[09:39] <daniellim> hello
[12:17] <Girish> Is Tim Lunn available on IRC?
[14:25] <MatthewAllen> popey, should the "Unity overlay hiding" task not be removed as the bug is set to "Fix Realesed" on Launchpad? http://pad.lv/1075207
[14:33] <fazer> hey, I'm trying to run the messaging-app using qmlscene but I keep getting the error that Ubuntu.* is not installed
[14:34] <fazer> Including Ubuntu.Components, Ubuntu.History, Ubuntu.Telephony
[14:34] <fazer> Does anybody know how I can fix this?
[14:34] <fazer> Nothing I've found on stack overflow or askUbuntu has worked
[14:44] <fazer> Also, can nyone tell me how to open the messaging-app as a project? There isn't a .qmlproject file or any other project file that the ubuntu sdk can open.
[14:46] <ahayzen> fazer, the messaging app has a CMake file that QtC should be able to open http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~phablet-team/messaging-app/trunk/view/head:/src/CMakeLists.txt
[14:47] <ahayzen> fazer, and things like Ubuntu.Components should have come with the SDK, unless you are running 1.2 rather than 1.3 or something ?
[14:47] <fazer> oh ok.
[14:47] <ahayzen> fazer, you may have to manually install cmake from the repos first though IIRC
[14:51] <fazer> I just updated ubuntu-sdk and checked the version, it gives me a whole lot of informtation about qt creator and otherstuff, but doesn't give me a version number. Also, I still get the same error.
[14:51] <ahayzen> fazer, what is the specific error it outputs?
[14:52] <fazer> ahayzen, http://paste.ubuntu.com/14281891/
[14:52] <ahayzen> fazer, ah so Ubuntu.Components is ok?
[14:53] <ahayzen> fazer, you are probably missing the history and telephony from this list http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~phablet-team/messaging-app/trunk/view/head:/debian/control#L5
[14:53] <fazer> for the messaging-app.qml file it seems. But for other files I had attempted to run earlier, Ubuntu.Components wasn't installed. May not have been messaging-app, but I remember gettign the error earlier.
[14:54] <ahayzen> fazer, you may be able to simply run $ sudo apt-get build-dep messaging-app     if the messaging-app is in your repo
[14:54] <fazer> ok, I'll try
[14:55] <ahayzen> fazer, if it doesn't then just manually install the ones listed from lines 5->27
[14:56] <fazer> ahayzen, ok cool. It works now.
[14:56] <fazer> thanks.
[14:56] <ahayzen> \o/
[14:56] <ahayzen> no problem
[15:34] <fazer> ahayzen, what arguments should I use when opening the project using the CMake file?
[15:34] <ahayzen> fazer, what do you mean by arguments?
[15:35] <ahayzen> usually you can just point QtCreator to open the CMakeLists.txt file directly
[15:35] <ahayzen> (that's what I do with the music-app)
[15:35] <fazer> when I try to open the project using the cmake file in qt creator it opens up this cmake wizard asking for arguments and a generator
[15:35] <ahayzen> oh just hit "run"
[15:35] <ahayzen> or "Run CMake" or whatever it is
[15:36] <fazer> if I leave the arguments blank then I get an error.
[15:36] <ahayzen> hmm whats the output
[15:36] <ahayzen> ?
[15:37] <fazer> http://paste.ubuntu.com/14282601/
[15:37] <fazer> This is the log file
[15:38] <ahayzen> fazer, does it tell you which bit is wrong?
[15:38] <fazer> ahayzen, this is what it says in the wizard: http://paste.ubuntu.com/14282622/
[15:39] <fazer> ya it's the qt5_use_modules command and something in the  cmake file
[15:39] <ahayzen> ah
[15:39] <ahayzen> hmm
[15:40] <ahayzen> fazer, i'm not sure about that, you'd probably have to ask one of the messaging-app developers what they do
[15:40] <fazer> ok thanks
[15:41] <ahayzen> fazer, which CMakeLists are you opening?
[15:41] <fazer> the one in the src dir
[15:41] <ahayzen> as there are quite a few, try using the one in the root instead
[15:42] <fazer> ok
[15:42] <fazer> it worked! Thanks
[15:44] <ahayzen> fazer, sweet \o/
[15:47] <fazer> Does anybody know Tiago Salem Herrmann's nickname?
[15:48] <fazer> Is it tiagosh?
