/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2015/12/30/#ubuntu-ops.txt

gavI'm in need of help with an issue related to -offtopic04:05
chuSure.04:26
chugav: How can I help?04:27
gavA user was misbehaving yesterday and they should probably have a ban applied04:28
chuWho?04:28
gavMe04:29
chuI'm not sure I really understand.04:30
gavI posted a spoiler for a movie yesterday after being explicitly told not to do so.04:31
gavThe reactions of certain people made it very clear that my type of spoiler, though I meant it as an innocuous joke, wasn't welcome.04:32
gavSo?04:40
* rww looks04:41
tonyyarussoYou are hereby banned from all movie theaters, DVD rental stores, and streaming services until 2020.04:42
rwwunless you're talking about Han shooting first in Ep IV, I'm not seeing it04:43
gavApproximately 16:44 EST04:43
rww@time EST04:44
ubottuCurrent time in EST: December 29 2015, 23:44:3404:44
rwwo.O04:45
rww< gav>  Snape kills dumbledore04:45
rww?04:45
gavYes04:46
rwwassuming so, that movie's old enough that it doesn't really qualify as a spoiler04:46
rwwplus I'm fairly sure the topic doesn't say Harry Potter spoilers04:46
rwwplus ikonia said the same time you parted (I assume race condition) that you weren't getting banned04:46
gavIt doesn't specify a film, and at least two people expressed displeasure with my conduct04:47
rwwah, true, I thought it did. 1 and 3 still apply04:47
rwwand displeasure != ban04:47
rwwI get displeased about a lot of things that aren't banned, and ops tend to sometimes /express/ displeasure as a "don't do that again" type hint. which again, is not a ban04:48
rwwYou are of course free to exile yourself, but spoilers for a 10 year old story are not against #ubuntu-offtopic guidelines and you won't be getting banned for it.04:49
gavWith all due respect, spoilers for the obvious film implied in the topic aren't explicitly against guidelines (unless there is another copy of the guidelines I haven't seen) and two other users received indefinite bans for that04:50
rww1) there are less than a handful of "indefinite bans" in the core channels04:51
rww2) other people's bans are other people's problem04:51
rww3) the one I banned did so specifically after being told not to do what he did04:52
gavSo did I04:52
gav(Wrt to point 3)04:52
rwwYou are not getting banned for saying "Snape kills Dumbledore", that would be stupid. If you disagree, feel free to not join #ubuntu-offtopic for a length of time you consider appropriate.04:53
rwwIs there anything else we can help you with today?04:53
gavSure, I'd like to appeal that to another op?04:53
rwwWell, I mean, don't all rush in at once.04:56
tonyyarussoWe could op you and let you ban yourself if you want.04:56
gavI'm not in the channel, so that's not likely to work04:56
rwwthere we go. tonyyarusso, have fun, log timestamp is 2015-12-28 21:39 UTC04:57
tonyyarussoDoes it qualify as a spoiler if it's so well-known it's become more of a spoiler meme than a real spoiler?05:00
gavI think what matters more is how it was received05:00
gavIn this case, the answer is clearly badly05:06
gavJust bumping this to prevent it being lost.05:12
chugav: No one is going to take action. This issue has been dealt with. Stop please.05:13
gavI don't understand why I'm being given some kind of preferential treatment here05:14
rwwYou're not, and there's your second op opinion. Anything else we can help you with tonight?05:14
chuYou're not. The fact of the matter is you spoilt a movie released X years ago, not Y weeks ago. There is a massive different.05:15
gavOne person spoils a movie, they get banned. Another does too, and is also banned. I do it, and there's no action05:15
rwwYou spoiled a book from 10 years ago. They spoiled a movie from a couple of weeks ago.05:15
gavI'm sure there are plenty of people in there who haven't seen it05:16
gavOr read it05:16
rwwI don't care, it's 10 years ago. You've gotten two op opinions now, they're not going to change by us going in circles.05:16
chuStatistically, you could say it is likely those who cared about Harry Potter would have seen it already. You can't make the same claim about Star Wars.05:16
chuThere is no argument here, please stop trying to beat the dead horse.05:17
valoriepoor horsie05:17
valorieso dead05:17
bazhangdont spoil it!!!07:49
bazhangtrollng is the new roadmap08:39
ikoniahello azizLIGHT13:40
azizLIGHTHello, last night at 23:59 EST a user from #ubuntu named rw2014 spam pm'd me and possibly other users13:40
azizLIGHTSpam pm was about proselytizing Islam13:40
azizLIGHTHello ikonia13:41
azizLIGHTDid anyone else receive this spam?13:41
ikonianope,13:42
ikoniabut the user has gone13:42
k1l_there were some spam bots removed last night13:42
ikoniaso I wouldn't worry about it13:42
azizLIGHTHm OK13:42
k1l_but thanks for the report13:42
azizLIGHTYeah :)13:42
azizLIGHTSee you in #ubuntu13:43
=== mist is now known as lolcat6
=== lolcat6 is now known as mist
coon_mist is a cunt. Stupid nigger!!!!!15:27
coon_mist is a cunt. Stupid nigger!!!!!15:27
coon_mist is a cunt. Stupid nigger!!!!!15:27
coon_mist is a cunt. Stupid nigger!!!!!15:27
coon_mist is a cunt. Stupid nigger!!!!!15:27
coon_mist is a cunt. Stupid nigger!!!!!15:27
coon_mist is a cunt. Stupid nigger!!!!!15:27
coon_mist is a cunt. Stupid nigger!!!!!15:27
coon_mist is a cunt. Stupid nigger!!!!!15:27
coon_mist is a cunt. Stupid nigger!!!!!15:27
coon_mist is a cunt. Stupid nigger!!!!!15:28
coon_mist is a cunt. Stupid nigger!!!!!15:28
mist\o/15:31
phunyguyfans!15:35
k1l_a windows user having root as ident to troll #debian asks in #ubuntu why he cant troll there17:42
DJonesIt takes allsorts18:03

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!