[07:37] <flocculant> thanks sakrecoer_ - merged the scribus one
[07:39] <flocculant> and yes as krytarik said - pull it again, when I was doing a bunch at the same time I just renamed the old local copy 
[07:53] <flocculant> mmm - seems the scribus one was mixed up with blender - when I merged blender etc it's also marked your scribus code as merged
[07:55] <flocculant> though only the right one turned up here :p
[09:32] <sakrecoer_> flocculant: i just pushed the corrected blender testcase. created a side folder where i temporarily store the other testcases before i commit and push...
[09:33] <sakrecoer_> flocculant: couldn't find back to that "renew merge request" button... but this is the revision: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~sakrecoer/ubuntu-manual-tests/bug-1184739/revision/366
[09:33] <sakrecoer_> no ubottu ... not bugg 366, revision <3 it's ok you good bot anyway
[09:34] <sakrecoer_> ah... just saw krytarik's chats :) 
[09:34] <sakrecoer_> i'll try to do darktable, fontmanager and fontforge today
[09:38] <sakrecoer_> hmm... got a hash sum mismatch on apt-get update in xenial dev install...
[10:03] <zequence> Not sure how to get a new channel created. Asking around on #ubuntu-irc
[10:11] <sakrecoer_> zequence: i think you just /join it... if its an offtopic channel, perhaps it dosen't have to be "official"...?
[10:46] <sakrecoer_> https://blog.freenode.net/2008/04/registering-a-channel-on-freenode/ "The short version is that official channels (also known as primary channels) are named starting with one #, unofficial (topical or about channels)  start with ##. If your channel is not an official one, please use ## at the start of the channel name, or you may be asked to move."
[12:18] <zequence> sakrecoer_: Yes, that is a way to create a channel, but there are also these official channels like this one.
[12:22] <zequence> astraljava: benonsoftware: cyphermox: DalekSec: eagles0513875_: flocculant: micahg: NoklaM: Noskcaj: OvenWerks: sakrecoer_:
[12:22] <zequence> FYI, I created the channel #ubuntustudio-offtopic, so please make use of it :)
[12:24] <zequence> sakrecoer_: In order to become admin of this channel, you will need to become a member of a launchpad group, so it's no just user administered. But, don't ask me how that stuff really works.
[12:25] <zequence> An offtopic channel doesn't really need to be logged and what else, so in that sense, we could just keep our own for that
[12:25] <zequence> When I say "this", I mean #ubuntustudio-devel, not -offtopic, just to be clear
[12:46] <zequence> Ah, I'm not op of the -offtopic channel. No one is. But, default settings seem ok.
[14:17] <sakrecoer_> right.. i understand :) 
[14:20] <flocculant> sakrecoer_: not sure what's going on - I see you pushed up 4 hours ago, looks like the old one still 
[14:21] <flocculant> and remove scribus when you push it again please
[14:22] <sakrecoer_> flocculant: strange... i did remove it.... hm... let me check it again..
[14:22] <flocculant> ignore me 
[14:23] <sakrecoer_> is it allright?
[14:23] <flocculant> if I pull your branch it's correct 
[14:23] <sakrecoer_> hmm... weird...
[14:23] <flocculant> just seems that LP is all fooey somewhere
[14:25] <sakrecoer_> well... can't help much on that level. But if i have to fix anything with those testcases, do not hesitate in telling me!
[14:25] <sakrecoer_> flocculant: is it the first time there are manual testcases made for the Studio packages?
[14:27] <flocculant> sakrecoer_: your ones? no - there's been a few in the last 2 weeks
[14:27] <flocculant> ok - so that's all done now - on the tracker for Ross 
[14:28] <sakrecoer_> flocculant: well... i'm thinking for blender and all those packages that have a bug filed for missing manual testcase...
[14:28] <sakrecoer_> they should mostely be reusable from release to release..
[14:28] <flocculant> sakrecoer_: yea
[14:29] <flocculant> all that Xubuntu does is check the tests for a new release, then do a bug, mp and update 
[14:33] <flocculant> sakrecoer_: when you do more - you could do a bunch in one MP, just link it to multiple bugs, eg do darktable, fontmanager and fontforge link the code to all 3 bugs
[14:33] <flocculant> or one MP for one bug then rename your local branch and start again
[14:34] <flocculant> one more thing - if you've got a local copy, then bzr pull should bring it up to date to the main branch
[14:34] <sakrecoer_> flocculant: how would i name the branch if i batch push testcases?
[14:35] <flocculant> once you've pushed it you can call it flibbertygibbet if you want :)
[14:35] <flocculant> but
[14:35] <flocculant> if something needs fixing you have to fiddle about with names (I think) 
[14:36] <flocculant> personally, if I was you I would grab the branch, do a bunch, push and link to multiple bugs
[14:36] <flocculant> biab - need lunch 
[14:37] <sakrecoer_> thanks flocculant i'll try that! :) enjoy your meal!
[18:00] <flocculant> sakrecoer_: thanks - done :)
[18:01] <sakrecoer_> wow!! you mind reading too? :D
[18:01] <flocculant> :)
[18:01] <flocculant> just saw it turn up in thunderbird :)
[18:02] <flocculant> I saw that by the time I had seen Draktable you'd already pushed it again :D
[18:02] <sakrecoer_> hhaha!! forgot my typos...
[18:02] <flocculant> :)
[18:03] <sakrecoer_> is it "bzr pull" from within the ubuntu-manual-tests to update my local branch?
[18:03] <sakrecoer_> flocculant: 
[18:03] <flocculant> yep
[18:03] <sakrecoer_> thanks :)
[18:03] <flocculant> should grab 1670_Darktable :)
[18:04] <sakrecoer_> yes! :)
[18:04] <flocculant> \o/
[18:24] <sakrecoer_> i'm trying to find the mail were Ross explianed how to file a bug repport in debian to have latest fontforge version... in vain.... anyone could refresh my memory?
[21:45] <DalekSec> zequence: You should be at least...
[21:45] <DalekSec> IMO, you should have at least +f.