[08:46] <davidcalle> Good morning o/
[10:44] <dandrader> Saviq, regarding that Qt.application.state: we are reverting first and fixing later?
[10:44] <dandrader> Saviq, didn't look yet, but fix should be as simple as not deleting the code that the original MP removed
[10:44] <dandrader> Saviq, as they are too separate, independent, APIs
[11:35] <Mirv> qtmultimedia migrated to release pocket in xenial
[11:59] <dandrader> Saviq, got an MP with the proper fix for bug 1528668
[13:25] <Saviq> dandrader|afk, state wasn't working either (and actually it does work after the revert)
[13:26] <Saviq> I'm inclined to wait for a test suite before merging this again...
[13:31] <Saviq> since it doesn't obviously improve anything (as .state still switches between {in,}active)
[14:19] <tsdgeos> jhodapp: ping
[14:20] <jhodapp> tsdgeos, pong
[14:20] <tsdgeos> jhodapp: i tried the phablet-dev-bootstrap several tiems but it always ends up giving me an error
[14:20] <tsdgeos> jhodapp: how do you want me to proceed with this crash? open a bug? or?
[14:21] <jhodapp> tsdgeos, what kind of error and in what part of the process?
[14:21] <tsdgeos> i'll give you a paste
[14:21] <tsdgeos> give me a min
[14:21] <dandrader> Saviq, don't what you said
[14:22] <dandrader> s/don't/don't get
[14:22] <jhodapp> tsdgeos, ok
[14:26] <Saviq> dandrader, let me start again - the original change that I'm reverting does not improve anything obvious, as Qt.application.state and .active both work without it
[14:27] <Saviq> dandrader, seeing as we've failed a lot these last few times between qtmir and qtubuntu, I'm inclined to wait until we have a test suite for qtubuntu to merge this
[14:27] <dandrader> Saviq, 1- it updates the state in more situations, making it more accurate (such as when the window gets unfocused)
[14:27] <Saviq> yes, I understand
[14:27] <dandrader> Saviq, 2- it sets the Suspended state appropriately
[14:27] <Saviq> in any case, January, since QA isn't working any more anyway
[14:27] <dandrader> Saviq, without it, you would get inactive only when suspended
[14:28] <Saviq> dandrader, sure, what I mean is we've been living without it, so we can wait a bit and get it unit-tested, so when we introduce it again we can actually be sure we've not broken anything
[14:29] <dandrader> Saviq, so is that how it's going to be for any qtubuntu change from now on?
[14:30] <Saviq> dandrader, yes, we need unit tests for all changes there, we've broken it too much recently
[14:30] <dandrader> Saviq, not sure it's unit testable
[14:31] <Saviq> dandrader, then we need higher level tests for it, something automated
[14:32] <tsdgeos> jhodapp: now is suddenly doing differnent things, i don't understand that command, bear with it until it finishes/fails again :D
[14:32] <jhodapp> tsdgeos, ok
[14:35] <Saviq> dandrader, so yeah, let's focus first in January on getting a plan for testing this
[14:35] <Saviq> if it's an autopilot test, so be it
[16:32] <prsteele> hello. Anyone here know how Unity launches the indicator applets? In particular, I want to be able to add the unity indicators to a trayer tray
[16:52] <dandrader> Saviq, qtmlr got contaminated with untity7 tags :/
[16:52] <dandrader> qtmir
[17:02] <Saviq> dandrader, yeah, long time ago
[17:36] <dandrader> tedg, around?
[21:09] <frecel> hello
[21:09] <frecel> is there a way to use SystemComponentes through pygobject or some other python lib?
[21:10] <frecel> mhall119: ^