[13:59] <flocculant> balloons: \o/ that code landed :p
[15:20] <jibel> nuclearbob, hey, all the plugins are back on our jenkins instance. urltrigger should work now
[15:21] <nuclearbob> jibel: excellent! I'm working on the other desktop jobs now. Is there a problem with the internal irc server, or is that just me?
[15:21] <jibel> nuclearbob, it's down
[15:21] <nuclearbob> jibel: okay, good to know
[15:22] <flocculant> hi nuclearbob :)
[15:22] <nuclearbob> flocculant: howdy
[15:22] <dobey> jibel: hi. i was wondering if it would be feasible to land https://code.launchpad.net/~dobey/pay-ui/fix-application-file/+merge/279790 into the store without going to through the lengthy qa process, as it's a trivial change and doesn't change the code in the app itself, and since it's a fairly urgent thing to fix
[15:24] <jibel> DanChapman,
[15:25] <jibel> DanChapman, ignore me
[15:26] <jibel> dobey, sounds good to  me. worst case it references another non existent service so no real risk here.
[15:26] <dobey> jibel: great, thanks.
[15:30] <davmor2> jibel: don't say that, DanChapman is English he'll never see another word you type ;)
[15:30] <flocculant> ha ha ha
[15:44] <flocculant> balloons: when you have 5 minutes
[15:46] <balloons> go fori t
[15:49] <flocculant> so bug 1420980
[15:49] <flocculant> in which the link to report a testcase bug has gone - but
[15:49] <flocculant> if we were to add the option back to http://packages.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/350/builds/105268/testcases/1559/results
[15:50] <flocculant> it's going to confuse people with the Link to bug reporting instructions perhaps?
[15:50] <flocculant> and https://codein.withgoogle.com/dashboard/tasks/5854607578234880/ for hello username :p
[15:51] <flocculant> not sure what you think about the testcase bug report button - I can add the task
[15:57]  * balloons is reading
[15:59] <balloons> flocculant, the hello username thing I'm not sure can be controlled in the code
[15:59] <balloons> I  think it's a drupal admin thing.. or really just a drupal, must exist thing
[16:00] <balloons> on the bug reporting link. People kept reporting tracker bugs as testcase issue bugs, and vice versa
[16:00] <balloons> it all kind of needs cleaned up a bit
[16:00] <flocculant> well - it might have helped if *someone* had made that clear on the bug then :p
[16:00] <balloons> flocculant, it's my thoughts right now, lol. I could be wrong
[16:00] <flocculant> ha ha ha
[16:01] <flocculant> well if you find out you can then you can publish :)
[16:02] <flocculant> balloons: ok so would it be possible to add something like (Report a Testcase issue here) instead of calling it a bug?
[16:02] <flocculant> or
[16:02] <flocculant> http://packages.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/350/builds/105268/testcases/1559/results
[16:02] <flocculant> Where you have Testcase - in the grey bar, could the testcase *issue* link be there?
[16:03] <flocculant> balloons: the issue is I've had to move a handful of bugs since we started package testing from 'package' to 'testcase'
[16:16] <balloons> flocculant, I'm open to whatever ideas you have. You and I both know bug reports end up in the wrong place.
[16:18] <flocculant> :)
[16:18] <flocculant> but is that actually possible?
[16:18] <flocculant> if not - back to adding it with the existing items
[16:20] <flocculant> don't want to ask someone to do something that's impossible :D
[16:37] <flocculant> balloons: https://codein.withgoogle.com/dashboard/tasks/6386365331668992/ then :)
[16:38] <balloons> flocculant, that seems ok. We'll likely want to decide between choices I agree
[16:38] <balloons> it's not totally cut and dry
[16:39] <flocculant> yep - thought that was the best option for us - hard to tell without seeing
[16:41] <flocculant> bug 1375456 next - be later - got some r/l to deal with :)
[16:41] <flocculant> which is actually two tasks
[18:24] <balloons> upgraded client, lost my scrollback. Still new shiny things!
