| _shaun_ | hi guys i have a massive image that ubuntu insists on printing to one page, how do i print this image to multiple pages? | 09:03 |
|---|---|---|
| apw | _shaun_, as in like a picture, a camera picture? | 09:22 |
| _shaun_ | hi apw, a png picture | 09:34 |
| apw | _shaun_, i suspect that is outside our expertise; for me i might use imagemagik to make tiles out of it and print those, #ubuntu might know better ways | 09:45 |
| _shaun_ | thanks apw | 12:59 |
| === amitk_ is now known as amitk | ||
| === ivan\_ is now known as ivan\ | ||
| apw | tseliot, it looks like we may have a new regfression in bcmwl in trusty for linux-lts-wily with the latest update | 15:57 |
| davmor2 | apw: an actual one or is the fix not showing up again? | 15:58 |
| apw | davmor2, i have not looked closely, i have just noted that adt is whining about it | 15:59 |
| davmor2 | apw: ah okay | 15:59 |
| apw | davmor2, ok this might be a compiler change .... cc1: warning: unrecognized command line option "-Wno-date-time" [enabled by default] | 16:01 |
| apw | oh no, that is just a warning | 16:01 |
| apw | /var/lib/dkms/bcmwl/6.30.223.248+bdcom/build/src/wl/sys/wl_cfg80211_hybrid.c:2056:4: error: too few arguments to function ‘cfg80211_disconnected’ | 16:01 |
| apw | so likely real and via a stable update | 16:01 |
| davmor2 | apw: I ask because it regularly has to have a patch to make it install so wondered if that might od regressed but it isn't sound like that is the issue at all :) | 16:02 |
| apw | davmor2, na i think we just mashed the kernel api on it by applying a stable update | 16:03 |
| tseliot | apw: fun++ | 16:55 |
| tseliot | apw: can I get the full log, please? | 16:56 |
| apw | tseliot, ok you might want to wait a sec, this might be testing fail --- becuse the testing says you made a .2 and that iwas testing that version but the test has .1 in it | 16:56 |
| apw | tseliot, so i have asked for those to be rerun, and we should recheck when that compltests | 16:56 |
| tseliot | apw: ok | 16:57 |
| apw | tseliot, we did find an error in pinning on trusty not that long ago which might account for these, so i'd like to eliminiate same before i waste any more of your time on this | 16:58 |
| tseliot | apw: thanks | 17:01 |
| apw | tseliot, confirmed this is fixed and working when we test the right combinations; panic over | 18:12 |
| tseliot | apw: good :) | 18:13 |
| tomreyn | hi there. are there known bugs or regressions in 3.13.0-72.115 on trusty, making it fail to boot? | 18:54 |
| apw | tomreyn, yes, it think there is on that one | 18:55 |
| tomreyn | for me, 3.13.0-70.113 boots fine, 3.13.0-72.115 gets stuck while mounting encrypted drives | 18:55 |
| apw | bug #1522766 | 18:56 |
| ubot5 | bug 1522766 in linux (Ubuntu) "cryptsetup hangs after kernel upgrade to 3.13.0-72.115" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1522766 | 18:56 |
| apw | that one is already replaced in -proposed iirc | 18:56 |
| tomreyn | thanks a bunch | 18:56 |
| apw | tomreyn, oh yes encrypted drives for sure | 18:56 |
| tomreyn | i'm also a bit disappointed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1274320 still hasn't made it to LTS | 18:59 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1274320 in grub2 (Ubuntu Vivid) "Error: diskfilter writes are not supported" [High,In progress] | 18:59 |
| tomreyn | comment #125 seems to suggest what needs to be done, but i'm not sure i understand what exactly is being asked for | 19:01 |
| tomreyn | i.e. it seems that mathieu is suggesting that someone who can reproduce this issue should edit the first post and add some information, but i'm not clear which. | 19:02 |
| apw | tomreyn, i think he is asking someone to say that this affects trusty as well (which it clearly does) in the top description and have the bug nomination created for trusty | 19:05 |
| apw | i can nominate it for trusty i would think, if you want to update the description | 19:06 |
| apw | though actually he has already nominated it, and claims it to be in progress | 19:06 |
| apw | yeah he did it for himself, which is confusing having asked :) | 19:07 |
| apw | (see between #126 and #127) | 19:07 |
| tomreyn | hmm, right | 19:08 |
| tomreyn | but nothing since | 19:08 |
| cyphermox | oi | 19:12 |
| apw | oh hey, we were discussing bug #1522766 | 19:12 |
| ubot5 | bug 1522766 in linux (Ubuntu) "cryptsetup hangs after kernel upgrade to 3.13.0-72.115" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1522766 | 19:12 |
| apw | which you fixed up for wily i think it was, and have tasks open for T | 19:13 |
| cyphermox | surely you mean https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1274320 ? | 19:14 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1274320 in grub2 (Ubuntu Vivid) "Error: diskfilter writes are not supported" [High,In progress] | 19:14 |
