=== maclin1 is now known as maclin === ubot5` is now known as ubot5 [14:40] !latest [14:40] Packages in Ubuntu may not be the latest. Ubuntu aims for stability, so "latest" may not be a good idea. Post-release updates are only considered if they are fixes for security vulnerabilities, high impact bug fixes, or unintrusive bug fixes with substantial benefit. See also !backports, !sru, and !ppa. [14:40] any triggers for latest packages here? [14:58] lotuspsychje, which package? [14:59] LocutusOfBorg1: we were looking for libsdl 2.0.4 before [15:00] oh, what a coincidence [15:00] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-sdl-maintainers/2016-January/002272.html [15:01] it should be fixed in debian before [15:01] mcphail: ^ [15:01] actually I did the work http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-sdl/packages/libsdl2.git [15:01] there is still two points to address, I hope my fellow Debian Maintainers will address them [15:03] LocutusOfBorg1: lotuspsychje: does this mean 2.0.4 is likely to come to xenial? 2.0.2 doesn't work with Mir properly [15:04] you can ping the other sdl maintainers on the mail I sent [15:04] maybe this can speed up things [15:04] I, for sure, won't upload it because just I have permissions, it needs a transition probably [15:05] and changes are quite large [15:06] LocutusOfBorg1: thanks. I'll keep poking. need to find out if all bschaefer's mir fixes have made it into upstream anyway [15:07] Would be a shame if a functional SDL missed LTS release [15:08] mcphail, the transition is quite large, so it needs to start ASAP [15:09] mcphail, it isn't Debian or Ubuntu fault if upstream took 2 years to release 2.0.4 :) [15:09] LocutusOfBorg1: isnt there like a request url for packages? [15:09] lotuspsychje, what does it mean? [15:09] LocutusOfBorg1: ha! [15:09] no, there is a mail list, just ping it [15:09] LocutusOfBorg1: well like mcphail here suggest sdl to be added [15:10] I imported on git as soon as it has been released (a few hours later) [15:10] now I need to have someone on pkg-sdl team to upload [15:10] * LocutusOfBorg1 can upload it, but it needs coordination from -release team [15:10] LocutusOfBorg1: so if someone wants a package added==mailinglist mail?. [15:12] there is already a debian open bug [15:12] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=788688 [15:12] Debian bug 788688 in libsdl2 "Please update to 2.0.3" [Wishlist,Open] [15:31] LocutusOfBorg1: please don't start an SDL transition until perl 5.22 is out of the way [15:32] oh autopkgtest, y u take forever [16:03] cjwatson, it won't start for at least a week, and according to what you said on -devel the perl should be done in a few hours :) [16:03] LocutusOfBorg1: I'm certainly hoping so [16:09] I hope with you :) [16:09] BTW how can I help in vpx transition? it should be already started, and preventing virtualbox from migrate [16:10] do you have any single command for issuing rebuilds? I would like to avoid dget dch dpkg-buildpackage dput [16:18] it'll be a lot less impossible to see what's going on with libvpx (and mostly everything else) once perl lands [16:18] yes, of course [16:18] I'm finding difficult to understand the log too [16:19] http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2015/12/22/%23ubuntu-release.html#t14:10 [16:19] btw can somebody please accept hedgewars/*-backports? [16:19] rebuild stuff [16:19] yes, I remember that log, but I don't keep logs on my pc, thanks [16:19] you might have noticed that at the time but you were busy nitpicking about binNMUs ;-) [16:20] the problem is that I don't know an easy way to keep logs and find them ;) [16:21] dunno how to do it in hexchat. I configured irssi autolog years ago ... [16:22] I also have http://paste.ubuntu.com/14421429/ as ~/bin/grep-ubuntu-irclogs, which is slow but functional in cases where it's for a channel I'm not routinely in [16:22] (also makes quite a lot of requests ...) [16:23] lol wonderful! [17:57] cjwatson, http://paste.ubuntu.com/14422449/ [17:57] what do you think about? [17:58] it should avoid the "codename release" issue, and avoid to hardcode the reason for the rebuild [17:58] I think I'll use this one [18:02] cjwatson, well done =) [18:02] i see perl migrating. === henrix_ is now known as henrix [19:54] LocutusOfBorg1: dch -R 'Rebuild for new '$2'.' [19:54] sed s/UNRELEASED/$RELEASE/ -i debian/changelog [19:54] use `dch -D` instead of the sedding? [20:27] arges: hi, so I wonder about the self-accept etc. on bug #1513227, given that bug #1511347 was filed first :) [20:27] bug 1513227 in systemtap (Ubuntu Trusty) "systemtap ppc64el needs to build for trusty" [Medium,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1513227 [20:27] bug 1511347 in systemtap (Ubuntu Trusty) "Feature request to enable systemtap on ubuntu 14.04.04." [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1511347 [20:41] arges: also seems to include changes (multi-arch) with no SRU bug or justification... [20:44] ah, I guess that piece goes hand-in-hand with the Architecture change [20:52] mapreri, seems legit [21:20] slangasek: the multi-arch change should have been explained better in the previous bug. So will including the patches from ibm fix it for ppc64el? [21:21] arges: that's my understanding, yes [21:21] arges: I'd assigned the bug to me, I'm happy to follow through with a 1.3 upload; or do you want to do it? [21:22] slangasek: I won't get to it today, so if you have time go ahead. otherwise i can put on my list for later this week [21:22] arges: ok I'll probably do it this afternoon then [22:50] mapreri, http://paste.ubuntu.com/14424960/ [22:50] :) [23:53] LocutusOfBorg1: I'm not taking patches to my ad-hoc stuff; if you want to run something a bit different then be my guest [23:54] LocutusOfBorg1: but you don't need to tell me about it, nor do I really want to know :)