[04:09] <rbasak> arges: FYI, Juju upstream are reporting regression-update for bug 1361946 in bug 1527020.
[04:09] <rbasak> mwhudson: ^^ could you take a look please?
[04:09] <rbasak> It's frustrating that this was caught by CI but not in trusty-proposed, which would save some pain. I've asked if they could do that.
[08:26] <mwhudson> rbasak: commented
[08:26] <rbasak> Thank you!
[08:28] <mwhudson> oh hi, not expecting you to be awake
[08:31] <rbasak> I am a bit earlier than usual today, but it is 0830 UK time!
[08:31] <rbasak> Most normal people here are awake :)
[08:49] <mwhudson> rbasak: pff longitude-normativity, or something
[11:22] <xnox> Good morning release =)
[11:22] <xnox> please remove NBS ubuntu-desktop/s390x=1.344 in xenial-proposed
[11:24] <cjwatson> xnox: done
[11:24] <xnox> thanks.
[12:06] <cjwatson> strongly recommend nobody accept perl until all arches are built
[13:57] <cjwatson> here we go
[17:38] <jdstrand> is something weird happening with the buildds? I just uploaded ubuntu-core-security and all archs failed cause apparmor couldn't be installed and I requested a retry and it has said 'Start in 4 minutes' for several minutes
[18:00] <jdstrand> I just tried in a schroot and apparmor installs fine with archive.ubuntu.com with and without proposed
[18:01] <jdstrand> The buildd error is:
[18:01] <jdstrand> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
[18:01] <jdstrand>  sbuild-build-depends-ubuntu-core-security-dummy : Depends: apparmor but it is not going to be installed
[18:01] <jdstrand> E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
[18:01] <jdstrand> infinity: you around? ^
[18:02] <jdstrand> the start in 4 minutes was on amd64 which has a bunch of disabled builders and many in the Cleaning state
[18:02] <apw> jdstrand, got a build log (if it isn't secret)
[18:02] <jdstrand> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/230360627/buildlog_ubuntu-xenial-s390x.ubuntu-core-security_16.04.9_BUILDING.txt.gz
[18:03] <jdstrand> I retried on s390x cause it had some free builders
[18:03] <jdstrand> (but same thing)
[18:08] <jdstrand> ah, I think I am getting somewhere locally
[18:08] <jdstrand> apparmor : Depends: libapparmor-perl but it is not going to be installed
[18:13] <jdstrand>  libapparmor-perl : Depends: perlapi-5.20.
[18:13] <jdstrand> ah, seems apparmor needs a rebuild for the perl in proposed
[18:37] <infinity> jdstrand: It's the perl transition, cjwatson is working on it.
[18:38] <jdstrand> infinity: yeah, it took me a while to get there
[18:38] <infinity> jdstrand: We'll do a mass give-back once the world is happily transitioned.
[18:38] <jdstrand> cjwatson: fyi, I uploaded a no change rebuild of apparmor
[18:41] <bdmurray> Is there any reason to be cautious about releasing the Trusty fix for LP: #1273462?
[18:57] <infinity> bdmurray: People seem to be more or less happy with it.
[19:07] <bdmurray> infinity: okay
[19:07] <bdmurray> Am I missing something? I don't see location-service in landing ppa 2. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/vivid/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text= yet there is a sync request for it...
[19:07] <infinity> bdmurray: Tons of us were concerned about the change being made at all, but I'm not sure it's worth rehashing THAT debate again after it was finally accepted into -proposed.
[19:08] <bdmurray> infinity: I was just wondering about the wisdom of releasing it before the holidays.
[19:08] <infinity> bdmurray: https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/landing-002/+packages?field.name_filter=location-service&field.status_filter=&field.series_filter=
[19:09] <infinity> bdmurray: Someone was naughty and emptied the silo before it was accepted/rejected in the queue, but if it's still downloadable, it's still copyable.
[19:09] <bdmurray> ah, thnks
[19:09] <infinity> bdmurray: OTOH, that may have been a mistake.
[19:10] <infinity> bdmurray: Given vivid silos build against the overlay, and that sure looks like an overlay-destined upload.
[19:10] <infinity> bdmurray: Releasing to the archive was probably an oops.
[19:10] <infinity> bdmurray: And definitely not acceptable if it's a copy with binaries, since it has overlay deps.
[19:11] <infinity> bdmurray: And, indeed, the copy contains binaries, so just reject it.