[01:07] <davecheney> ping anyone around who can reivew https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/3899
[04:27] <mup> Bug #1513084 changed: 1.20 cannot upgrade to 1.26-alpha1: run.socket: no such file or directory <1.20> <ci> <intermittent-failure> <run> <upgrade-juju> <juju-core:Won't Fix> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1513084>
[04:30] <mup> Bug #1513084 opened: 1.20 cannot upgrade to 1.26-alpha1: run.socket: no such file or directory <1.20> <ci> <intermittent-failure> <run> <upgrade-juju> <juju-core:Won't Fix> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1513084>
[04:39] <mup> Bug #1513084 changed: 1.20 cannot upgrade to 1.26-alpha1: run.socket: no such file or directory <1.20> <ci> <intermittent-failure> <run> <upgrade-juju> <juju-core:Won't Fix> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1513084>
[05:38] <davecheney> ping anyone around who can reivew https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/3899
[08:15] <blackboxsw> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xzQh-2RCo798SFA5Ac3W-Mk5nhWvdHBxtWRdRTmu5Ts/edit
[08:15] <blackboxsw> landscape-crew ^
[08:15] <blackboxsw> oops
[08:15] <blackboxsw> wrong channel
[10:03] <frobware> voidspace, you about?
[10:09] <frobware> voidspace, http://reviews.vapour.ws/r/3328/
[10:55] <voidspace> frobware: finally online and on freenode
[10:55] <voidspace> frobware: sorry about that
[13:03] <frobware> voidspace, PTAL @ http://reviews.vapour.ws/r/3328/
[13:03] <frobware> voidspace, and then I can land a real fix. :)
[13:17] <voidspace> frobware: looking
[13:19] <voidspace> frobware: LGTM
[13:22] <frobware> voidspace, ty
[14:24] <frobware> voidspace, PTAL @ http://reviews.vapour.ws/r/3329/
[15:14] <voidspace> frobware: will look shortly
[15:51] <voidspace> frobware: LGTM
[16:37]  * frobware waves at the Oakland sprint... o/
[18:38] <mup> Bug #1523626 opened: enable-os-refresh-update: false causes bootstrap to fail <juju-core:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1523626>
[19:47] <mup> Bug #1523608 opened: MAAS 1.9rc3 + Juju 1.25.0:  bootstrap fails, unit has same IP assigned to eth0 and juju-br0 <uosci> <juju-core:New> <MAAS:Incomplete> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1523608>
[20:17] <mup> Bug #1516541 changed: payload/api/private: tests do not pass <juju-core:Fix Released by ericsnowcurrently> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1516541>
[20:21] <jam> frobware: ping. Just wondering what you're plans are for this week. Are you working regular hours or timeshifting or on holiday? :)
[20:22] <frobware> jam: trying to timeshift - mostly with the exception of tomorrow where I plan to start very early and finish by 2pm.
[20:25] <jam> frobware: k. We're going over our plan for the week, so if there is anything you want us to put high in priority, let us know
[20:25] <frobware> jam: CI h/w for testing openstack deployments on MAAS
[20:26] <jam> frobware: isn't that the hardware that is coming in on Dec 9th?
[20:26] <jam> or is that different HW ?
[20:26] <frobware> jam: paas (or maybe I need to read my email)
[20:26] <frobware> jam: ah. is that general CI h/w?
[20:27] <jam> frobware: they are supposed to be getting 6-ish large machines to run a lot of VMs for MAAS CI testing
[20:27] <jam> I thought that included deploying an openstack and upgrading it
[20:28] <frobware> jam: it seems we will need some significant setup on the MAAS side for vlans/spaces, et al.
[20:33] <frobware> cherylj, I will investigate 1523608 tomorrow (or later today)
[21:46] <perrito666> has anyone ever bumped against juju claiming: no registered provider for "local" ?
[21:56] <mup> Bug #1523626 changed: enable-os-refresh-update: false causes bootstrap to fail <juju-core:Won't Fix> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1523626>
[21:59] <mup> Bug #1523626 opened: enable-os-refresh-update: false causes bootstrap to fail <juju-core:Won't Fix> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1523626>
[22:14] <mup> Bug #1523626 changed: enable-os-refresh-update: false causes bootstrap to fail <juju-core:Won't Fix> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1523626>
[22:22] <mgz> wallyworld: see bug 1320312 also, which is about the default behaviour not on aws being bad
[22:22] <wallyworld> mgz: sinzui: bug 1523693
[22:22] <mup> Bug #1320312: fallback to unsigned stream metadata may have security issues <improvement> <metadata> <security> <simplestreams> <juju-core:Triaged> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1320312>
[22:22] <mup> Bug #1523693: Support centos and windows image metadata <juju-core:Triaged by wallyworld> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1523693>
[22:26] <mup> Bug #1523693 opened: Support centos and windows image metadata <juju-core:Triaged by wallyworld> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1523693>
[22:32] <mup> Bug #1523693 changed: Support centos and windows image metadata <juju-core:Triaged by wallyworld> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1523693>
[22:38] <mup> Bug #1523693 opened: Support centos and windows image metadata <juju-core:Triaged by wallyworld> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1523693>
[22:41] <mup> Bug #1523693 changed: Support centos and windows image metadata <juju-core:Triaged by wallyworld> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1523693>
[22:47] <mup> Bug #1523693 opened: Support centos and windows image metadata <juju-core:Triaged by wallyworld> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1523693>
[22:59] <beisner> frobware, yep, will plan to kick off a wily of the same.  but the cloud-init sru / version bump is highly suspect imho
[23:00] <beisner> frobware, i'm eod, will have to revisit in the US morning tomorrow.
[23:00] <frobware> beisner, I wanted to add some automated testing in this area as I'm changing the bridging script quite a bit at the moment
[23:01] <frobware> beisner, ack. time for me to EOD too.