[08:46] Good morning o/ [10:44] Saviq, regarding that Qt.application.state: we are reverting first and fixing later? [10:44] Saviq, didn't look yet, but fix should be as simple as not deleting the code that the original MP removed [10:44] Saviq, as they are too separate, independent, APIs [11:35] qtmultimedia migrated to release pocket in xenial [11:59] Saviq, got an MP with the proper fix for bug 1528668 [11:59] bug 1528668 in qtubuntu (Ubuntu) "[regression] Qt.application.active not working correctly" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1528668 === dandrader is now known as dandrader|afk [13:25] dandrader|afk, state wasn't working either (and actually it does work after the revert) [13:26] I'm inclined to wait for a test suite before merging this again... [13:31] since it doesn't obviously improve anything (as .state still switches between {in,}active) [14:19] jhodapp: ping [14:20] tsdgeos, pong [14:20] jhodapp: i tried the phablet-dev-bootstrap several tiems but it always ends up giving me an error [14:20] jhodapp: how do you want me to proceed with this crash? open a bug? or? === dandrader|afk is now known as dandrader [14:21] tsdgeos, what kind of error and in what part of the process? [14:21] i'll give you a paste [14:21] give me a min [14:21] Saviq, don't what you said [14:22] s/don't/don't get [14:22] tsdgeos, ok [14:26] dandrader, let me start again - the original change that I'm reverting does not improve anything obvious, as Qt.application.state and .active both work without it [14:27] dandrader, seeing as we've failed a lot these last few times between qtmir and qtubuntu, I'm inclined to wait until we have a test suite for qtubuntu to merge this [14:27] Saviq, 1- it updates the state in more situations, making it more accurate (such as when the window gets unfocused) [14:27] yes, I understand [14:27] Saviq, 2- it sets the Suspended state appropriately [14:27] in any case, January, since QA isn't working any more anyway [14:27] Saviq, without it, you would get inactive only when suspended [14:28] dandrader, sure, what I mean is we've been living without it, so we can wait a bit and get it unit-tested, so when we introduce it again we can actually be sure we've not broken anything [14:29] Saviq, so is that how it's going to be for any qtubuntu change from now on? [14:30] dandrader, yes, we need unit tests for all changes there, we've broken it too much recently [14:30] Saviq, not sure it's unit testable [14:31] dandrader, then we need higher level tests for it, something automated [14:32] jhodapp: now is suddenly doing differnent things, i don't understand that command, bear with it until it finishes/fails again :D [14:32] tsdgeos, ok [14:35] dandrader, so yeah, let's focus first in January on getting a plan for testing this [14:35] if it's an autopilot test, so be it === larsu_ is now known as larus === larus is now known as larsu [16:32] hello. Anyone here know how Unity launches the indicator applets? In particular, I want to be able to add the unity indicators to a trayer tray [16:52] Saviq, qtmlr got contaminated with untity7 tags :/ [16:52] qtmir [17:02] dandrader, yeah, long time ago [17:36] tedg, around? [21:09] hello [21:09] is there a way to use SystemComponentes through pygobject or some other python lib? [21:10] mhall119: ^