| === maclin1 is now known as maclin | ||
| === ubot5` is now known as ubot5 | ||
| lotuspsychje | !latest | 14:40 |
|---|---|---|
| ubot5 | Packages in Ubuntu may not be the latest. Ubuntu aims for stability, so "latest" may not be a good idea. Post-release updates are only considered if they are fixes for security vulnerabilities, high impact bug fixes, or unintrusive bug fixes with substantial benefit. See also !backports, !sru, and !ppa. | 14:40 |
| lotuspsychje | any triggers for latest packages here? | 14:40 |
| LocutusOfBorg1 | lotuspsychje, which package? | 14:58 |
| lotuspsychje | LocutusOfBorg1: we were looking for libsdl 2.0.4 before | 14:59 |
| LocutusOfBorg1 | oh, what a coincidence | 15:00 |
| LocutusOfBorg1 | http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-sdl-maintainers/2016-January/002272.html | 15:00 |
| LocutusOfBorg1 | it should be fixed in debian before | 15:01 |
| lotuspsychje | mcphail: ^ | 15:01 |
| LocutusOfBorg1 | actually I did the work http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-sdl/packages/libsdl2.git | 15:01 |
| LocutusOfBorg1 | there is still two points to address, I hope my fellow Debian Maintainers will address them | 15:01 |
| mcphail | LocutusOfBorg1: lotuspsychje: does this mean 2.0.4 is likely to come to xenial? 2.0.2 doesn't work with Mir properly | 15:03 |
| LocutusOfBorg1 | you can ping the other sdl maintainers on the mail I sent | 15:04 |
| LocutusOfBorg1 | maybe this can speed up things | 15:04 |
| LocutusOfBorg1 | I, for sure, won't upload it because just I have permissions, it needs a transition probably | 15:04 |
| LocutusOfBorg1 | and changes are quite large | 15:05 |
| mcphail | LocutusOfBorg1: thanks. I'll keep poking. need to find out if all bschaefer's mir fixes have made it into upstream anyway | 15:06 |
| mcphail | Would be a shame if a functional SDL missed LTS release | 15:07 |
| LocutusOfBorg1 | mcphail, the transition is quite large, so it needs to start ASAP | 15:08 |
| LocutusOfBorg1 | mcphail, it isn't Debian or Ubuntu fault if upstream took 2 years to release 2.0.4 :) | 15:09 |
| lotuspsychje | LocutusOfBorg1: isnt there like a request url for packages? | 15:09 |
| LocutusOfBorg1 | lotuspsychje, what does it mean? | 15:09 |
| mcphail | LocutusOfBorg1: ha! | 15:09 |
| LocutusOfBorg1 | no, there is a mail list, just ping it | 15:09 |
| lotuspsychje | LocutusOfBorg1: well like mcphail here suggest sdl to be added | 15:09 |
| LocutusOfBorg1 | I imported on git as soon as it has been released (a few hours later) | 15:10 |
| LocutusOfBorg1 | now I need to have someone on pkg-sdl team to upload | 15:10 |
| * LocutusOfBorg1 can upload it, but it needs coordination from -release team | 15:10 | |
| lotuspsychje | LocutusOfBorg1: so if someone wants a package added==mailinglist mail?. | 15:10 |
| LocutusOfBorg1 | there is already a debian open bug | 15:12 |
| LocutusOfBorg1 | https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=788688 | 15:12 |
| ubot5 | Debian bug 788688 in libsdl2 "Please update to 2.0.3" [Wishlist,Open] | 15:12 |
| cjwatson | LocutusOfBorg1: please don't start an SDL transition until perl 5.22 is out of the way | 15:31 |
| cjwatson | oh autopkgtest, y u take forever | 15:32 |
| LocutusOfBorg1 | cjwatson, it won't start for at least a week, and according to what you said on -devel the perl should be done in a few hours :) | 16:03 |
| cjwatson | LocutusOfBorg1: I'm certainly hoping so | 16:03 |
| LocutusOfBorg1 | I hope with you :) | 16:09 |
| LocutusOfBorg1 | BTW how can I help in vpx transition? it should be already started, and preventing virtualbox from migrate | 16:09 |