[16:54] <Basar> Hi
[16:57] <Basar> I have participated in Google code in 2015 and performed one of the tasks of Ubuntu I.e create new Wallpapers but
[16:58] <Basar> but one of the mentors is either not replying nor reviewing my project Tim Lunn Inoki
[16:58] <Basar> Please Help
[16:59] <MatthewAllen> Basar, how long have you had it submitted? He's probally sleeping
[16:59] <Basar> I has been 8.5 hours
[17:00] <MatthewAllen> Basar, I'd wait atleast 24 - most of the mentors have full time jobs from what I can gather
[17:00] <Basar> So how long I have to wait
[17:01] <Basar> It is taking a lot of time
[17:01] <Basar> and as a student I find it difficult
[17:01] <MatthewAllen> Depends on the person, they've got alot of work to checkout so just be patient, probally won't take more than 24 hours
[17:02] <Basar> You cannot make it fast so I could work on further tasks
[17:02] <Basar> I know he has different time zone
[17:03] <MatthewAllen> There's no reason you can't start another task while you wait
[17:03] <Basar> So,,,,,,,hmmmm OK I wait
[17:03] <Basar> thanks for ur suppor
[17:03] <Basar> #t
[17:04] <MatthewAllen> your welcome, least I can do :)
[17:04] <Basar> thanks
[17:04] <Basar> I will wait for tomorrow
[17:05] <Basar> Can u tell me what time zone Tim sir has
[17:06] <Basar> So can u reply
[17:07] <Basar> ........
[17:07] <MatthewAllen> Basar, no clue
[17:08] <Basar> So how can u say that he must be sleeping
[17:08] <MatthewAllen> Basar, "probally" - that was my guess.
[17:09] <Basar> ok
[17:12] <Basar> OK bye Thanks for ur full support and sorry for inconvenience regretted(if)
[17:13] <Basar> I
[17:49] <mattpdl> Hello, I am installing Ubuntu for my first Google Code-in task. The task states to install the latest LTS or current development branch which will become the next LTS release. Does this mean I can install Ubuntu 15.10 or do I have to install one of the daily development builds?
[17:50] <adueppen> mattpdl: that would mean either 14.04 or Xenial daily
[17:50] <mattpdl> Alright, thank you for your fast response.
[19:26] <tsimonq2> wxl: can you look at the mkusb task? I don't know much about it...
[19:26] <wxl> already on it tsimonq2 thank you!
[19:26] <tsimonq2> wxl: sorry :)
[20:10] <mattpdl> Hi, I am installing Ubuntu for Google Code-in. The description of the task says to "Write a complete description of installation of ubuntu using screenshots and tell us what version of ubuntu you installed and why." I have a couple of questions about this. What is a "complete description," length-wise? Also, what format should I submit it in?
[20:11] <wxl> mattpdl: hello and thanks for your contributions :)
[20:11] <wxl> mattpdl: "complete description" would probably best be described as a step by step. no particular length required, but be detailed
[20:12] <wxl> mattpdl: regarding format, i would suggest an open format like open document format or just text, but this is relatively unimportant as long as we can open it with libreoffice at worst :)
[20:13] <mattpdl> Ok, thank you for your fast response.
[20:13] <wxl> no problem. i'm not a mentor for that particular task, but am familiar with it and can help you out as needed
[23:45] <fazer> Anyone, If a bug can no longer be reproduced should the status be changed to 'Fix Released' or 'Invalid'?
[23:46] <wxl> fazer: i think some people have different philosophies on that. i am of the mind to make it 'incomplete' with a note that more information would be needed
[23:46] <fazer> balloons, will there be anymore autopilot test writing tasks?
[23:47] <wxl> i think 'fix released' sounds more like someone actually went out of their way to fix the bug which may be assuming too much :)
[23:47] <fazer> wxl, what if the specific version of ubuntu is specified? And it cannot be reproduced on the later versions?
[23:47] <wxl> fazer: there'
[23:47] <wxl> oops
[23:47] <wxl> there's still the possibility it might relate to some specific hardware or something. it's still a potentially valid bug
[23:47] <wxl> the nice thing about making them incomplete is that they will expire if no one provides any further info
[23:48] <wxl> fazer: do note that 'invalid' is for non-bugs, like support issues or the like
[23:48] <fazer> ok then. I guess that'll be what I do.
[23:48] <wxl> fazer: i say this as a member of the bug control team, but if you wish to inquire with others on the team for a second opinion, try #ubuntu-bugs
[23:49] <fazer> ok cool. I'll check there too.
[23:49] <ahayzen> fazer, this is also a good reference for bug statuses :-) https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Bug%20statuses
[23:50] <adueppen> wxl: since a bug is only confirmed after 2 people report that it affects them, is the same true for when a bug is no longer reproducible?
[23:50] <adueppen> just wondering
[23:50] <wxl> adueppen: yes
[23:50] <adueppen> wxl: cool