/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2016/01/06/#ubuntu-ci-eng.txt

cjwatsonalesage,bzoltan_: I think that https://code.launchpad.net/~cjwatson/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/src_test-depends/+merge/281713 should fix the powerpc build problems (and as mentioned in the MP it doesn't seem to be anything very specific to powerpc, just a parallel-build problem with sufficient CPUs, so worth fixing in any case)01:37
alesagecjwatson, ack, will make a note on our trello for EU AM01:57
bzoltan_cjwatson: Thanks for the MR. I thought that it must be a parallel-build issue.03:06
bzoltan_alesage:  I have manually merged this fix to the lnding branch and let the MR automerge to the staging branch. The build will be ready soon too.03:07
bzoltan_cjwatson: alesage: all good in silo https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/landing-056 Thank you again for the fix.03:50
=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun
=== _salem is now known as salem_
cjwatsonbzoltan_: yay10:47
=== chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk
=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun
jibeltrainguards: sil2100 being off today, anyone would know why there is no phone build today? the rootfs build successfully apparently but there is no new image in rc-proposed.12:44
cjwatsonmaybe something to do with the i386 rootfs failing to build?12:46
cjwatsonhttps://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/vivid/ubuntu-touch/+build/4800412:46
jibelmaybe, and it could be related to this unsatisfiable depends https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/static/britney/vivid/landing-058/excuses.html13:01
jibelconfirmed it's the problem13:08
=== ubot5` is now known as ubot5
=== chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk
alesagetvoss, seeing "needs rebuild" but not sure if this is due to sweeny's branch special status https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/73116:13
tvossalesage, hmmm, let me see16:14
tvossalesage, might actually be required ... checking16:14
tvossyup, kicked16:15
tvossalesage, my apologies :/16:15
alesagetvoss, ack, nw, quick review forthcoming16:15
mvo_trainguards - the image importer appears to be disabled, is there a reaon for this? we need to import a new snappy image16:15
kenvandinemvo_, i'm filling in for robru today, i know nothing about that though16:17
kenvandinesil2100, oh you're still around... ^^ ?16:17
mvo_kenvandine: if sil2100 is not around it would be great if someone could telegram him for a quick yes/no if I can run image imports, its unfortunately important and urgent (not OMG urgent, but I would like to get updated images before my EOD so that the next team can take over and work with them)16:19
kenvandinei'm sure sil2100 is still around, if he doesn't reply soon i'll find someone that has him on telegram16:21
sil2100mvo_: it's good to enable it16:21
sil2100I was doing some quick image copies earlier16:21
pmcgowansil2100, did we not do an auto build last night?16:22
sil2100mvo_: sorry about that!16:22
mvo_sil2100: no problem, thanks16:23
mvo_sil2100: I reanbled them now16:23
sil2100mvo_: thanks!16:23
sil2100pmcgowan: we did, but we also had a i386 build failure... but we should get the armhf image imported now anyway16:24
pmcgowanok16:24
sil2100seb128: hey! Another binNEW review required! https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/818 <- here, they add a new package called libubuntugestures5-private-dev16:26
sil2100seb128: if you would have a moment of time in the nearest days we would be grateful :)16:26
sil2100seb128: the packaging diff: https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-056-2-publish/2/artifact/ubuntu-ui-toolkit_xenial_packaging_changes.diff16:26
seb128sil2100, hey, ok, I can have a look16:26
Mirvsil2100: btw I got PPU rights for UITK among else now :)16:26
sil2100kenvandine: this silo needs a +1 from the archive team ^16:26
sil2100Mirv: \o/ yaay :)16:27
kenvandinesil2100, ok16:27
sil2100Mirv: since you're around for a moment, do you remember how we're supposed to force a silo publish when the silo has 'bad status'? (like, FTBFS for an arch we don't care about etc.)16:37
Mirvsil2100: I think there's no force publish option nowadays, the only option is manual copy16:41
Mirvso I guess there's no such thing as an arch we don't care about :)16:41
MirvI kind of meant not to be around, but I noticed I can push the Jenkins agenda forward so pushing a couple of buttons :)16:42
kenvandinesil2100, something's up with silo 1516:42
kenvandineit's been published and merged since monday16:42
kenvandineit had an error and hadn't freed the silo yet16:43
kenvandineso i tried to abandon it16:43
kenvandinenow the status is abandoned, but it still has the assigned silo?16:43
kenvandinesil2100, it did delete the packages in the ppa16:43
kenvandinebut it looks to me like the silo is still assigned, so maybe the ppa is being held?16:44
sil2100hmmm16:47
sil2100kenvandine: where do you see the silo still is assigned?16:48
kenvandinethe ppa description still lists settings16:48
kenvandinei thought that stuff got flushed out16:48
kenvandineand16:48
kenvandineName of Assigned Siloubuntu/landing-01516:48
kenvandinewhich might not mean anything16:49
kenvandinebut the status had been set to "Uncaught exception"16:49
kenvandinebefore i abandoned it16:49
kenvandinehttps://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/82116:49
bzoltan_sil2100:  would you please publish the silo56? It will need a jedi's ack.. because it has debian space change... including one from kenvandine16:59
sil2100kenvandine: the PPA description is not cleared on silo clearing17:00
sil2100bzoltan_: yeah, I poked seb128 about that already :)17:00
sil2100bzoltan_: since we need a binNEW approval17:00
bzoltan_sil2100:  super! Thank you and thank to seb12817:00
sil2100kenvandine: so I *think* the silo is freed already17:01
kenvandinesil2100, good, thanks17:05
seb128sil2100, bzoltan_, looks fine for binNEW17:10
cjwatsonperl 5.22 landing in xenial17:17
cjwatsonbig transition, 593 source packages.  hopefully will be a non-event for touch but just in case17:18
sil2100seb128: thanks! :)17:22
sil2100bzoltan_: published o/17:23
bzoltan_sil2100:  Cool!17:23
sil2100kenvandine: ok, I go back offline now, if you could keep a look out on the publishable page I would be grateful :)17:23
sil2100o/17:23
alex_abreusil2100, I have an issue w/ https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/759, it tries to build for packages that were removed, ... the source package names initially were 'webbrowser-app webapps-demo' but now should only be webbrowser-app, but it still fails to build & re-add webapps-demo for every triggered build17:26
=== alan_g is now known as alan_g|EOD
alex_abreurobru, ping18:44
robrualex_abreu: I'm off today can you try kenvandine ?18:45
robrualex_abreu: you need to remove the source package names from the ticket18:46
robruAnd the ppa18:46
alex_abreurobru, kenvandine well I did ...18:49
alex_abreubut everytime I rebuild I readds them18:49
kenvandinedid you delete them from the ppa?18:50
alex_abreuah not from ppa18:50
robrualex_abreu: yeah it re-adds based on the ppa18:50
robrualex_abreu: also is this a source package rename?18:50
alex_abreurobru, not a rename, only a removal of one of the source package from the list18:51
robrualex_abreu: OK, should work if deleted from PPA then. kenvandine will have to do that18:51
alex_abreuok thx18:52
alex_abreukenvandine, could you remove the webapps-demo source package from the ppa?19:36
alex_abreukenvandine, in https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/landing-01419:36
kenvandinealex_abreu, sure19:37
kenvandinealex_abreu, done19:38
alex_abreukenvandine, thx !19:38
kenvandinenp19:38
=== salem_ is now known as _salem

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!