[01:27] <Logan> cyphermox: hah, now I want one
[01:28] <Logan> so are we building every package on s390x now?
[01:28] <Logan> well, every "any" package
[01:30] <xnox> Logan, at the moment nothing is built, as none exist =) but in the future yes. Think of this like ppc64el, arm64 ports, which were brought up in recent times. but really not the good time or place to talk about it, as the shoe strings are being put together to get things going.
[01:41] <cjwatson> Logan: unless specifically excluded in their Architecture, indeed
[01:41] <cjwatson> Logan: though as usual, packages that never built won't count against proposed migration
[01:42] <Logan> nice, sounds awesome
[01:42] <cjwatson> infinity: might want to teach p-m about s390x
[01:42] <Logan> looking forward to another cycle of blind porting :P
[01:43] <slangasek> gonna be pretty boring; this is a mature architecture in Debian
[01:43] <infinity> Logan: This one won't need much love like the last two, it's an old port.
[01:43] <Logan> hmm, okay
[01:45] <cjwatson> no endless autoreconfery for us this time
[01:46] <cjwatson> also it'll have 28 builders once we get things going, at least for the short term, so shouldn't get in people's way nearly as much :)
[10:48] <apw> cjwatson, britney is (now) reporting xenial linux-meta and linux as lacking builds on s390x and not starting testing, do i presume that they are stuck there until those builds appear ?  s390x is not a lagging arch?
[10:49] <apw> cjwatson, and actually, launchpad is not reporting builds as existing for s390x in the web interface, is that correct
[11:14] <cjwatson> apw: Yeah, I was trying to get somebody to do the britney work last night since I can't
[11:14] <cjwatson> apw: Launchpad> example URL please?
[11:14] <cjwatson> 'cos it sure is in some places
[11:25] <cjwatson> apw: Oh, the kernel, that'll be because your Architecture lines don't include s390x, so that's expected.  Don't worry about the "missing build on s390x" in your case - that's actually just because arch all binaries are out of date, so it'll clear as soon as we process amd64 through NEW
[11:25] <apw> cjwatson, well our architecture lines do contain s390x for the one in -proposed, but https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/4.3.0-1.10 does not have a missing build for it
[11:25] <cjwatson> apw: Oh, infinity didn't run add-missing-builds for -proposed, we were going to wait until release was a bit more fleshed out
[11:26] <cjwatson> infinity: Maybe I was wrong and that isn't worth the confusion
[11:27] <infinity> cjwatson: Nah, I think you were right. :P
[11:27] <infinity> cjwatson: I was going to do proposed once main's more or less done.
[11:27] <apw> cjwatson, ahh then that makes sense then
[11:27] <cjwatson> Copies into release will still generate builds, so we won't end up in a half state
[11:28] <infinity> Even if something did get stuck in a half state, I was going to re-run add-missing for all pockets at the end anyway, out of paranoia.
[12:52] <rbasak> Can an AA please review monitoring-plugins languishing in Xenial NEW? It's a merge of a Debian source package rename.
[15:02]  * apw notes that britney is reporting wily as in freeze, is that just leftovers from the release ?
[15:02]  * apw also notes that the title says wily release coordination still
[15:10] <cjwatson> apw: what URL is that?
[15:10] <apw> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/wily/update_excuses.html
[15:10] <apw> cjwatson, ^ that one
[15:11] <cjwatson> apw: note the URL ...
[15:11] <cjwatson> s,wily/,,
[15:11] <cjwatson> or s/wily/xenial/
[15:12] <cjwatson> oh, wait, you actually are intentionally looking at the stable run
[15:12] <apw> cjwatson, right, looking at the stable runs for adt info etc, presumably not making a differnce, just odd
[15:13] <cjwatson> apw: sorry, I understand now, I have hit it with a suitable hammer so it should clear in a bit
[15:14] <apw> cjwatson, ack thanks
[15:14] <cjwatson> (removed the old hints branch - it'll rebranch on the next run)
[15:18] <apw> could someone review the linux-signed in new, so we can see if testing kicks off ok with s390x in the mix
[15:18] <apw> (in xenial-proposed)
[15:18] <cjwatson> looks like it was just accepted
[15:18] <cjwatson> oh that
[15:20] <apw> ta
[18:46] <bdmurray> slangasek: Could you review my python-apt SRUs for T and W?
[18:47] <slangasek> bdmurray: sure, looking
[19:14] <bdmurray> slangasek: There's a wily one too.
[19:14] <slangasek> bdmurray: yep, got interrupted - doing it now :)
[19:17] <bdmurray> slangasek: okay
[19:18] <slangasek> done
[20:45] <cjwatson> right, we have a slightly more respectable number of s390x builders now, though still only about a third of the end total
[21:13] <tkamppeter> Hi, why is cups-filters 1.2.0-1 stuck in xenial-proposed for 2 days now? It has successfully built on all plat forms.
[21:31] <xnox> it built \o/ slangasek ^ can you please de-new it =)
[21:33] <slangasek> xnox: someone may have beat me to it?
[21:33] <xnox> newing libc6-s390 looks good, not sure about the .ddebs... i thought they don't go into launchpad.
[21:34] <xnox> slangasek, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial/+queue?queue_state=0&queue_text=glibc
[21:34] <xnox> it's in release pocket.
[21:34] <slangasek> ah yes
[21:34] <xnox> because funny arches =)
[21:34]  * xnox goes back to evening tea and waiting for firefox to build
[21:35] <xnox> slangasek, is it normal for -*dbgsym*.ddebs to be listed as NEW packages ? (me has no idea, cause well, i'm not an AA)
[21:36] <slangasek> xnox: yes, it apparently is normal :)
[21:36] <slangasek> accepted now
[22:00] <tkamppeter> slangasek, xnox, why is cups-filters 1.2.0-1 stuck in xenial-proposed for 2 days now? It has successfully built on all plat forms.
[22:03] <xnox> tkamppeter, it's in poppler transition, which is not complete. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ProposedMigration
[22:33] <tkamppeter> xnox, thanks.
[22:59] <cjwatson> xnox: ddebs go into Launchpad as of April
[22:59] <cjwatson> http://blog.launchpad.net/general/launchpad-news-april-june-2015
[23:01] <xnox> cjwatson, i read that.... well just the "git" portion =))))) and then was over-exited and went to play with all of that.
[23:40] <xnox> libdbusmenu is hung, as usual, killing the build.
[23:40] <xnox> known bug #1429291