=== salem_ is now known as _salem [10:42] hello trainguards, would you please assign a silo for the UITK landing https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/754 ? [11:09] bzoltan_: sir yes sir [11:10] Mirv: thank you sir :) [11:32] Mirv: I do not get it... why the silo tries to build first the -gles package? https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-031-1-build/6/console [11:33] bzoltan_: not sure if robru has changed something regarding the gles logic [11:34] Mirv: it feels like.. I liked better when i could build the main without the gles [11:34] Mirv: for the main it says "Created tag 1.3.1740+16.04.20151205.1-0ubuntu1." [11:34] bzoltan_: it's not first though I think, there's normal UITK first isn't there? but it fails [11:34] bzoltan_: .1 for main package, .2 for gles [11:35] Mirv: should the gles +1 the main? [11:35] I use now 1.3.1740+16.04.20151205.1-0ubuntu1 [11:35] bzoltan_: no, I mean it says in the log some reason tarball for package ubuntu-ui-toolkit-gles, version 1.3.1740+16.04.20151205.2. [11:36] Mirv: and that is BS -> https://code.launchpad.net/~bzoltan/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/OTA9_landing_2015-12-05-gles/+merge/279676 [11:36] bzoltan_: maybe it bumps it and you should have it without ".1" or sth... simple guessing, no idea [11:36] Mirv: I will keep trying few times... [11:36] debian/rules:23: recipe for target 'get-packaged-orig-source' failed [11:37] find ~/silos/ubuntu/landing-031 -name ubuntu-ui-toolkit_1.3.1740+16.04.20151205.2.orig.tar.gz -exec \ [11:37] bzoltan_: the thing is, isn't the new logic completely in debian/rules http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~bzoltan/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/OTA9_landing_2015-12-05-gles/view/head:/debian/rules [11:38] so I'm not sure why it would do that, unless train bumps the version number indeed before the rules is run. in that case, the lowering (removing ".1") could help [11:40] suod sync [11:40] hah [11:41] (sorry EFOCUS) [11:41] Mirv: let me hack that rules file :) [11:41] hello ogra_, long time no sea :D [11:41] hey hey [11:41] ogra_: how is life on snappy side? [11:51] ogra_: I thought sync wouldn't need sudo for anything [11:52] but that's just assumption based on that it has seemed to work [11:52] it used to at some point ... old habits die hard :) [11:53] bzoltan_, it is snappy indeed :) [11:53] (and very busy) [11:54] ogra_: happy busy or pressure busy ... but why do I ask when I know [11:54] heh, both :) [12:03] bzoltan_: fsck, it still takes it from the changelog [12:03] Mirv: it seems so [12:04] Mirv: where does it get the 1.3.1740+16.04.20151205.2 from? [12:04] bzoltan_: you can add more hacks always [12:04] bzoltan_: probably train bumps the changelog [12:04] Mirv: give me hint [12:04] Mirv: I remove the .1 [12:04] bzoltan_: sed -i "1 s/20151205.2/20151205.1/" debian/changelog [12:05] Mirv: wow... editing the changelog from thje rules??? Duuuuude, that is a a new level [12:58] bzoltan_: out of ideas... :( [13:02] Mirv: strange problem [14:26] bzoltan_: well one idea was that you change the MP:s changelog entry version to be without the ".1" in case the train is +1:ing it. then the normal date code would become .1. [14:27] but it might be also something completely elese [15:25] Mirv: yes, that is the next try [16:45] bzoltan_: congrats on starting a build just in time before train apparently went down or something.. getting service unavailable [16:56] Mirv: I was feeling lucky :) and your last idea was the fix.. no postfix is needed in the gles version