[04:55] <Hitechcg> How long am I banned for?
[04:56] <rww> @btlogin
[04:59] <rww> Hitechcg: going to behave in there if I unban you?
[04:59] <Hitechcg> yeah
[05:00] <rww> alrighty. it's generally a lot harder to get unbanned if it becomes a repeat thing
[05:00] <rww> one sec
[05:00] <Hitechcg> it was a permaban?
[05:00] <rww> I've removed your ban. For future reference,
[05:00] <rww> !guidelines
[05:01] <rww> Bans don't have expiration dates by default. Some of us set them, some of us don't. This one didn't have one that I can see.
[05:04] <Hitechcg> oh, someone told me that a bot would automatically remove them eventually
[10:56] <ikonia> is ubottu still klined ?
[10:57] <DJones> I think so, it was klined, then rejoined and was klined again
[10:57] <DJones> Pricey: Can you unkline ubottu?
[10:58] <ikonia> do we know if anyone has sent an official request to the kline email to get it removed/find out why it was klined if there is a problem with it
[10:58] <ikonia> I doubt it's gone mental or anything, but it is possible
[10:59]  * Pricey looks
[10:59] <DJones> It looks as though it was during a mass split/rejoin period
[11:01] <Pricey> Looks like it's expired to me.
[11:01] <Pricey> "Banned due to too many  failed login attempts (SASL https://freenode.net/sasl/) in a short period
[11:01] <Pricey> "
[11:01] <ikonia> probably did go mad during a split then
[11:02] <Pricey> There may be other connections from that host, but make sure they have correct passwords & are set to identify to a specific account rather than the currently used nickname.
[11:02] <ikonia> will do
[11:03] <Pricey> Let me know if you're still getting the error when trying to reconnect, but I'm pretty sure you should be good to go.
[11:03] <ikonia> I'll see if one of the chaps with access can ask it to boot again
[13:56] <Pici> Pricey: thanks for taking a look the bots.
[13:56] <Pricey> Pici: All sorted now?
[13:56] <Pici> Pricey: yep
[13:56] <Pricey> Good stuff, no problem, I didn't do anything :)
[13:57] <Pricey> Those bans aren't very lengthy, just annoying enough to hopefully get people to check their auth settings if the're not malicious.
[14:05] <bazhang> It was for release 16.57.
[14:19] <Pici> very confuse
[14:49] <k1l> a TJ to the rescue
[16:37] <k1l> h1tl3r (~smuxi@c-73-132-149-248.hsd1.md.comcast.net)    obviously wrong nick
[16:51] <k1l> why do other distributions users sound like x/k/l/ubuntu is limiting the userexperience on purpose?
[16:53] <Pici> k1l: I'm not sure why you said that Ubuntu doesn't separate free and non-free, because thats exactly what the restricted and multiverse repositories are for
[17:22] <k1l> Pici: imho that is a different handling than fedora or debian do. iirc they do not even ship nvidia drivers while on ubuntu they do.
[19:19] <rww> k1l: Debian and Ubuntu have pretty much the same handling, except instead of restricted+multiverse it's contrib+non-free
[19:20] <rww> contrib being free stuff that depends on non-free stuff, and non-free being non-free
[19:20] <rww> the only other difference I can think of is that Debian splits out non-free firmware into a separate non-free package, which iirc Ubuntu doesn't do (but it's been ages)
[19:20] <rww> as far as I know, you are however correct about Fedora
[19:34] <Unit193> contrib doesn't have to depend, can simply recommend (I have one that does.)
[20:17] <Unit193> k1l: That ban will only last a day, though.
[20:17] <k1l> i didnt ban
[20:17] <Unit193> I know, you were going to, and that's the difference between you doing it and Drone`.
[20:19] <k1l> actually no. i did not call the kick+ban trigger. i thought it would be enough
[20:19] <Unit193> Ah, OK.  Nevermind. :3