[00:20] so, never saw an official go ahead... should I go ahead and package it up? [00:20] Only if you want something to ftbfs on you! :D [00:21] * bluesabre cries [00:22] Oh right, I think I asked you if we were going to try and slip an xfdashboard in, what'd you say? [00:25] probably "hmmm" [00:25] then we poked micahg [00:25] Ah. [00:27] I'll look into the light-locker merge now, unless you've already started that somewhere [00:27] 'course not, wasn't sure what was going on with that one or if it needed any testing first. [00:27] ah, see this now https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/light-locker/+bug/1527936 [00:27] Launchpad bug 1527936 in light-locker (Ubuntu) "Merge 1.7.0-2 from debian" [Wishlist,New] [00:29] I'll take a look at that, maybe toss it into -staging for folks to play with [00:32] bluesabre, I've got school holidays till the end of january, so let me know if there's anything that needs doing [00:33] Noskcaj: good to know [00:33] hopefully I'll have something for you and Unit193 to do soon [00:33] sorry for the boring cycle so far [00:33] :) [00:49] LTS, expected. What you don't know is what goes into my own efforts. :3 [01:24] :) [04:13] At first glance, light-locker 1.7 seems to work just fine [04:13] I'll drop it in staging for now, let qa kick it, and probably upload tomorrow night [04:16] flocculant: new light-locker uploaded to -staging. Nothing particularly exciting in 1.7, https://github.com/the-cavalry/light-locker/blob/master/NEWS [04:17] but then, maybe that is exciting :D [04:28] :D [06:47] bluesabre, re: the black blink, i think i only have it on the intel GPU laptop now... [06:47] but again, i'll get back to you [06:47] now breakfast with guests [06:47] bbl [07:29] bluesabre: lightlocker pretty much doesn't give me grief - no laptop to close the lid on ... [07:46] bluesabre: I did a quick call on it - I don't expect much to happen so ... [07:50] fwiw - no problem with it doing what it can here :) === Punna is now known as Pwnna === SwissBot_ is now known as SwissBot [10:20] hi everyone [10:21] seems my remote login locked me out there [11:33] knome: I haven't been able to reproduce it with intel or nvidia [11:33] flocculant: cool [11:33] ochosi: morning [11:41] hey bluesabre1 === bluesabre1 is now known as bluesabre [11:41] i'll be around today for a bit, any urgent things i should be looking at? [11:41] hey ochosi [11:41] (saw a powerman panel plugin leak) [11:42] nothing in particular that I know about [11:42] ok, other than that i'll look into gtk3 theme breakage (if there is any) [11:42] light-locker 1.7 is in -staging for xenial, if you haven't kicked those tires enough already [11:43] 3.20 will mean i will have to rewrite greybird :/ [11:43] yup [11:43] until then i'll try to do as little changes [11:43] as possible [11:43] anyhow, out for lunch now but i'll be back in 1hr [11:43] since that will probably be a monster-sized change [11:43] i presume you'll be out then, right? [11:43] alrighty [11:44] close to it [11:44] well not a change, it'll have to be redone from scratch [11:44] i'll rebase on adwaita i guess [11:44] and sass and all that crap [11:44] not a lot of fun coming my way [11:44] anyway, gotta run, ttyl! [11:44] seeya ochosi [11:45] (might also be around tonight, if you wanna look into something together) [11:46] cool, I'll see if I can get something together [14:07] flocculant: i'm pretty sure you're well aware, but there are no dl-links for xenial on the qatracker: http://packages.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/350/builds/105268/downloads [14:07] what did i miss there? :) [14:16] the download links? [14:21] yeah, i guess i need to recount the path i took to end up there [14:43] danke, ebenso === cyphermox_ is now known as cyphermox [16:59] ochosi: well - tbh I have never looked on the package tracker for a daily iso [17:01] reported the bug [18:08] flocculant: sure, nvm, just felt i should ask whether anyone ever noticed [18:09] anyway, checking out xenial now [18:09] Speaking of Xenial... [18:11] yes? [18:11] (also just noticed plymouth still needs a bump, plus the dev wallpaper should be set... bluesabre! :)) [18:21] bluesabre: ok i did the two things i mentioned before and pushed them to xubuntu-artwork, so whenever you upload a new version... [18:22] Unit193: was there anything specifically..? [18:23] ochosi: did it boot to desktop or did you see the Try/Install dialogue? not had time to look yet today [18:23] seems like everything is working fine [18:24] i'm already installing from the "try xubuntu" live-session [18:24] unfortunately the part where the installer retrieves "additional files" is slow... [18:24] right - so the bug has gone then \o/ [18:24] not sure why [18:24] coolcool [18:24] so my test was actually useful \o/ [18:25] \o/ [18:26] mmm 32 bit still lands straight on the desktop :( [18:27] hmright [18:27] i was using 64bit [18:27] so did 64 here [18:27] at least vm [18:27] brb [18:27] anyhoo, gotta run out for two hours or so [18:27] i'll be back then though [18:28] okey doke [18:29] ttyl [19:06] fyi light-locker 1.7 just got uploaded [19:09] ooooo i386 [20:21] https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2015-December/039059.html [20:29] yea [20:29] ignoring that [20:29] :D [20:30] 1 year VPS money approved [20:30] pleia2: cool :) [20:31] Wow. So he didn't get back on a sponsor, or none willing, btw? [20:32] Unit193: he's looking at a longer view of having sponsors for not just us, but various community initiatives across the project [20:32] so that may take a while, and he doesn't want to hold is up [20:32] pleia2: Ok, well that's cool then too, actually. [20:33] sounds so :) [20:34] flocculant: Will be popping xfdash up for you here in aminute. [20:37] Unit193: indeed :) [20:38] Unit193: what a lovely chap you are :) [20:39] I probably won't get to standing up the VPS today, but soon [20:40] pleia2: when it's done it's done :) [22:34] evening all [22:34] ochosi: d'oh [22:34] :D [22:35] Noskcaj: good work [23:04] bluesabre, Are mugshot, menulibre, and catfish in a state that they can be uploaded to debian yet? [23:19] bluesabre: well anyway, i guess since both things were in -artwork it was all my fault :> [23:22] Mhmm, clearly. [23:22] bluesabre: also, i noticed in xenial that while elementary is installed for LO it's not used by default (maybe we talked about this already a longer while ago, if so, sorry i forgot all about it) [23:22] * Unit193 nods. [23:23] also meh, extra border around comboboxes in headerbars in xenial [23:23] (see e.g. catfish's location selector) [23:25] and gee, the open file dialog is broken in various ways (sidebar, toolbars) [23:39] Noskcaj: I'd recommend waiting until the stable series of each [23:39] ochosi: yeah, its an off and off problem [23:39] ok. Any idea when those will come out? [23:40] ochosi: its a bit of a pain to set a default, usually lo grabs things alphabetically [23:40] Noskcaj: sometime in the next few weeks [23:40] ok, cool [23:40] bluesabre: "When it's stable" :D [23:42] ochosi: that issue should be resolved once we make sure lo-elementary is in a good state in lo upstream, then we can get the packaging updated in xenial so we can install only that theme [23:42] Unit193: :D [23:43] ochosi: haven't looked, but guessing its related to hard-coding gtk3 dialogs to not have csds in ubuntu [23:48] really need to stop patching that out... either fix the underlying issues in gtk or fix the window manager :D [23:49] GTK, I don't want them either! [23:54] yeah, but its in the toolkit now, and apps are going that way, time to find some new apps ;) [23:54] dinner time, bbabl [23:54] I have, at least some. :D [23:55] you mean old apps [23:55] :P