[00:29] <wxl> flexiondotorg phillw hopefully pi2 code coming to 4.5 kernel http://www.phoronix.com/forums/forum/linux-graphics-x-org-drivers/x-org-drm/840571-raspberry-pi-2-code-getting-ready-for-upstreaming-in-linux-kernel
[15:25] <phillw> Description:	Ubuntu Xenial Xerus (development branch)
[15:25] <phillw> so far, so good :)
[22:02] <tsimonq2> phillw: although it is archived, just curious as to why http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/351/builds/109720/testcases/1437/results is blank for bugs...
[22:02] <tsimonq2> wxl: ^
[22:04] <phillw> tsimonq2: curious about what?
[22:04] <wxl> weird
[22:04] <wxl> phillw: no "bugs to look out for"
[22:04] <wxl> is that on all the images?
[22:05] <tsimonq2> phillw: you reported no bugs when clearly there were some
[22:06] <phillw> tsimonq2: I reported no bugs because it installed and booted. That is what the test case is about. Adding in application tests are a totally different test case area :)
[22:06] <wxl> maybe because it's archived tsimonq2
[22:06] <tsimonq2> wxl: no, it wouldn;t do that
[22:06] <tsimonq2> phillw: because I have been scolded before by people including you for not including application bugs
[22:06] <wxl> i checked all the daily testcases and they're there
[22:07] <phillw> tsimonq2: e.g. http://packages.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/testcases/1511/revisions/654/info
[22:08] <phillw> tsimonq2: you may like to take some time out to see the new layout of the release notes. It more clearly deliniates between bugs.
[22:08]  * tsimonq2 has seen
[22:08] <phillw> however, you should discuss with wxl and not myself.
[22:08] <wxl> if you guys DO look at one of the daily testcases, you'll see that there's a LIST of bugs now
[22:09] <wxl> i think in general it's not a REQUIREMENT to test every bug, but it's certainly somethind we need to do before release
[22:09] <wxl> well, before a milestone
[22:10] <wxl> cuz i use that list of bugs reported to make the release notes
[22:10]  * wxl was up late sunday with the virtual machine checking each and every single freaking bug reported
[22:10] <tsimonq2> wxl: mind if I subscribe the Lubuntu Packages Team to all of the bugs reported on the Alpha 1 page?
[22:11] <wxl> tsimonq2: sure, feel free
[22:11] <phillw> wxl: I was flagged up a couple of bugs by flexiondotorg, one that he spotted on MATE and another found by Kylin.
[22:12] <wxl> btw i put a new task on gci for doing the packages
[22:12] <phillw> wxl: the packages do need test cases written. I did start before my departure.
[22:12] <wxl> phillw: is that something you would like to take on?
[22:13] <phillw> wxl: not a wise idea :)
[22:14] <wxl> tsimonq2: if you make a list of all the packages in lubuntu that we need test cases for on the packaging tracker, we can make tasks for each one of those
[22:14] <tsimonq2> wxl: I'll do that next
[22:15] <wxl> tsimonq2: i guess we'll have to make separate tasks for each one
[22:15] <tsimonq2> yeah
[22:16] <phillw> tsimonq2: there is a good start at http://packages.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/reports/subscriptions
[22:17] <tsimonq2> I am aware, phillw
[22:20] <tsimonq2> wxl: just Mandatory or Optional?
[22:20] <tsimonq2> Optional as well, that is
[22:21] <wxl> tsimonq2: i guess follow what others do. i would expect that core elements (e.g. lxinput) are more important than others (abiword)
[22:21] <tsimonq2> wxl: well what I am asking is...should I do it?
[22:21] <tsimonq2> I am not wondering about priority
[22:23] <phillw> concentrating on what lx team write and maintain has to be a higher priority than stuff that we use that is maintained by others :)
[22:23] <tsimonq2> phillw: again...not priority
[22:25] <phillw> applications that are fundamental are mandatory... e,g, if pcmanfm does not work, that is a critical bug. If Abiword has a problem with foreign languages, that is irritating and also out of our control, so will never be a critical bug.
[22:26]  * tsimonq2 sighs and just makes a list of all of them
[23:58] <wxl> tsimonq2: you get that list?