[01:17] marcoceppi, ok cool [09:55] gnuoy, thanks for those +1's and merges [09:55] poking those test failures for swift-*, glance and keystone now [09:55] kk [13:02] gnuoy, beisner, https://code.launchpad.net/~james-page/charm-helpers/systemd-support/+merge/281742 [13:02] I'll raise a temp merge for glance with that branch synced [13:02] to test it out [13:02] like [13:02] no I won't - I just did that locally and its good [13:06] gnuoy, beisner: and https://code.launchpad.net/~james-page/charm-helpers/haproxy-stats-1.6/+merge/281747 [13:07] for mitaka support [15:02] @mbruzek: Hi, I got a comment for was base to include a reverse proxy to exercise the website relationship. But was base does not support clustering and it is a standalone. Does it make sense to include reverse proxy for stand alone was base? [15:05] Geetha: even if it doesn't support clustering, you may still want to expose the endpoint elsewhere in your environments [15:06] Hello Geetha. Are you certain it does not support clustering? I thought all Webpshere products could cluster? [15:06] especially when we land cross environment relationships. I can see having a DMZ environment to expose load balancers, and running the apps in another environment. This isn't as distant future as you might think :) [15:08] Websphere ND does support clustering. And I confirmed with product team that Websphere base product does not support clustering. [15:10] Geetha: If that is true (and I believe you) I would look for other opportunities for relations, such as a relation to DB2 or _something_ to relate to. A charm that does not relate to anything is not very useful all by itself. [15:11] Geetha: So my comment was meant to say that a charm with zero relations is not very useful, but if you could find any other relations (I listed a few without knowing that information) then we should implement those [15:17] ok, I will try to find other possible relations that could implement with websphere base product. [15:47] how do I configure juju to bootstrap an environment through a socks proxy [20:34] coreycb, hey - just looking at your aodh changes for ceilometer charm [20:34] coreycb, do we need to start generating some aodh config files? [20:37] jamespage, yeah it looks like at least aodh.conf [20:37] jamespage, tests are failing on that mp btw and I've not looked into them yet [21:05] if there is anyone around with the right memberships, I need a review on: [21:05] https://code.launchpad.net/~james-page/charm-helpers/systemd-support/+merge/281742 [21:05] and [21:05] https://code.launchpad.net/~james-page/charm-helpers/haproxy-stats-1.6/+merge/281747 [21:32] coreycb, re-triggered your ceilo amulet test (looked like an undercloud instance issue). looks like a lil lint cleanup to do on the unit tests while that cooks ;-) [21:32] beisner, ah thanks! [21:36] yw! [21:48] jamespage, there's a patch in python-keystoneauth1 that's not yet been uploaded to debian (we have it in ubuntu), so that should fix it if you wouldn't mind uploading python-keystoneauth1 first [21:50] wrong channel