| NoklaM | o/ | 03:48 |
|---|---|---|
| === NoklaM_ is now known as NoklaM | ||
| sakrecoer_ | hi ! | 15:25 |
| NoklaM | o/ | 15:25 |
| sakrecoer_ | i think i just assigned flocculant as reviewer for bug-1183096 | 15:25 |
| sakrecoer_ | hi NoklaM :) | 15:26 |
| NoklaM | How's it going sakrecoer_ | 15:28 |
| NoklaM | ? | 15:28 |
| OvenWerks | bug #1183096 | 15:28 |
| ubottu | bug 1183096 in Ubuntu Manual Tests "Test Needed: Scribus" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1183096 | 15:28 |
| NoklaM | Spent half a night figuring out why the microphone wasn't working | 15:31 |
| OvenWerks | Hmm there is no link from the bug to the testcase. | 15:31 |
| NoklaM | Wasn't studios fault although before I realised what was wrong(loose cable) i reinstalled the system temporarly | 15:32 |
| krytarik | sakrecoer_: https://code.launchpad.net/~sakrecoer/ubuntu-manual-tests/bug-1183096/+linkbug | 15:32 |
| sakrecoer_ | krytarik: where do i find the link to that page... | 15:33 |
| krytarik | sakrecoer_: "Link a bug report" on: https://code.launchpad.net/~sakrecoer/ubuntu-manual-tests/bug-1183096 | 15:34 |
| NoklaM | sakrecoer_: if you check your personal launchpad it's there also | 15:34 |
| NoklaM | linked in i think Code tab | 15:34 |
| sakrecoer_ | ah :) of course :) :faceplaming myself: | 15:34 |
| sakrecoer_ | thanks! | 15:34 |
| krytarik | Sure. | 15:34 |
| sakrecoer_ | i followed this template to bzr prush: bzr push lp:~username/ubuntu-manual-tests/bug-BUGNO | 15:35 |
| NoklaM | yup that should do it | 15:36 |
| sakrecoer_ | if i would do that again, but with a different /bug-BUGNO, will it create a new branch? or does bzr... understand the bugnumber? | 15:36 |
| sakrecoer_ | since i had to link the bug from the testcase, i assume it will create a new branch if i change the bug-BUGNO? | 15:37 |
| OvenWerks | sakrecoer_: the bugnumber becomes the name of your personal package | 15:37 |
| OvenWerks | or directory in this case | 15:38 |
| krytarik | sakrecoer_: Funny commit log, btw. :P | 15:38 |
| sakrecoer_ | why? :) | 15:38 |
| sakrecoer_ | it is my first ever so i expect it to be funky :D | 15:39 |
| krytarik | sakrecoer_: Generally you'd want the commit messages to reflect the actual changes - and having them all the same doesn't particularly help. :P | 15:39 |
| OvenWerks | http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~sakrecoer/ubuntu-manual-tests/bug-1183096/files/head:/testcases/packages/Studio/ lists four test cases. scribuse is the only one with no number. | 15:40 |
| OvenWerks | Is that assigned later? | 15:41 |
| NoklaM | Yup after review OvenWerks | 15:41 |
| * OvenWerks thought that might be the case | 15:41 | |
| NoklaM | OvenWerks: mind if i pm you about silly stuff I meant to ask you the other day? | 15:41 |
| sakrecoer_ | krytarik: ok, i'll keep it in mind for next one :) | 15:41 |
| OvenWerks | ok | 15:42 |
| sakrecoer_ | krytarik: if i make a new manual testcase, should i push it to the same branch althought the LP bug has a different number? | 15:44 |
| sakrecoer_ | or does it matter if i have one brnach for each manual testcase? | 15:45 |
| NoklaM | I'd work on one file at a time sakrecoer_ , personal experience with bzr, if you work on more then one it gets messy | 15:46 |
| krytarik | sakrecoer_: Well, since you follow "bzr push lp:~username/ubuntu-manual-tests/bug-BUGNO", it'll be a different one, of course. | 15:46 |
| sakrecoer_ | ok... i feel like i missing some part of the required informartion... | 15:47 |
| krytarik | NoklaM: That's not true though. | 15:47 |
| sakrecoer_ | NoklaM: that is confusing,... i need to make one file for each testcase... and if i have to wait for reviewm i will never get them done.. | 15:48 |
| krytarik | sakrecoer_: That's why you push to different branches. | 15:49 |
