| === michihenning is now known as michi | ||
| === michi is now known as Guest23427 | ||
| Laney | hmm | 11:18 |
|---|---|---|
| Laney | Is it expected that things being built against the s390x bootstrap archive are getting held in proposed? | 11:18 |
| Laney | For example texlive-binaries got a dependency on libpoppler56 which it got from the bootstrap archive, and now britney is (correctly) saying it is uninstallable | 11:19 |
| Laney | ...It would actually want a rebuild for the poppler transition on s390x, but poppler isn't built yet | 11:21 |
| cjwatson | Mirv: Looks like qtbase-opensource-src build-depends on publicsuffix, which is in universe. Could you sort out an MIR? | 11:58 |
| cjwatson | That's needed for Laney's request, via a couple of layers | 11:58 |
| Laney | I just asked him in #ubuntu-desktop | 11:58 |
| Laney | but thanks | 11:58 |
| Laney | Think it should be a trivial MIR | 11:58 |
| Mirv | cjwatson: darn, yes, I'll file a MIR | 11:59 |
| infinity | I could toss a bootstrap build of qtbase-opensource-src from the release pocket into a bootstrap repo. Maybe. | 11:59 |
| Laney | You could pre-promote publicsuffix based on its triviality ;) | 11:59 |
| xnox | Mirv, cause without that, i can't build qtbase-opensource-src in proposed on s390x, and then i can't build new poppler, and the world is sad, and -proposed will pile up =) | 12:00 |
| infinity | Laney: Looking now. | 12:00 |
| Laney | Ta | 12:00 |
| infinity | Yeah. | 12:01 |
| infinity | I'm not on the team anymore, but happy to pre-promote. | 12:01 |
| infinity | It's a single data file. :P | 12:01 |
| cjwatson | And sigh, if I'd realised ghc and haskell-* were going to be uploaded overnight I'd have sync-blacklisted them. | 12:01 |
| cjwatson | Now I get to rebuild everything. | 12:01 |
| xnox | infinity, NB! _and_ a symlink =) | 12:01 |
| Laney | Hopefully qtbase builds | 12:03 |
| infinity | It had a single test failure in the previous version. | 12:03 |
| infinity | Maybe this one's happier. | 12:03 |
| infinity | Fingers crossed. | 12:03 |
| xnox | yeah, there were weird QtFile test suite failures, with long 240+ characters file names, on a debian kernel... | 12:04 |
| xnox | and different toolchain... | 12:04 |
| xnox | and i see more qtbase being built in landing-032 again ?! | 12:05 |
| Laney | Silos might need s390x turned on, if that's an explicit knob | 12:07 |
| xnox | wgrant, ^ | 12:08 |
| xnox | Laney, i think it is a knob | 12:08 |
| Mirv | Laney: xnox: cjwatson: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/publicsuffix/+bug/1522811 | 12:09 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1522811 in publicsuffix (Ubuntu) "[MIR] publicsuffix" [Undecided,New] | 12:10 |
| * Laney adds s390x to transition-tracker | 12:10 | |
| Laney | Mirv: ta | 12:10 |
| cjwatson | Laney: It is, but we want to let the bootstrap finish first | 12:14 |
| cjwatson | There's always going to be a slightly ambiguous period | 12:14 |
| cjwatson | But let's not confuse people with a bazillion dep-waits | 12:15 |
| Laney | As you wish | 12:18 |
| infinity | I was probably going to turn on s390x in silos early next week. | 12:22 |
| infinity | Once we've made sure most of our stack kinda builds. | 12:22 |
| xnox | building qtbase-opensource-src in a nonvirt ppa, with universe enabled, s390x build to see if it will build. (thus not waiting publicsuffix mir) | 12:29 |
| infinity | xnox: it's already building in the primary archive. | 12:55 |
| Laney | Totals: 55 passed, 1 failed, 0 skipped, 0 blacklisted | 12:57 |
| Laney | ********* Finished testing of tst_LargeFile ********* | 12:57 |
| Laney | Makefile:573: recipe for target 'check' failed | 12:57 |
| xnox | as usual. | 13:01 |
| xnox | oh but qfile did pass. | 13:01 |
| infinity | #if defined(__x86_64__) | 13:02 |
| infinity | QEXPECT_FAIL("", "fails on 64-bit Linux (QTBUG-21175)", Abort); | 13:02 |
| infinity | #endif | 13:02 |
| infinity | WORST IFDEF EVER. | 13:02 |
| infinity | Fails on 64-bit Linux, so we'll exclude only one 64-bit arch. | 13:02 |
