[03:23] <ljp> well... at least it's not ad spam
[12:24] <cjwatson> mitya57: no need to do manual uploads for s390x bootstrapping - please ask me or Adam Conrad, we can inject staged builds as build-deps
[12:51] <cjwatson> mitya57: (though thanks for the bootstrapping effort!)
[16:49] <mitya57> cjwatson: No problems. Btw are you able to retry autopkgtests by chance?
[16:50] <mitya57> (what I need is http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/t/tracker/xenial/i386/ which is clearly a random failure)
[16:56] <mitya57> cjwatson: Also, what exactly did you mean by "staged builds"? In this tracker/nautilus case there was a circular b-d which I broke by building a nautilus without tracker in a silo, then building tracker against that and copying the binaries.
[17:00] <mitya57> Should I have just pinged you with a link to nautilus silo in this case?
[20:18] <cjwatson> mitya57: Looks like somebody's done the tracker test, but yes, I can do it
[20:19] <mitya57> Yes, I just received the mails about the migration. \o/
[20:19] <cjwatson> mitya57: What we normally do is inject build-dependencies into a bootstrap archive used by LP builds; would've saved the trouble of the tracker upload.  No big deal in this case but it leaves a bit less in the way of debris in the archive
[20:20] <mitya57> Ok, next time I'll know that. Thanks!
[20:20] <mitya57> And btw I committed a fix to the Debian svn for nautilus to build without tracker support on stage1, which should make next bootstrappings easier.
[20:26] <cjwatson> mitya57: Right, we don't currently make use of that automatically, but it's definitely a valuable hint to humans doing the work and it typically speeds things up.