| LocutusOfBorg1 | do you have any single command for issuing rebuilds? I would like to avoid dget dch dpkg-buildpackage dput | 16:10 |
| cjwatson | it'll be a lot less impossible to see what's going on with libvpx (and mostly everything else) once perl lands | 16:18 |
| LocutusOfBorg1 | yes, of course | 16:18 |
| LocutusOfBorg1 | I'm finding difficult to understand the log too | 16:18 |
| cjwatson | http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2015/12/22/%23ubuntu-release.html#t14:10 | 16:19 |
| LocutusOfBorg1 | btw can somebody please accept hedgewars/*-backports? | 16:19 |
| cjwatson | rebuild stuff | 16:19 |
| LocutusOfBorg1 | yes, I remember that log, but I don't keep logs on my pc, thanks | 16:19 |
| cjwatson | you might have noticed that at the time but you were busy nitpicking about binNMUs ;-) | 16:19 |
| LocutusOfBorg1 | the problem is that I don't know an easy way to keep logs and find them ;) | 16:20 |
| cjwatson | dunno how to do it in hexchat. I configured irssi autolog years ago ... | 16:21 |
| cjwatson | I also have http://paste.ubuntu.com/14421429/ as ~/bin/grep-ubuntu-irclogs, which is slow but functional in cases where it's for a channel I'm not routinely in | 16:22 |
| cjwatson | (also makes quite a lot of requests ...) | 16:22 |
| LocutusOfBorg1 | lol wonderful! | 16:23 |
| LocutusOfBorg1 | cjwatson, http://paste.ubuntu.com/14422449/ | 17:57 |
| LocutusOfBorg1 | what do you think about? | 17:57 |
| LocutusOfBorg1 | it should avoid the "codename release" issue, and avoid to hardcode the reason for the rebuild | 17:58 |
| LocutusOfBorg1 | I think I'll use this one | 17:58 |
| xnox | cjwatson, well done =) | 18:02 |
| xnox | i see perl migrating. | 18:02 |
| === henrix_ is now known as henrix | ||
| mapreri | LocutusOfBorg1: dch -R 'Rebuild for new '$2'.' | 19:54 |
| mapreri | sed s/UNRELEASED/$RELEASE/ -i debian/changelog | 19:54 |
| mapreri | use `dch -D` instead of the sedding? | 19:54 |
| slangasek | arges: hi, so I wonder about the self-accept etc. on bug #1513227, given that bug #1511347 was filed first :) | 20:27 |
| ubot5 | bug 1513227 in systemtap (Ubuntu Trusty) "systemtap ppc64el needs to build for trusty" [Medium,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1513227 | 20:27 |
| ubot5 | bug 1511347 in systemtap (Ubuntu Trusty) "Feature request to enable systemtap on ubuntu 14.04.04." [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1511347 | 20:27 |
| slangasek | arges: also seems to include changes (multi-arch) with no SRU bug or justification... | 20:41 |
| slangasek | ah, I guess that piece goes hand-in-hand with the Architecture change | 20:44 |
| LocutusOfBorg1 | mapreri, seems legit | 20:52 |
| arges | slangasek: the multi-arch change should have been explained better in the previous bug. So will including the patches from ibm fix it for ppc64el? | 21:20 |
| slangasek | arges: that's my understanding, yes | 21:21 |
| slangasek | arges: I'd assigned the bug to me, I'm happy to follow through with a 1.3 upload; or do you want to do it? | 21:21 |
| arges | slangasek: I won't get to it today, so if you have time go ahead. otherwise i can put on my list for later this week | 21:22 |
| slangasek | arges: ok I'll probably do it this afternoon then | 21:22 |
| LocutusOfBorg1 | mapreri, http://paste.ubuntu.com/14424960/ | 22:50 |
| LocutusOfBorg1 | :) | 22:50 |
| cjwatson | LocutusOfBorg1: I'm not taking patches to my ad-hoc stuff; if you want to run something a bit different then be my guest | 23:53 |
| cjwatson | LocutusOfBorg1: but you don't need to tell me about it, nor do I really want to know :) | 23:54 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!