/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2015/12/24/#lubuntu-devel.txt

adueppenI need some help with reporting a bug. I'm doing some QA for Google Code-in and I was doing the test for installing the alternate amd64 ISO. the installation went successfully and showed no errors, but upon rebooting, I found that xorg and LXDE had not been installed whatsoever. Running `dpkg --get-selections | grep xorg` returns no results.18:31
phillwadueppen: did you run the self test on the iso before booting from it?18:57
phillwadueppen: it seems very broken....19:46
phillwI've reported it to Julien19:49
phillwwxl... "Hi Boss, just had an issue flagged up with the 64bit Alternate ISO... Doesn't boot into GUI and is missing things like startx, scp, man etc. Also apt-get cannot install anything such as apport (so I can use ubuntu-bug)"19:49
adueppenphillw: sorry for the late response, is the self-test checking the MD5? If so, I didn't do that. I tried to run apt and it requested the (non-existent) CDROM.21:53
phillwadueppen: is okay.. i use zsync, it does the self test for me. I can confirm your bugs. But the system is that broken instead of filing a minimal bug report which basically says "It's that broken, I cannot file a bug" I've let Julien (our head of Dev) know directly.21:56
adueppenphillw: OK thanks. Should I put in any bugs for the QA tracker?21:56
phillwI'll retry tomorrow, it could just be a miss match in the repos when the iso was made (they auto make on a cron job) they can be broken one day and working the next.21:57
phillwadueppen: not at present, I can pull files out of the broken VM if Julien needs any more information.21:58
adueppenphillw: I can send my VM state if that would help22:00
phillwadueppen: it's okay. I use guestfish to pull out any files that are requested. It's a handy addition for ISO testing and another reason most testers use KVM instead of vBox :)22:02
phillwI covered it very quickly a few cycles ago (the install command has changed).22:03
adueppenphillw: also I just checked the MD5 and it was fine, so definitely not an issue just us two are having22:04
phillwadueppen: also, there is some further information on the tracker page for using with VM's etc.  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/Overview/Install_Bugs22:04
phillwbut, with ubuntu-bug not there and not able to install apport, there is not a great deal extra we can do at present.22:05
phillwadueppen: "Hi Boss, just had an issue flagged up with the 64bit Alternate ISO... Doesn't boot into GUI and is missing things like startx, scp, man etc. Also apt-get cannot install anything such as apport (so I can use ubuntu-bug)"  In case you missed me posting up what I sent our Head of Dev.22:06
adueppenphillw: yeah I saw that, just wanted to check22:14
phillwadueppen: Julien will reply round about 27th / 28th Which is just in time for the A1 to be tested and approved. It's no big issue if we miss the Alpha 1 for all the IOS's. At this stage, we WANT to find issues :)22:42
adueppenphillq: OK I'll see if the issue happens for the other tests, which it probably will22:42
phillwit may affect the alternates as that uses a different seed to the desktop images22:43
phillwI'll update my 64 bit desktop image and throw it on the VM22:43
phillwhaving desktop and alternate as different build sequences does help lubuntu out at times if one does not play nicely (usually the PPC images).22:46
phillwAd, of course, we have PPC images this cycle22:46
phillwadueppen: can you un-attach bug#1 from http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/351/builds/109239/testcases/1437/results, thanks.22:49
adueppenphillw: it won't let me not attach the bug and still mark it as a failure22:49
phillwadueppen: just leave it as testing in progress, which it currently is as I want to wait for tomorrows re-build of the iso to see if was just the repo out of sync.22:50
adueppenphillw: OK I'll do that22:51
phillwadueppen: you can a comment similar to mine and leave it as test in progress. It will be removed when the automatic rebuild takes place.22:53
adueppenphillw: done22:54
phillwadueppen: I'm going to do the Desktop amd64 iso install.22:54
adueppenphillw: if you have any issues with that, it's probably where it goes to a blank screen instead of telling you to remove the install media and press enter22:55
phillwI'm used to that one... Been a tester sine 10.04, hence my suggesting i let Julien know we had a real odd build (he has done work to have the ISO back CD sized again) and still allow the auto rebuild to occur ij case it is just a daily break.22:58
phillwgrr @ timeout on ubiquity installer!23:03
adueppenphillw: one last question: should I still try the other tests to see if they produce a different result?23:04
phillwyes, but do do them to extent of relaxing on Christmas Eve. Regardless of what failures we find, I'm minded to not raise a manual bug until the respin tomorrow. If that still fails, I will raise a bug manually and include dump files from the VM.23:07
phillw*do not do them to the extent*23:08
adueppenOK23:08
phillwI've got 30 minutes to go before putting the oven for to cook the beef joint over night!23:08
phillwahh, that answered that, it still uses zram :P23:13
phillwadueppen: the desktop ISO machine okay.23:16
adueppenphillw: ?23:18
phillwadueppen: desktop amd 64 image installed and boots up fine23:19
adueppenphillw: oh OK. must be an issue with the alt image(s) then23:19
phillwit would point to that, as I said - Julien has done some serious dieting of the alternate image and may have been a little too harsh in what he removed.23:20
phillwBut, it could equally be a mis match in repos. Julien is pretty careful, so I'm not going to blame him outright!23:21

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!