[11:49] <dholbach> davidcalle, mhall119: I'm wondering if I should make the markdown importer a separate app in dev.u.c... what do you think?
[11:49] <dholbach> it looks rather self-contained
[11:49] <dholbach> and it'd make the code easier to find :)
[11:53] <dholbach> I think I'll just do it
[12:30] <dholbach> davidcalle: I updated https://code.launchpad.net/~dholbach/developer-ubuntu-com/django-cms-update/+merge/278447 again
[12:32] <dholbach> ho hum...
[12:32] <dholbach> not sure where the conflicts come from now
[12:32] <dholbach> maybe I should propose it again your 1.8 branch
[12:35] <dholbach> ok, done: https://code.launchpad.net/~dholbach/developer-ubuntu-com/django-cms-update/+merge/281743
[14:06] <davidcalle> dholbach: I'm confused, wasn't the cms-update branch already merged in the django-1.8-cms-2.3 one?
[14:06] <dholbach> davidcalle: there's some new updates again :)
[14:07] <davidcalle> dholbach: ah :)
[14:08] <dholbach> if we manage to do one update in 2-3 years we can update to the newest that's reasonable ;-)
[14:08] <davidcalle> dholbach: :D
[14:09] <davidcalle> dholbach: I'm reviewing the new changes since last time we looked at it together before the holidays. After that is it ok with you to merge it in the 1.8 branch?
[14:10] <dholbach> sure
[14:19]  * davidcalle is updating-pip-cache
[14:22] <davidcalle> dholbach: I've started working on getting the mojo spec to deploy locally!
[14:22] <dholbach> wow
[14:22] <dholbach> is it hard to get it set up locally?
[14:25] <davidcalle> dholbach: it's a bit obscure and creates a bunch of alien stuff in /srv , but I've got some tips in #webops and now I need to strip down everything that doesn't makes sense locally (eg. credentials to nagios, etc)
[14:26] <davidcalle> dholbach, the documentation is alright, so that was pretty painless to setup
[14:26] <dholbach> nice
[14:26] <dholbach> that's at least some good news :)
[15:04] <davidcalle> dholbach: http://paste.ubuntu.com/14420747/
[15:11] <davidcalle> dholbach: on a related note, I really like how this test is done
[15:14] <davidcalle> dholbach: also, if I print the content of the article generated by the test, it contains a link
[15:17] <dholbach> davidcalle: wow... :)
[15:17] <dholbach> ok, I'll take a look
[15:29] <dholbach> davidcalle: can you pull and run the test again?
[15:36] <davidcalle> dholbach: AssertionError: Link /en/file2/ not found
[15:36] <dholbach> hum
[15:37] <dholbach> c'est bizarre ça
[15:38] <davidcalle> dholbach: the test passes if I do : res = c.get(link.attrs['href'].replace('en/', '')
[15:38] <dholbach> the test passes here :)
[15:39] <dholbach> anyway, I'll take a look at it
[15:40] <dholbach> maybe add something like this?
[15:40] <dholbach>             logging.error('Available pages are: {}'.format(
[15:40] <dholbach>                 ', '.join([a.get_absolute_url() for a in Page.objects.all()])
[15:40] <dholbach>             ))
[15:40] <dholbach> and
[15:40] <dholbach> from cms.models import Page
[15:40] <dholbach> just so it can tell you which pages are actually available
[15:48] <davidcalle> dholbach: /en/file2/ is here, hum
[15:49] <dholbach> davidcalle: I'm just about to move the tests to local test data and I'm experiencing a similar problem - let me see if I can write a better test and make the code more explicit about what it does