[04:02] <CarlFK> https://launchpad.net/~carlfk/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+build/8748885
[04:02] <CarlFK> how long from "      Successfully built..." till I can apt-get it ?
[04:02] <CarlFK> oh wait.. wrong package...
[07:29] <ESphynx> hey guys, I always get an error trying to delete a recipe... (Error ID: OOPS-9b43fcb814667c3eba45473fb24f31bd)
[07:45] <wgrant> ESphynx: That's a timeout due to the number of builds that recipe has. If you retry a few times it might work.
[07:45] <wgrant> But if there are too many builds it might simply take too long to break the links.
[07:46] <wgrant> ESphynx: Do you particularly need to delete it?
[07:48] <ESphynx> wgrant: I did retry many times
[07:48] <ESphynx> wgrant: It's an old recipe that was for Lucid builds, since Launchpad no longer supports Lucid builds...
[07:48] <ESphynx> https://code.launchpad.net/~jerstlouis/+recipe/ecere-daily-lucid  -- That's the recipe
[07:52] <wgrant> ESphynx: Try now?
[07:55] <ESphynx> Timeout error
[08:15] <wgrant> :(
[13:58] <kyrofa> Hey all, I have an LP API question
[13:58] <kyrofa> Actually, perhaps a number of questions. First of all, does anyone know of a script already written that will verify that a developer with a given email address has signed the CLA?
[13:59] <kyrofa> (which is what I'm trying to do)
[14:02] <kyrofa> If not, I'm trying to figure out a way to check is a given user is a member of the CLA signers group. But I'm not sure how to work up to the group from the user, especially with the ability for a user to be a member of a group by being a member of another group :P
[14:04] <cjwatson> kyrofa: I don't know of such a script, but that should basically be a one-liner: lp.people.getByEmail(email=foo) in lp.people['contributor-agreement-canonical'].participants
[14:04] <cjwatson> (participants contains both direct and indirect members)
[14:05] <cjwatson> kyrofa: (beware that Canonical employees won't necessarily have explicitly signed the CLA, so you may want to check for participation in ~canonical too; and this will only work for people whose e-mail address is public)
[14:05] <kyrofa> cjwatson, ah, quick and easy!
[14:06] <kyrofa> cjwatson, and yeah, I personally haven't signed it, so that was exactly my plan :)
[14:08] <kyrofa> cjwatson, oh, except that group is private-- I can't check membership anonymously
[14:08] <kyrofa> Hmm
[14:17] <cjwatson> kyrofa: tarmac has an allowedcontributors plugin that does something similar, BTW.  of course it would still have to have access to ~canonical membership somehow, I forget how that typically works
[14:18] <kyrofa> cjwatson, I'm working on a github integration
[14:18] <cjwatson> sure, just as example code
[14:19] <kyrofa> cjwatson, oh, good idea. I'll go take a look :)
[14:24] <kyrofa> cjwatson, ah, it logs in as some tarmac user