| infinity | And before anyone asks "but, how does it work on arm64 and ppc64el then?" | 13:04 |
| infinity | # Skip tests on the archs they are known to be flaky with current configuration | 13:04 |
| infinity | testskip_architectures := arm64 powerpc ppc64el | 13:04 |
| infinity | Brilliant in so many ways. | 13:04 |
| infinity | Anyhow, someone fix either the ifdef in the test (preferred) or the excluded test arches (ick), and you're golden. | 13:05 |
| infinity | Mirv, xnox: ^ | 13:05 |
| xnox | infinity, i have chroot up with qtbase, i was working on excluding individual tests, and marking htem expect fail | 13:05 |
| xnox | infinity, cause most tests do pass. | 13:05 |
| infinity | xnox: There's only one failing test. | 13:06 |
| infinity | xnox: And there's already an ifdef there to exclude it on amd64. That's what I was pointing out. :P | 13:06 |
| xnox | infinity, thanks. i was fixing broken schroot on debian, that doesn't support too-new kernel with too new overlayfs expected options =) | 13:06 |
| infinity | xnox: Use aufs? | 13:07 |
| xnox | infinity, and there might be more tests after it, as the build is done without -k | 13:07 |
| xnox | infinity, phhhh, i'm hipster. | 13:07 |
| Mirv | infinity: xnox: my next upload will make the archs to run tests on opt-in instead of opt-out, so xnox can then later eg add s390x when it passes | 13:09 |
| xnox | Mirv, please no, i want to run tests on s390x. | 13:09 |
| xnox | or keep it enabled, i'll upload direct to archive, rather than silo to get it building and migrating. | 13:10 |
| xnox | most of them pass on s390x, it's not a new platform, but a solid one. | 13:10 |
| cjwatson | Well, opt-in is still good, you can just add s390x to the list. | 13:10 |
| Mirv | xnox: well it's better to specify which architectures to run on, but I'll gladly add s390x there if you have the changes by that time | 13:10 |
| xnox | Mirv, yeap. | 13:10 |
| infinity | Mirv: The line I pointed out above is obviously wrong anyway. | 13:12 |
| infinity | Mirv: When the comment says "doesn't work on 64-bit" and then it only excludes on 64-bit arch. :P | 13:13 |
| infinity | Mirv: Especially since Qt pretty much has to have some is_64bit macro or something that's used in, like, the entire codebase... | 13:13 |
| infinity | s/excludes on/excludes one/ | 13:13 |
| Mirv | infinity: sure it's wrong. upstream CI is x86+armhf only so they probably do things like that in tests at times unfortunately | 13:19 |
| cjwatson | right, I'm going to cancel all the haskell builds that are still "needs building", partly to get queues under control a bit more and partly because they're mostly going to need rebuilds anyway | 13:33 |
| xnox | proposed-migrations says that zipl-installer is not installable, yet i don't see how or why =( | 15:02 |
| cjwatson | xnox: with all the virtual dependencies in use in the installer, it's probably fallout from something earlier on, maybe partman-base not being installable | 15:14 |
| cjwatson | xnox: a lot of things should get less ridiculously difficult to unpick once a new kernel lands | 15:16 |
| xnox | ack. | 15:17 |
| xnox | well i added -proposed and -release, debian-installer bits and e.g. zipl-installer is installable, so it's okish. i guess it just doesn't migrate on it's own then. | 15:17 |
| cjwatson | xnox: It transitively depends on kernel udebs, so until they're migratable, migrating zipl-installer would increase the installability count by one | 15:19 |
| cjwatson | Even though it's basically for an existing reason | 15:20 |
| apw | cjwatson, fyi i just released the 4.3 kernel | 16:21 |
| cjwatson | apw: oh good, thanks | 16:24 |
| xnox | where is autopackage test page? | 16:50 |
| xnox | ... | 16:50 |
| xnox | why did i cause new binaries for procps.... /me looks | 16:50 |
| xnox | abi bump, sigh. | 16:51 |
| xnox | E: Invalid Release signature (key id 40976EAF437D05B5) -> i hate the world | 17:47 |
| xnox | tst_QImage 1 failed, tst_QtJson 1 failed, tst_QLogging 11 failed, | 20:07 |
| xnox | =( | 20:07 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!