[18:48] <flocculant> heh
[19:01] <flocculant> balloons: so what do you think about tasks related to bug 1375456 - as you've lost scrollback and didn't reply before
[19:01] <flocculant> I'd say two tasks there really
[19:02] <balloons> hhmm. So you want more reporting
[19:02] <balloons> I don't know offhand honestly
[19:03] <flocculant> a summary would be useful - certainly easier than parsing 60 lines for a month
[19:03] <balloons> but the task is certainly worth pursuing. IT would force me to hel out
[19:04] <flocculant> or one task - make it give reports/fails/passes/bugs reported - and have a date filter
[19:05] <flocculant> I don't mind honestly, but you wanted tasks so I'm much more inclined to write ones I care about :D
[19:05] <flocculant> and quite honestly - what real use is a report of who's done the most tests
[19:06] <flocculant> anyway - I'll wait for the moment on that
[19:06] <teward> flocculant, that's my opinion - no reason to see who's done the most tests :P
[19:06] <flocculant> nope
[19:06] <teward> (it ain't a contest)
[19:06] <flocculant> not at all
[19:16] <balloons> yea, it's a bit odd that
[19:32] <flocculant> heh
[20:32] <Jav> help
[20:33] <flocculant> we can't - no telepathy installed
[20:33] <flocculant> Jav: what's up?
[20:33] <Jav> package php7.0-interbase
[20:33] <flocculant> Jav: you might want #ubuntu
[20:33] <flocculant> that's a support channel :)
[20:34] <Jav> ahhh
[20:34] <Jav> sorry
[20:34] <Jav> thanks
[20:34] <flocculant> no problem :)
[20:48] <flocculant> dkessel: hey - some guy on the GCI thing is munching through tasks based on tracker issues like chocolate \o/
[20:48] <flocculant> which is good :)
[20:48] <dkessel> flocculant: yeah, i've seen. really great! i get the bug notifications for the qa website
[20:48] <wxl> flocculant: lubuntu made some tasks that included whole test suites. i recommend the same for all ya'll guys if you haven't already
[20:49] <flocculant> wxl: I did that first if you mean packages :)
[20:50] <wxl> flocculant: yeah i can't remember anymore XD
[20:50] <flocculant> wxl: also half sorted on a task to cover the reports bug on tracker - see above ish
[20:50] <wxl> my ideas, your ideas, it's all the same XD
[20:50] <flocculant> wxl:  yea it has been a bit like that for sure
[20:50] <flocculant> wxl:  ofc :D
[20:51] <flocculant> wxl: and a whole slew of small tracker issues are being dealt with already - merged just waiting for them to land
[20:51] <wxl> niiiice!
[20:51] <flocculant> yup
[20:51] <dkessel> balloons: how would i try the new "ubuntu personal" unity8 desktop? using an iso or using a lxd session?
[20:52] <wxl> flocculant: well yeah having this around the holidays is freaking nuts. not to mention that alpha's coming up soon
[20:53] <balloons> dkessel, that's a question for ChrisTownsend, who owes me a wiki update :-)
[20:53] <flocculant> we're not a1'ing
[20:53] <balloons> try asking in #ubuntu-unity :-0
[20:53] <flocculant> pointless
[20:53] <wxl> why for not?
[20:53]  * wxl shrugs
[20:53] <flocculant> ^^
[20:53] <flocculant> especially if 32bit is still not building :)
[20:54] <flocculant> wxl: I guess you have lxqt to think of too
[20:54] <wxl> flocculant: yeah, though that's not going to be released in an lts!