| NoklaM | Last time i worked on 2 files with bzr it kept pushing commits to the 1st file where's the commit was 2nd file | 15:49 |
| sakrecoer_ | krytarik: ok... i think i get it :) | 15:49 |
| krytarik | NoklaM: Because I think you did something wrong there. :P | 15:50 |
| NoklaM | krytarik: ofc i did something wrong hehe :P | 15:50 |
| sakrecoer_ | butso its perfectly fine to have one new branch for each manual testcase, althought they all are going to end up in the same branch? | 15:51 |
| NoklaM | branch will be same ubuntu-manual-tests, but each one will have a seprate case | 15:52 |
| krytarik | sakrecoer_: https://code.launchpad.net/ubuntu-manual-tests/+code?field.lifecycle=MERGED&field.lifecycle-empty-marker=1&field.sort_by=by+most+interesting&field.sort_by-empty-marker=1 | 15:54 |
| krytarik | Illustrates it very well. | 15:54 |
| sakrecoer_ | ok :) now i feel my infor is integer again thanks! :) | 15:55 |
| krytarik | NoklaM: For example, this isn't right either: '<NoklaM> it's done by bzr commit -m "Text of what you did goes here" filename'. | 15:58 |
| NoklaM | Isn't it? | 15:58 |
| NoklaM | krytarik: I'm preaty sure i got it of one of the ubuntu websites | 16:00 |
| krytarik | NoklaM: In fact, that's how you messed it up. :D | 16:00 |
| NoklaM | D'oh | 16:00 |
| krytarik | → http://doc.bazaar.canonical.com/latest/en/user-reference/commit-help.html | 16:01 |
| NoklaM | cheers | 16:01 |
| sakrecoer_ | hmm... i also did bzr commit -m "lazytext of what i did" | 16:02 |
| sakrecoer_ | krytarik: what should be done instead? | 16:04 |
| krytarik | sakrecoer_: No, that's the right, more usual way. | 16:04 |
| sakrecoer_ | krytarik: hmm... i can't see the difference with what NoklaM wrote... | 16:05 |
| krytarik | The file name specified. | 16:05 |
| krytarik | That limits the commit to just that one file. | 16:05 |
| sakrecoer_ | aah! of course hah :) tahnks for your patience krytarik :) | 16:05 |
| krytarik | sakrecoer_: You're welcome, of course. :) | 16:08 |
| sakrecoer_ | while writing a testcase for blender, some stuff didn't work... | 16:16 |
| sakrecoer_ | krytarik: what should i do then? file a bug? | 16:16 |
| krytarik | sakrecoer_: Of course. | 16:17 |
| OvenWerks | sakrecoer_: best to do a bit of checking first. does ubuntu have the latest that debian has? | 16:17 |
| sakrecoer_ | blender is crashing when choosing jack as sound engine... | 16:18 |
| OvenWerks | sakrecoer_: that is: should bug report be the bug itself or pulling in the newer blender | 16:18 |
| OvenWerks | sakrecoer_: jack is running? | 16:18 |
| sakrecoer_ | yes | 16:18 |
| OvenWerks | That should not be new code... | 16:19 |
| sakrecoer_ | OvenWerks: jack is running, touching any of the options in audio makes blender freeze- | 16:19 |
| OvenWerks | The jack API has not changed for a long time. | 16:20 |
| sakrecoer_ | so what do you suggest i do? | 16:24 |
| * OvenWerks open blender | 16:27 | |
| * OvenWerks is now lost :P | 16:27 | |
| OvenWerks | I don't have a clue how to even find how to set audio in blender | 16:27 |
| sakrecoer_ | OvenWerks: file>user preferences> system tab | 16:30 |
| NoklaM | i didn't even know blender had audio settings i always thought it only did 3d modeling and such | 16:31 |
| sakrecoer_ | blender is the perfect "blend" between 3d studio max, finalcut, after effects, z-brush, and photoshop | 16:32 |
| NoklaM | Didn't know that wow | 16:33 |
| NoklaM | I used it once tho and got lost in the UI | 16:33 |
| OvenWerks | Ya the learning curve is high | 16:34 |
| sakrecoer_ | check out this short made with it :) https://youtu.be/41hv2tW5Lc4 | 16:34 |
| OvenWerks | I don't have enough of a use for it to go there. | 16:34 |
| NoklaM | Are those actors or CGI? | 16:35 |
| sakrecoer_ | the difficult part is to learn to 3d terminology, and the 3d "thinking" the UI is very unique and scary at first, but very soon it becomes just aweseom | 16:35 |
