubuntu.com/questions/109413/how-do-i-use-overlayfs [09:56] eatingthenight: Maybe you should investigate the entire setup of your production servers before changing it. [09:57] bekks: i mean i am i haven't changed everything yet. but we have virtual 0 docs on the setup [09:57] Investigate why things are set up the way they are. [09:57] bekks: also, what bekks said. (i've personally never had more than 4GB for /) [09:57] i read all the provided ones already [12:34] eatingthenight: Well, then you have to investigate how things are setup. [12:35] eatingthenight: Forget the docs of your admin, grab a ssh shell and start investigating things. [15:31] Afternoon all! Postfix question here- Looking for a way to log all email addresses that have received an email. At the moment I've got a small postfix server with forwarding set up (no mailboxes). Got a wildcard set up to forward all mail to one address for a domain and it'd be really cool if I could log those email addresses that receive an email to a file... if that's possible. Anyone got any id [15:31] eas? [15:43] hey guys. I have a /64 block of IPv6s and want to bind all of them to my ubuntu server. I only found instructions on how to add specific IPs but not how to add the whole range. Since these are billions of IPs, is there a way to add the whole range instead of individual IPs? Could someone point me in the right direction? === popo_ is now known as popo === ossurayynot is now known as tonyyarusso [17:14] https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+question/259165 anybody know how to deal with that? [17:14] (aside from the obvious: build the module myself and adjust the config manually) [17:22] wow it looks like there's nothing ubuntu for building apache modules [17:22] just a branded apache-dev with nuthin to go with it === Piper-Off is now known as Monthrect [17:32] JuanDaugherty: I was curious, so I looked around. Looks like imagemap was demoted from the 'most' set to the 'never build unless explicitly requested' set during 2.3 development [17:32] does ubuntu have anything specific to it for building apache modules? [17:33] (ie. specific to ubuntu) [17:34] Seems unlikely, the Ubuntu packages aren't modified much compared to Debian [17:34] what one expects is that apache2-dev would be coordinated with the apache usage in the distro [17:34] acknowledged [17:35] I don't understand what you mean about 'coordinated'. There is an apache2-dev package and it contains apxs, so..... what? [17:40] ok, it's been a few years since I build apache modules [17:41] coordinated basically means documentation and fitting the thing within ubuntus offerings [17:41] *ubuntu's [17:42] *built [17:44] JuanDaugherty: the apache2-dev package contains the dev headers and apxs2 binary. Also has the debhelper stuff. What else are you expecting to be there? [17:45] well I'm familiar with the apache build env [17:46] if the concept of ubuntu coordination with the pkgs it redistributes is too much, peccavi [17:46] and nvm [17:47] JuanDaugherty: The problem isn't necessarily the concept, it's how you're communicating it. [17:47] ah, good [17:47] JuanDaugherty: But hey, if you want to be snarky instead of explain, that's your right, of course. [17:48] well conceptual clarity is paramount [17:48] clarity/cogency [17:49] I really have no idea what you are wanting right now, you seem to have veered off into a deeply abstract discussion [17:50] no worries [17:50] ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ [17:52] but here's another way of putting it [17:53] should I on the base of my knowledge of apache internals and by virtue of having installed the appropriate pkgs in synaptic [17:53] be able to get the source for the module, move it into a file structure of the pkg(s) or find that it was included with one [17:54] and then build and move the move the module to the working config on the same machine in a straightforward way? [17:55] s/move the// [17:55] alternatively [17:55] If you happened to be an expert in the use of apxs, you could probably manage it [17:55] Otherwise, probably not [17:56] is there any documentation for the use of the apache2-dev module or for building apache modules which ubuntu isn't distributing? [17:57] so as I say clarity and cogency of concepts is paramount [17:57] the other is that emotional intelligence bullshit [17:58] You've gone back to abstract-meaningless land [17:58] as part of my survey may I ask if you are a native speaker of English? [17:58] As for documentation, you're working with an area of complexity where you'd want to look at Apache httpd upstream documentation rather than Ubuntu/Debian stuff, I think [17:59] I am a native speaker of English [17:59] or if you are in the right end of the political spectrum in whatever country you're from? [18:00] I am the kind who mostly ignores politics entirely [18:00] you vote tory? [18:01] or not at all? [18:01] * JuanDaugherty checks UK turnout rates. [18:01] about same as here (US) [18:02] so that's the crisis of democracy [18:03] 65% turnout with the winner seldom getting more than 50% of that [18:03] which would be OK if people were satisified and that's why they didn't bother to vote [19:26] is it just me or do none of the current NFS server/client tutorials for Ubuntu have detailed iptables info? Most of the tutorials that i have found that include that info are for rhel/centos and obviously some of the settings paths are different where some of those ports are set === Lcawte|Away is now known as Lcawte [20:38] ha looks like the same thing can be done with cgi [22:10] and forgot about client side === hxm is now known as Guest48935 === Malediction_ is now known as Malediction === Monthrect is now known as Piper-Off