/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2015/12/29/#xubuntu-devel.txt

pleia2do we have apport enabled on stable releases? I always thought we only kept it on in dev02:15
Unit193I believe it's disabled during dev, enabled for release. :P03:51
flocculantUnit193 pleia2 - as far as I know it is disabled on stable and at some point turned on for dev 07:07
bluesabreflocculant: yup, though they turned it on verrrrry late last cycle12:11
bluesabrehttps://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu/xenial/apport/ubuntu/view/head:/debian/changelog12:13
bluesabrehttps://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu/xenial/apport/ubuntu/view/head:/debian/changelog#L17412:13
bluesabre:D12:13
knometrööt12:15
flocculantbluesabre: yep - hence me making sure I have the info for people to do that early before they wake up :)13:14
flocculantpleia2: lol @ yourworshipfulness :p16:57
pleia2:D17:07
Unit193Hrm, really not much going on this cycle.23:02
knomechristmas, new year23:03
flocculantUnit193: did you expect more? 23:06
Unit193flocculant: Not really, due to LTS.  But really there's not been anything much for me to poke at, so that's something.23:33
flocculanthhe23:33
flocculantjust core ... 23:33
Unit193Yeah no, that was done last cycle....23:33
flocculantcertainly seems to have been done with 23:34
flocculantseems like a good enough reason to have a meeting which you run next, to either give up with or push :D23:34
flocculanthate me in the other channel ;)23:35
Unit193Meh, not really much we can do, we've poked them quite a few times and "it's on the todo list"...23:35
flocculantso we should officially give up waiting - I will make sure we have a monthly report 23:41
flocculantI really don't see why 'our' people should think this is our fault23:42
bluesabreit's certainly troublesome23:44
bluesabrehi all23:44
bluesabreand....23:44
bluesabredinner time23:44
bluesabrebbabl23:44
flocculantbluesabre: yea for sure it is, my position is if we're giving up then we should let all know it's not us that's doing so 23:46
flocculantjust basically someone not liking we called it core first23:46
knomeis it really just about the name?23:50
flocculantI think so23:53
knomethink, but are not sure?23:53
flocculantslangasek dressed it up in other stuff for LP23:53
flocculantcall me a cynic23:53
knome(sorry, do not mean to be a prick...)23:53
flocculantofc23:53
knomeyou mean he called it something else?23:53
knomehas anybody asked why?23:53
flocculantneither do I23:53
flocculantadam wondered why we called it core 23:54
knomeright, and?23:54
knomei think it was slangasek who i had this argument over the name with23:54
knomehe proposed a lot of other things, and i told why they aren't as good as core23:55
flocculantshould you call it that? then whatever you want to call it .. then slanglasek came up with another reason, then has studiously ignored it23:55
flocculantadam was in channel not on LP23:55
knomewell i was in channel too23:55
knomei haven't followed the LP side23:55
knomeif you have a link handy...23:55
flocculantanyway - pretty obvious after months they are ignoring it now - so why should we not bring it up in meeting and vote to drop or not - citing canonical ? 23:56
knomedrop what?23:56
flocculantcore for lts23:56
knomewhy should we drop core for lts because somebody isn't content with what we are calling it?23:57
knomeif that is the only aspect that is problematic, that is23:57
flocculantknome: but if we want it on cd.image then we have to at least to try it 23:57
flocculantand quite frankly I have enough to test on day 0 on my own as it is 23:58
knomeif the name is the problem, let's call it "xubuntu humpty dumpty" to get it tested23:58
knomei do acknowledge there are other issues too, but let's make sure a silly name argument doesn't make this fall23:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!