[12:17] <cjwatson> infinity: Thanks.
[13:52] <cjwatson> infinity: Maybe force-badtest lxc/1.1.5-0ubuntu3 as well to let apparmor through?  The ppc64el failure is because of a lack of cloud images, I think
[14:23] <cjwatson> infinity: Also please force-badtest nama/1.204-1; for some reason the test system is testing an old version and getting in the way of promoting the version that would help
[17:32] <tsimonq2> cjwatson: I don't know if this would be the correct place to ask this, but why is http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/current/ stuck at December 9th, when we have builds in Pending that are up to today
[17:33] <tsimonq2> cjwatson: hmm, this seems to be where the issue is reported: https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/view/Releases/view/Xenial/job/xenial-desktop-amd64-smoke-default/
[18:21] <cjwatson> tsimonq2: yep, that would be it
[18:21] <cjwatson> pending = raw images off the conveyor belt, current = passed tests
[18:23] <tsimonq2> cjwatson: what tests are failing? how can they be fixed?
[18:24] <cjwatson> I don't know what the problem is
[18:24] <cjwatson> Somebody mentioned that ubiquity is currently broken, but I haven't looked into the details
[18:25] <cjwatson> Not really my field any more
[18:25] <tsimonq2> bug 1527353
[18:26] <cjwatson> maybe just needs to drop privileges for a few more things
[18:26] <tsimonq2> or maybe some privileges need to be elevated
[18:26] <tsimonq2> ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
[19:55] <cjwatson> teward: do you have installer logs for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/1529297 ?
[19:56] <teward> cjwatson: reason to believe it might've resolved, but I can pull them after I run today's ISO image
[19:56] <teward> cjwatson: wish you had asked me a little sooner though - I use the same VM for QA ISO tests each time
[19:56] <cjwatson> well, I don't believe in magical bug resolution, but OK :)
[19:56] <teward> cjwatson: AFAIK it happens in the Lubuntu Alt as well, double check with phillw as well (or hop in #lubuntu-devel where we're all testing this now, they on Lubuntu, myself on server)
[19:57] <teward> they asked me to check the Server ISO since the Lubuntu Alt spins from that I guess
[19:57] <cjwatson> they're separate images with somewhat similar build processes
[19:58] <teward> true, though i can replicate the bug with the 20151230 image too
[19:58] <cjwatson> great, so logs?
[19:58] <teward> where're the logs again :P
[19:58] <cjwatson> /var/log/installer/
[19:58] <teward> cjwatson: sorry, i rarely ISO test :0
[19:58] <wxl> cjwatson: since you're here, any idea why i386/amd64 images aren't building for lubuntu today?
[19:58] <cjwatson> wxl: no
[19:58] <cjwatson> wxl: have you checked logs?
[19:58] <wxl> cjwatson: yes but i need your trained eye to help me decipher :)
[19:59] <teward> cjwatson: need the entire folder?
[19:59] <teward> if so i'll tarball it :)
[19:59] <cjwatson> wxl: oh, I guess they ran into https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/1529428
[19:59] <cjwatson> teward: /var/log/installer/syslog is probably sufficient
[20:00] <teward> cjwatson: http://paste.ubuntu.com/14291112/plain/
[20:00] <teward> used the pastebinit because inside a VM
[20:01] <teward> to do THAT, I had to uncomment the second 'cdrom' deb line which remained uncommented
[20:01] <cjwatson> teward: can you attach it to the bug pleasE?
[20:01] <teward> yep
[20:01] <teward> 1 moment
[20:01] <teward> gotta file a testcase, link the bug, then add it to the bug :)
[20:02] <cjwatson> wxl: kicked a fresh build
[20:02] <cjwatson> wxl: assuming you mean desktop
[20:02] <wxl> oh gee thanks cjwatson
[20:02] <wxl> cjwatson: yep we got alternates
[20:04] <teward> cjwatson: added
[20:05] <cjwatson> teward: thanks
[20:06] <wxl> cjwatson: can you point me at where you saw the bug in the logs? sorry for harassing you but the point is to be able to not have to harass you in the future XD
[20:09] <cjwatson> wxl: relies on a lot of context
[20:10] <wxl> ok good enough for me then cjwatson. thanks for the help as always
[20:10] <cjwatson> wxl: but basically I followed through to the livefs build entries in Launchpad, noticed that they had no build log, and because I'm an LP developer I knew about this pending problem
[20:18] <teward> well that's interesting, a build without a test case :/
[20:18]  * teward shrugs
[20:18] <teward> oops wrong chan
[20:19] <cjwatson> untested because I'm on wireless, but I've uploaded apt-setup which should fix that d-i cdrom problem
[20:19] <teward> cjwatson: so then when the next build runs with the updated apt-setup in it, we shouldn't see this issue?
[20:21] <cjwatson> indeed
[20:21] <cjwatson> hopefully
[20:21] <teward> if it doesn't there'll be more Critical failures on the Server ISO test :p
[20:21] <teward> then I get to report it in the server team meeting that it was an issue xD