/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2015/12/30/#ubuntu-quality.txt

=== maclin1 is now known as maclin
=== shuduo_afk is now known as shuduo
=== maclin1 is now known as maclin
tewardtsimonq2: ping19:43
tsimonq2teward: pong, what do you need? :)19:43
tewardtsimonq2: i see a test result for you on the ISO tracker from today, can you test something fairly major and then update your result accordingly?  It's a post-installation observable bug, but it's a big one...19:44
tsimonq2teward: which bug did I miss?19:44
* tsimonq2 thought he looked at all of them...hmm...19:44
tewardwell, it's on the Server test and I know it exists as of two days ago unfixed - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/152929719:44
ubot5Launchpad bug 1529297 in debian-installer (Ubuntu) "[Xenial] 2015-12-25 ISOs (multiple ones) leave 'deb' line for CDROM uncommented after install" [Undecided,Confirmed]19:44
teward^ that's still the case according to Lubuntu which spins their alternate from Server19:44
tewardbasically, after installation, if you boot up, does this remain an issue19:45
tewardi'm zsyncing the ISOs to test now :p19:45
tewardbut if you already did the test... :019:45
tsimonq2teward: I inspected the sources.list and did an apt update, and it worked fine...19:45
tsimonq2teward: I didn't see any issue with the sources.list19:45
tewardtsimonq2: so there is no uncommented cdrom line now?19:45
teward(please pastebin the installed sources.list please)19:46
tsimonq2teward: I don't have it anymore, but I do remember explicitly checking and on the top it had two cdrom entries, one had a speace between the # and the other didn't19:48
tsimonq2teward: if you would like to confirm this, please do19:48
tewardtsimonq2: i'm doing that now, check #lubuntu-devel please19:48
tsimonq2teward: and I am doing other Server installs right now, so I can pastebin the sources.list for one of those when they are one19:48
tsimonq2ok19:49
balloonsAfternoon19:49
tewardballoons: howdy!19:50
balloonshello! Did everyone have some nice Holidays?19:50
tsimonq2balloons: heyyy it's balloons!19:51
balloonshey hey indeed19:55
* teward tsks at tsimonq2 19:55
* tsimonq2 throws his hands in the air19:55
tsimonq2stuff happens!19:55
balloonstsimonq2, yes I was dc'd from IRC for a bit. A little disconnection time is needed every once in a while eh?19:56
balloonsit was mostly happenstance though. My bouncer dc'd and I wasn't around.19:57
tsimonq2balloons: yeah, especially on the holidays :)19:57
tsimonq2balloons: well yeah, teward is tsking at me because my script that I run before QA testing zsyncs the ISOs from the current folder, not pending, and the current folder had the server ISO that was 15 days old! So I completed a test case not knowing this, a bug didn't get reported, and I didn't see it...now I have to redo the test cases now that I adjusted :)19:58
tsimonq2stuff happens :)\19:59
balloonstsimonq2, so your zsync failed or ?20:00
tsimonq2balloons: well current showed the date of the iso:20:01
tsimonq2[   ] xenial-server-amd64.iso.zsync   15-Nov-2015 06:46  1.4M  Server install image for 64-bit PC (AMD64) computers (zsync metafile)20:01
tsimonq2and pending shows:20:01
tsimonq2[   ] xenial-server-amd64.iso.zsync   30-Dec-2015 06:59  1.4M  Server install image for 64-bit PC (AMD64) computers (zsync metafile)20:01
tsimonq2balloons: I had an old ISO20:01
balloonstsimonq2, well technically we test of current, but current not updating for that long is definitely an issue20:02
tsimonq2balloons: that can be addressed? :D :P20:02
balloonsI get why you would want the pending iso (though it should simple fail, assuming things are working correctly)20:02
tsimonq2balloons: and it has worked fine for me in the past...except for when the daily ISO build fails...20:04
tsimonq2and that hasn't happened for this long before20:04
balloonsright, which I'm saying a failing build for that long really is it's own issue20:04
tsimonq2well yeah :)20:05
tewardballoons: in other news: i'm back in the ISO testing world xD20:06
tsimonq2:D20:06
tewardtsimonq2: i bet you'll run into the same issue, with Server or Lubuntu Alt, but yeah... sorry to ping you and question your test case20:07
tsimonq2teward: it's completely fine, *I* screwed up :)20:07
tewardno worries :)20:07
wxlrather your code did, tsimonq220:07
teward:P20:07
wxlyou could check for whether or not the version number is the current date20:08
wxlbut even still that may not give you the most current one20:08
wxle.g. if we get a 20151230 but then rebuild we'll have 20151230.1 and so on20:08
tsimonq2wxl: it was literally a bash script that cd'ed into the directory, then zsynced20:08
wxlOH20:09
wxlcd into current20:09
wxlso current should always be current20:09
wxlperhaps you could check build logs20:09
tsimonq2let me get you a pastebin link20:09
wxli wonder if you can use the lp api to query the status of builds20:10
tewardtsimonq2: any chance you could revise or remove your testresult then for Server?  I know I'm not the Server QA person, but until you have the valid ISO...20:10
tewardi'm sorry, i'm nitpicky20:10
tsimonq2wxl: current version :) http://paste.ubuntu.com/14291493/20:10
tsimonq2teward: getting to that :P :)20:10
tsimonq2balloons: where can I find build logs for the ISOs? I didn't see them on Jenkins, but maybe I am not just looking correctly. :)20:13
wxlyeah don't look on jenkins, tsimonq220:13
wxllook at Lubuntu/Testing#Timing20:13
* tsimonq2 is new to this20:13
balloonstsimonq2, ubuntu-server/daily: Uninstallable packages:  linux-meta-lts-trusty 3.13.0.45.39 produces uninstallable binaries:   * linux-signed-generic-lts-trusty (amd64)   * linux-signed-image-generic-lts-trusty (amd64) ubuntu-server/daily: xenial-server-powerpc.iso oversized by 81137664 bytes (817803264)20:14
tewardhmm, I wonder if the other Server ISOs are affected...20:14
* teward tests i38620:15
tsimonq2oh THAT'S bad, the Kernel can't be installed20:15
tewardouchies20:16
tewarderm20:17
tewardballoons: y no testcases for i386 server?20:17
tewarddid none get created?20:17
tewardin the off chance you know20:17
tewardif not i'll throw stuff in -server :)20:17
tsimonq2ohh wot?20:17
tsimonq2yeah what's up with that?20:17
tewardamd64, testcases: http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/351/builds/109542/testcases    |    i386, no testcases: http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/351/builds/109543/testcases20:18
tsimonq2^20:18
balloonsteward, ohh.. i386 server isn't supposed to be a thing anymore, afaik20:41
balloonswell, at least for ubuntu directly20:42
tewardballoons: ok20:42
balloonswe don't release it20:42
tewardconfused, then, why we have testcases and builds for it20:42
* teward shrugs20:42
balloonsteward, historically we did.20:42
tewardah, OK20:42
balloonsso that product shouldn't be there imho20:43
balloonsI think it went away a couple LTS's ago even20:43
patdk-wkafter 12.04  think20:55
patdk-wkquality got odd, and I got lost, used to be big into testing20:56
patdk-wkor maybe just before 14.0420:56
tewardballoons: who handles spins/respins of ISOs?  And are ISOs ever rebuilt same-day to try and resolve a crit-level post-installer failure in apt sources?21:06
teward(i know the Lubuntu people might respin their alts now that cjwatson uploaded a supposedly-fixed apt-setup, but...)21:06
teward(not sure who handles Server team, nor what the issues/requirements/reasons-not-to are)21:06

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!