[08:20] <dholbach> good morning
[09:20] <dpm> morning dholbach, davidcalle
[09:20] <dholbach> hola dpm
[09:20] <dpm> hey :)
[09:21] <dpm> davidcalle, what's the status of deployments of d.u.c?
[09:22] <davidcalle> dpm, hello, we are planning the new django for next week max, with a few fixes as well (eg. transations dashboard)
[09:23] <davidcalle> dpm, I've started working local deployments with help from IS (in a nutshell: mojo in lxc)
[09:23] <dpm> yeah, I remember you mentioned that last bit yesterday
[09:39] <davidcalle> dholbach: ping me when you need me to retry the failing test from yesterday, or if you need a hand with it
[09:42] <dholbach> davidcalle: will do
[15:34] <dholbach> davidcalle: this is a bit weird: http://paste.ubuntu.com/14430631/ - it might be a new Django default or something
[15:34] <dholbach> I'll make sure the tests match the reality
[15:46] <davidcalle> dholbach: the None language or am I missing something else?
[15:46] <dholbach> yeah
[15:47]  * davidcalle tries to reproduce
[16:14] <dholbach> ok, I think I'm getting somewhere
[16:17] <davidcalle> dholbach: same result for me (None)
[16:18] <dholbach> ok, thanks
[16:19] <dholbach> I have a bigger change coming up where I use local checkouts for testing which should speed up the tests - that together with update to a newer django seems to have shaken up a few things
[16:19] <dholbach> a good opportunity to make the code (and the tests) more explict
[16:20] <davidcalle> dholbach: local checkouts in the sense that the project will ship bzr and git branches in the tests/data folder?
[16:20] <dholbach> more like a export of just the docs within the git branch
[16:21] <dholbach> just so we have local data we can test with
[16:21] <dholbach> it's 200k in total if increased size is a concern
[16:22] <davidcalle> dholbach: it's not, afaik :)
[16:24] <dholbach> it would also provide a way to test and guard against things like 1531200 :)