/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2015/12/21/#ubuntu-kernel.txt

apwNoskcaj, that might be a plymouth issue which just got fixed00:30
TJ-apw: quick Q on behalf of a user: when is the Wily kernel matching the 4.2.8 stable mainline due? There's some BTRFS bugs the user has suffered from00:32
TJ-User relies on AUFS too for LXC/LXD so can't simply switch to a mainline build. I suggests the Xenial 4.3.3 but that breaks user's ZFS DKMS module builds :)00:33
apwTJ-, xenial should have zfs built-in though01:01
apwTJ-, i would expect 4.2.8 to be in the next upload, but that is likely 5 weeks out01:02
TJ-apw: I didn't know that; I'll tell the user next time they pop up :)01:02
TJ-Yes, I thought it'd be next month for 4.2.8.01:03
=== _fortis_ is now known as _fortis
PETSoundsHi. Which kernel version best for Intel Skylake?14:34
PETSoundsi am currently on WIly kernel, but the performance is not that smooth. Just wonder if upgrading Kernel and Intel Graphics driver will improve the performance.14:39
apwPETSounds, hmmm, well vivid was the first one to have any kind of support and that was backported, wily is intended to have native support14:47
apwPETSounds, that said, it is very new even there, so you might find the xenial 4.3 kernel has some benefits, and we would be interested if so14:47
PETSoundsapw: thanks for your response. What do i need to do to make Broadcom driver doesn't stop working when upgrading Kernel? 14:49
apwPETSounds, bcmwl ?14:50
PETSoundsi upgraded14:51
PETSoundsi upgraded the kernel from http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/?C=N;O=D and WLAN stops working14:51
apwPETSounds, very likely, if it is bcmwl, you would want to get a copy of that from xenial as well as that is sync'd with the kernel in xenial14:51
apwPETSounds, note i am talking about the ubuntu archive xenial 4.3 kernel not the ones in mainline-build respository14:52
PETSoundsapw: ahh ok. thank you. i'll try again and report back.14:53
=== cyphermox_ is now known as cyphermox
yoasifany chance anyone can tell me when we can expect a new kernel based on http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1527359 ?15:19
ubot5Launchpad bug 1527359 in linux (Ubuntu Wily) "Wily update to v4.2.8 stable release" [Undecided,Confirmed]15:19
yoasiflooking for fixes http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git/ubuntu/ubuntu-wily.git/commit/?h=master-next&id=c7c784296cf04c0757f39aa00c77d12a4f2a5548 and http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git/ubuntu/ubuntu-wily.git/commit/?h=master-next&id=9e0d373b6959298b9a07cb2975d04a7aac7e0e2315:20
apwyoasif, that is already applied to master-next so it should be in the next sru cycle, which is about 5 weeks out with xmas in the way15:20
TJ-yoasif: aha, I asked apq about this last night. You should be able to use the Xenial kernel since it has the ZFS driver built-in - no need for the DKMS15:21
apwyoasif, is there a bug filed for your specific issue, is so i could spin you up a test kernel to confirm that the update is what you need15:21
TJ-s/apq/apw/15:21
yoasifapw: ouch — so right now i'm running the mainline build from the kernel ppa page but there's no -extras package (so no aufs and docker doesn't work)… any chance there's an easy way to build an extras package for the mainline kernel?15:22
apw(the bug gives me something to publish against15:22
yoasif(the issue has been fixed in mainline http://kernel.ubuntu.com/%7Ekernel-ppa/mainline/v4.2.8-wily/15:22
apwyoasif, there are no extras packages for mainline builds, it is disabled, which means everything is builtin, but aufs is not in mainline so you don't get that15:23
yoasifyeah :/15:23
apweverything is in the linux-image which exists15:23
apwi can buid you a test kernel against that tip to use till the official one comes out in the new year if that is of use15:23
yoasifbut i should be able to use xenial's kernel with that extras package for the time being (since zfs is built in?)15:24
apwxenials kernel contains the zfs bits nativly, but it might be simpler15:24
apwfor you to have a test kernel from me, which would sit version wise in the middle and upgrade correctly when15:24
apwthe real distro kernel comes out15:24
apwif everything you need is in the .8 update15:25
yoasifapw: i'd really appreciate that — but i'd need -extras too, since aufs isn't in mainline :/15:25
apwyoasif, extras comes out as part of the build automatically for the ubuntu builds15:25
yoasifright now i'm running mainline, but i can't run docker, so i don't have any services running ;)15:26
yoasif(been replacing disks on my btrfs raid, and the hard lockups were really annoying) 15:26
apwyep those are only there for problem isolation, they aren't production quality by any means15:27
yoasifapw: so if you were to create a test kernel, would i be able to have aufs as a module (easily)? 15:30
apwyes, it would be an intermim build just the same as if i had uploaded the current state of the tree15:30
apwyoasif, i assume you are needing an x86 kernel of one size or other15:31
yoasifx64, yeah15:31
yoasifapw: the mainline build is actually more "production quality" (in that it doesn't lock up) than the stable ubuntu build besides the fact that i don't have aufs as a module ;)15:38
apwyoasif, well that is btrfs, that well known awsome filesystem15:40
yoasifapw: i'm on the hype train for it… not as stable as zfs yet, but feature wise, it allows me to expand arrays without creating new vdevs — it's going to be fantastic once it is stable, but definitely experiencing some growing pains 15:41
yoasifalso built the array prior to zfs being available in ubuntu without ppas15:42
apwyoasif, "once" it is stable, it is years old now, it reallly should be there by now if it is going to be15:43
* apw strokes his ext4 filessytem gently, good filesystem15:43
yoasifbeen experiencing this issue for weeks now, even decided to build a new machine for it (not that i'm complaining) 15:44
yoasifnever quite understood lvm (i should learn) and i was used to zfs, so been using btrfs; ext4 was never an option for this15:45
yoasif(running ext4 on top of lvm for my root though) 15:45
apwyeah i am old school most of my boxes are whatever ordinary filesystems on top of lvm15:46
apwwhich i am now at least at some kind of agreement with, it doesn't mess with me too much and i don't ask it to change much15:46
yoasifwell, there are supposed to be integrity guarantees with btrfs; unfortunately, i have lost data once with btrfs (ran a fsck on an array where one of the disks had dropped out and seen subsequent writes — destroyed the array for the most part) 15:48
yoasifnever lost data with zfs though, been using an array for years now, even with bad disks15:48
yoasif(should have scrubbed again and again before trying fsck)15:49
apwfsck on btrfs has a bit of a reputation for being worse than not bothering15:49
apwand hoping for the best ...15:50
yoasifwell, the mailing list is great … "if you don't have backups, you clearly didn't care about the data"15:50
yoasif(which is true, but doesn't change the fact that this shouldn't happen) 15:50
apwyoasif, such an inspiring position :)15:50
apwyoasif, http://people.canonical.com/~apw/stable-4.2.8-wily/15:53
yoasifbut yeah, in case anyone wanted some unsolicited advice; do not fsck your btrfs array… try to do as many online scrubs as you can until you don't see errors15:53
yoasifapw: not local to my machine right now, but i *really* appreciate you taking the time… will report back tomorrow morning (or tonight if you are around) 15:54
yoasif(no docker means no openvpn either ;) )15:54
apwyoasif, my nick is always arround, my body less reliably, but yeah let me know if that gets you going again15:55
yoasifapw: definitely will do15:55

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!