| apw | yes i mean that one, i am a wally, wrong paste as always | 19:14 |
| apw | discussing two things at once, is apparently beyond me today | 19:14 |
| cyphermox | tomreyn: to clarify, what I was asking was for people to read the wiki page that shows how to request a SRU, and update the bug description with the [Impact] [Test Case] and [Regression Potential] tags so we could know how people plan to test it | 19:15 |
| tomreyn | oh hi cyphermox - I'm the one who brought it up and just updated the bug report. | 19:16 |
| tomreyn | i guess that's not something the average Ubuntu user who is impacted by this bug is into. | 19:16 |
| cyphermox | that only reduces the work for me a tiny little bit but it also makes sure that some people care enough about the bug report that it will eventually get tested in -proposed when the SRU is available, otherwise we might block other things | 19:17 |
| cyphermox | well, that's why there is documentation for it :) | 19:17 |
| tomreyn | i'm a sysadmin and have a little bit of development experience, too, but basically gave up on understading what i should have done after 15 minutes | 19:17 |
| cyphermox | ok | 19:18 |
| cyphermox | then let's take this as a bug to the doc that it should be made cleare | 19:18 |
| cyphermox | *clearer | 19:18 |
| cyphermox | tomreyn: are you able to reproduce the bug easily, say, on a new install? | 19:18 |
| apw | tomreyn, do you have a test system you could try an update on and validate it, without eating your production kit ? | 19:18 |
| tomreyn | cyphermox: i don't have a new install to test on. i have an old one on this system i'm chatting from where i can reproduce it | 19:19 |
| tomreyn | so no, i don'T have a test system for this purpose. | 19:19 |
| tomreyn | i guess i could install a VM, but that'd take a while. | 19:20 |
| tomreyn | could do it, though | 19:20 |
| cyphermox | well, it's not that different from what I'd do anyway | 19:20 |
| cyphermox | tomreyn: I'll prepare a package to upload to trusty-proposed now, and we'll see if we can't convince someone in the SRU team to let it in right away so you can test it | 19:20 |
| tomreyn | great, thank you | 19:21 |
| tomreyn | i guess i could just updat grub on one of my disks and keep it as it is now on the others | 19:21 |
| tomreyn | got multiple disks here | 19:22 |
| tomreyn | (if that would work for testing) | 19:22 |
| cyphermox | I don't know | 19:27 |
| cyphermox | tomreyn: there's already another update going through proposed which should be verified and all before I upload grub2, so this patch will need to wait a bit | 19:31 |
| tomreyn | that's fine ;) | 19:33 |
| tomreyn | i might not be awake enough to test tonight anyways, but surely one of these days. | 19:33 |
| cyphermox | I think it's 2 days away from having stayed there the mandatory 7 days | 19:34 |
| cyphermox | so in the meantime I'll poke the right people so they test their stuff | 19:34 |
| tomreyn | thank you | 19:34 |
| cyphermox | np | 19:35 |
| Quintasan | Bug #1523675 could someone take a look at this and help me debug this? I raised the issue at bug #1389201 but I didn't get much response. | 21:05 |
| ubot5 | bug 1523675 in Ubuntu "Microsoft Ergonomic Keyboard 4000 has two input devices" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1523675 | 21:05 |
| ubot5 | bug 1389201 in systemd (Ubuntu) "[keymap Microsoft Natural Ergonomic Keyboard 4000] Error calling EVIOCSKEYCODE on device node: Invalid argument" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1389201 | 21:05 |
| arges | Quintasan: so you commented out the hwdb rules and this happened? | 21:10 |
| Quintasan | arges: I did not comment them out. | 21:10 |
| Quintasan | This obviously wouldn't help. | 21:10 |
| Quintasan | xev somehow fires no events for the zoom in/out slider | 21:10 |
| Quintasan | but it does fire events for the multimedia keys | 21:10 |
| arges | Quintasan: I'm unfortunately not a systemd expert, did this work with earlier versions and only broke recently? | 21:11 |
| Quintasan | arges: I'm still on 14.04 which doesn't use systemd. | 21:12 |
| arges | Quintasan: i marked your bug as affecting udev/systemd I believe these packages are synced somehow anyway. I would re-ask in #ubuntu-devel to see if there are other debugging techniques to figure out whats going on | 21:14 |
| Quintasan | Alright. | 21:14 |
| arges | Quintasan: if you have the ability live testing a newer ubuntu version would be useful to see if it exhibits the same problem | 21:15 |
| Quintasan | I could try a live cd I guess. I'm not really going to upgrade now since thesis and stuff. | 21:15 |
| arges | Quintasan: understood; good luck | 21:16 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!