| sakrecoer_ | the actors are humans.. | 16:35 |
| sakrecoer_ | its the first openmovie whree they mix 3d with real images... its gotten even better now, that was back in 2012 and lots has happened... | 16:35 |
| sakrecoer_ | did i mention how much i love blender ? :D | 16:36 |
| sakrecoer_ | OvenWerks: it works! but you have to set blender to use JACK before jack is started :) | 16:37 |
| sakrecoer_ | then save user settings, quit blender, start jack, open blender and set AV-sync | 16:37 |
| sakrecoer_ | so feature, not bug :D | 16:38 |
| sakrecoer_ | i wish all blender build would come with jack, turns blender into a great VSE with ardour for the audio part :) | 16:38 |
| NoklaM | sakrecoer_: that was one weird short, i have no idea what I've just watched, but it looks like blender capabilities are just wow | 16:43 |
| sakrecoer_ | NoklaM: yeah... the scenarios of the openmovies are not always very good... i think they work on it collectively a bit like surrealist used to do: cadaver exquis :) | 16:51 |
| sakrecoer_ | wb NoklaM :) | 16:54 |
| sakrecoer_ | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exquisite_corpse this is what the openmovie scenario remind me of... sorry for OT.. | 16:55 |
| krytarik | zequence: So, let's have an offtopic channel, too! :P | 17:05 |
| * sakrecoer_ puts on shamehat and walks over to corner | 17:06 | |
| sakrecoer_ | :) | 17:06 |
| krytarik | sakrecoer_: Like I indicated, no need to feel bad here. :) | 17:12 |
| sakrecoer_ | krytarik: (^^,) thanks! | 17:15 |
| krytarik | zequence: Ftm, is there a particular reason why this one has the 's' mode? ("This channel will not appear on channel lists or WHO or WHOIS output unless you are on it.") | 17:19 |
| OvenWerks | krytarik: becasue that way we don't get #ubuntustudio types of questions here | 17:34 |
| OvenWerks | or at least as many | 17:35 |
| krytarik | Heh. | 17:36 |
| krytarik | Ftm, we don't have so many in #xubuntu-devel and #lubuntu-devel either. | 17:42 |
| krytarik | (And they aren't set to be secret.) | 17:43 |
| OvenWerks | not my decision, Just a guess on my part as to why. | 17:44 |
| flocculant | sakrecoer_: thanks - seen your MPs - need a little bit of fixing then push again and I'll be happy | 20:16 |
| flocculant | as I say in comments any action is <dt> and the reaction <dd> :) | 20:17 |
| krytarik | sakrecoer_: Also, the Scribus file shouldn't be in your Blender branch. | 21:22 |
| sakrecoer_ | flocculant: ok :) cool! so... if the scribus file shouldn't be in the blender branch, should i pull a new clone of ubuntu.manual-tests for each testcase? | 21:36 |
| sakrecoer_ | krytarik: | 21:37 |
| sakrecoer_ | how do i push the branch while ommitting all the other testcase files? | 21:38 |
| sakrecoer_ | hmm... "bzr: ERROR: Permission denied: "~sakrecoer/ubuntu.manual/tests/bug-1183096/": : Cannot create branch at '/~sakrecoer/ubuntu.manual/tests/bug-1183096' | 21:49 |
| sakrecoer_ | ah... osrry.. of course... | 21:49 |
| sakrecoer_ | flocculant: i pushed the fixes, i hope that will make it... cant seem propose a merge, because the old one is still active.. | 21:52 |
| sakrecoer_ | (for scirbus) need to sleep, will look into the blender branche tomorrow... | 21:53 |
| sakrecoer_ | thaks for your patience guys! read you soon! | 21:53 |
| krytarik | sakrecoer_: "should i pull a new clone of ubuntu.manual-tests for each testcase?" - Yes, but in this case, it's better to just remove the Scribus file and commit that. | 22:20 |
| krytarik | sakrecoer_: And with your latest push to the Scribus branch, you now mixed it up with Blender, too. :P | 22:28 |
| krytarik | Nvm, I see you reverted that. | 22:29 |
| krytarik | sakrecoer_: You didn't have to do a new MP either, btw. | 22:38 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!