[20:54] <flocculant> coward :D
[20:54] <flocculant> ha ha ha
[20:55] <wxl> heheheh
[20:55] <flocculant> I - as a release team guy - would be NOPE, not having my name on it - not for LTS :p
[20:56] <wxl> yeah that's what i was thinking
[20:56] <wxl> that and we don't have all the packages we need in the repos
[20:56] <wxl> so i can always use that as an  excuse XD
[20:56] <wxl> (though technically the only one missing is the metapackage)
[20:57] <flocculant> wxl: so anyway - balloons is a bit <balloons> hhmm. So you want more reporting
 I don't know offhand honestly about bug 1375456 so another voice from a flavour QA guy would be good :)
[20:57] <wxl> uhhh i thought i threw in for that one
[20:57] <flocculant> missing , between  honestly and about
[20:57] <wxl> elfy and i talked about that a long time ago
[20:58] <flocculant> yea
[20:58] <flocculant> wxl you did a task for it?
[20:58] <wxl> indeed i confirmed it
[20:58] <wxl> and changed the description
[20:58] <flocculant> a GCI task?
[20:58] <wxl> oh there's a task to fix it????
[20:58]  * wxl grins widely
[20:59] <flocculant> no - that's what I mean - a voice from another flavour QA guy needed here ;)
[20:59] <wxl> flocculant: well i could leave a comment that says "me, too," but the bug reporting guidelines suggest otherwise XD
[20:59] <flocculant> I mean in here now :D
[20:59] <wxl> flocculant: then, yes, me, too :)
[21:00] <flocculant> ha ha
[21:08] <wxl> balloons: were you and flocculant discussing doing a task for bug 1375456? if so, i vote yes and would be happy to mentor.
[21:11] <flocculant> I think that possibly the issue might be IS
[21:23] <flocculant> balloons: malevasquez is doing some nice 'bug confirming' for us
[21:23] <wxl> flocculant: link me to said task, would you?
[21:24] <flocculant> wxl: I've got 3 - thunar/parole/menulibre - but https://codein.withgoogle.com/dashboard/tasks/5713974762930176/
[21:24] <flocculant> trying to confirm some newish NEW bugs
[21:26] <wxl> linking upstream is a good idea
[21:26] <flocculant> yea - that's where the 'work' gets done
[21:27] <flocculant> also - for at least menulibre and parole - the dev is in our team, so we talked first :)
[21:28] <wxl> flocculant: i took a slightly different approach https://codein.withgoogle.com/dashboard/tasks/5490678339469312/
[21:28] <flocculant> I might actually ask to get the thunar one unpublished - it's a bit of a 'mare atm
[21:28] <flocculant> wxl: yep I read that task :)
[21:28] <wxl> just added a bonus points for upstream links :)
[21:29] <flocculant> tbh we've not had much traction on those tasks - not very beginner perhaps
[21:30] <wxl> indeed
[21:30] <wxl> i made mine non-beginner
[21:31] <flocculant> well - I like to stretch people :D
[21:31] <flocculant> over a rack often
[21:31] <wxl> hahahahah
[21:31] <wxl> remind me not to visit you any time soon :)
[21:32] <wxl> i wish there was a mailing list where we could talk to students and pitch tasks at them
[21:33] <flocculant> ha ha
[21:33] <flocculant> if ever you get to England - my door is run on an always open basis :)
[21:33] <flocculant> yea - no m/l
[23:04] <balloons> flocculant, can you see https://portal.admin.canonical.com/87354? If not, I assume this will be worked very soon
[23:05] <flocculant> Sorry, you don't appear to have permission to view this page.
[23:05] <flocculant> balloons: ^^
[23:06] <flocculant> waiting for it to be friday for some bonamassa tickets with no fees ...
[23:07] <balloons> flocculant, ahh no worries. Anyways, sometime tonight it will be live
[23:07] <flocculant> heh - I'll be about ...
[23:45] <flocculant> nuclearbob_: I know this must be one of those 'oh fgs things for you - but what's the core with jenkins and flavours?'
[23:45] <flocculant> currently I made a really simple manual test so I can at least let people know when the image had broken
[23:46] <flocculant> I really think that flavours would like to have an answer here - if it is 'you've got no hope' at least it is an answer
[23:47] <flocculant> I don't think that any of us expect anything concrete here - so a sensible answer to whether it's going to occur helps us where we are