/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2015/12/17/#ubuntu-release.txt

rbasakarges: FYI, Juju upstream are reporting regression-update for bug 1361946 in bug 1527020.04:09
ubot5bug 1361946 in gccgo-5 (Ubuntu Utopic) "patches for cgo on arm64" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/136194604:09
ubot5bug 1527020 in juju-core "cannot build trusty ppc64el juju" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/152702004:09
rbasakmwhudson: ^^ could you take a look please?04:09
rbasakIt's frustrating that this was caught by CI but not in trusty-proposed, which would save some pain. I've asked if they could do that.04:09
mwhudsonrbasak: commented08:26
rbasakThank you!08:26
mwhudsonoh hi, not expecting you to be awake08:28
rbasakI am a bit earlier than usual today, but it is 0830 UK time!08:31
rbasakMost normal people here are awake :)08:31
mwhudsonrbasak: pff longitude-normativity, or something08:49
xnoxGood morning release =)11:22
xnoxplease remove NBS ubuntu-desktop/s390x=1.344 in xenial-proposed11:22
cjwatsonxnox: done11:24
xnoxthanks.11:24
cjwatsonstrongly recommend nobody accept perl until all arches are built12:06
cjwatsonhere we go13:57
=== rtg is now known as Guest19398
=== xnox is now known as xnox_2016
jdstrandis something weird happening with the buildds? I just uploaded ubuntu-core-security and all archs failed cause apparmor couldn't be installed and I requested a retry and it has said 'Start in 4 minutes' for several minutes17:38
jdstrandI just tried in a schroot and apparmor installs fine with archive.ubuntu.com with and without proposed18:00
jdstrandThe buildd error is:18:01
jdstrandThe following packages have unmet dependencies:18:01
jdstrand sbuild-build-depends-ubuntu-core-security-dummy : Depends: apparmor but it is not going to be installed18:01
jdstrandE: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.18:01
jdstrandinfinity: you around? ^18:01
jdstrandthe start in 4 minutes was on amd64 which has a bunch of disabled builders and many in the Cleaning state18:02
apwjdstrand, got a build log (if it isn't secret)18:02
jdstrandhttps://launchpadlibrarian.net/230360627/buildlog_ubuntu-xenial-s390x.ubuntu-core-security_16.04.9_BUILDING.txt.gz18:02
jdstrandI retried on s390x cause it had some free builders18:03
jdstrand(but same thing)18:03
jdstrandah, I think I am getting somewhere locally18:08
jdstrandapparmor : Depends: libapparmor-perl but it is not going to be installed18:08
jdstrand libapparmor-perl : Depends: perlapi-5.20.18:13
jdstrandah, seems apparmor needs a rebuild for the perl in proposed18:13
infinityjdstrand: It's the perl transition, cjwatson is working on it.18:37
jdstrandinfinity: yeah, it took me a while to get there18:38
infinityjdstrand: We'll do a mass give-back once the world is happily transitioned.18:38
jdstrandcjwatson: fyi, I uploaded a no change rebuild of apparmor18:38
bdmurrayIs there any reason to be cautious about releasing the Trusty fix for LP: #1273462?18:41
ubot5Launchpad bug 1273462 in upstart (Debian) "Users can mistakenly run init.d scripts and cause problems if an equivalent upstart job already exists" [Unknown,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/127346218:41
infinitybdmurray: People seem to be more or less happy with it.18:57
bdmurrayinfinity: okay19:07
bdmurrayAm I missing something? I don't see location-service in landing ppa 2. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/vivid/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text= yet there is a sync request for it...19:07
infinitybdmurray: Tons of us were concerned about the change being made at all, but I'm not sure it's worth rehashing THAT debate again after it was finally accepted into -proposed.19:07
bdmurrayinfinity: I was just wondering about the wisdom of releasing it before the holidays.19:08
infinitybdmurray: https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/landing-002/+packages?field.name_filter=location-service&field.status_filter=&field.series_filter=19:08
infinitybdmurray: Someone was naughty and emptied the silo before it was accepted/rejected in the queue, but if it's still downloadable, it's still copyable.19:09
bdmurrayah, thnks19:09
infinitybdmurray: OTOH, that may have been a mistake.19:09
infinitybdmurray: Given vivid silos build against the overlay, and that sure looks like an overlay-destined upload.19:10
infinitybdmurray: Releasing to the archive was probably an oops.19:10
infinitybdmurray: And definitely not acceptable if it's a copy with binaries, since it has overlay deps.19:10
infinitybdmurray: And, indeed, the copy contains binaries, so just reject it.19:11

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!