[10:16] Hi, are there any 4.4 Ubuntu kernels for xenial somewhere for testing? I'm seeing a regression from ubuntu-xenial-4.3 and upstream-vanilla-4.4 and I'd like to see if the ubuntu-ified 4.4 is affected or not. [10:17] (I e, our 4.3 works, upstream's 4.4 does not) [10:17] diwic, yes in ppa:canonical-kernel-team/ubuntu/unstable ... [10:18] though i think we know it has a number of issues still, cking was tracking at least two [10:19] issues such as "you're computer will catch fire" or such as "if you have ppc64el, once in a million, it will consume 2% more power" ? [10:19] s/you're/your [10:19] apw, i e, should I try it or not :-) [10:19] apw, yep, there an issse introduced after 4.4-rc6 that causes grub-install to break, commit d3805611130af9b9 ("Split bios on chunk boundaries) [10:19] "makes grub2 explode in your face sometimes" ... [10:20] that sounds bad enough, thanks [10:20] diwic, but that is in mainline too [10:20] apparent a fix for this is coming "real soon" [10:20] cking, was there anohter one, or was that the intel idle performance stat thing ? [10:20] (that isn [10:20] (that isn't an issue at all in fact) [10:21] apw, that was actually a fix to intel_pstate that actually is fine as it was shown to save ~1+ watts on a test scenario where it looked like the CPU was being exercised more because it was just in a lower p state [10:21] ok so only one real issue remaining [10:22] one real issue that we are aware of ;-) [10:22] fwiw, it's my touchpad that stopped working on 4.3 -> 4.4 [10:25] apw: FYI, just found created LP: #1532146, I should have a fix handy soon [10:25] Launchpad bug 1532146 in initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) "update-initramfs fails for MODULES=dep when root is on nvme device" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1532146 [10:25] apw: I'll also forward to debian which has the same issue [10:32] diwic, i guess wait until the next release and if it still plays up, file a bug and get jsalisbury to help you bisect it [10:32] s/next release/next kernel/ [10:33] cking, you mean next kernel in the unstable ppa? [10:34] diwic, well, the next one in the unstable ppa that fixes the grub-install bug :-/ [10:35] * cking has no idea when that will be, sorry [10:35] caribou, ok ta, i have another fix i need to get into initramfs-tools pretty soon too, so if you get me the fix i'll wrap those two up together [10:36] apw: sure, I should have the debdiff attached to the case in a few minutes [10:36] cking, ok :-) I suppose that we can't just revert the patch for the time being? [10:36] apw: I ran into this because yet another case of OOM panic during a kernel crash dump on trusty [10:37] apw: initramfs was again too big [10:37] apw: I'm soo happy I fixed this problem in Xenial [10:37] cking, well, if it doesn't ends up getting fixed soon anyhow [10:38] caribou, yeah, that was a good bit of work to be proud of === ddstreet_away is now known as ddstreet [13:26] apw: debdiff for LP: #1532146 is in the bug [13:26] Launchpad bug 1532146 in initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) "update-initramfs fails for MODULES=dep when root is on nvme device" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1532146 [13:33] apw: FYI, https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=785147 claims to fix this for Debian but it is in Experimental & not in Sid. [13:33] Debian bug 785147 in initramfs-tools "initramfs-tools: NVMe boot drives not supported" [Important,Fixed] [13:36] i can even test that... [13:36] cause i've been failing to install on to my nvme laptop for weeks now. [13:37] caribou, we will want it backported for trusty too... no? [13:37] cause cking and I worked on supporting nvme drives in trusty..... [13:38] xnox: that was my next step [13:38] xnox: I got the problem on Trusty & tested the fix there [13:38] ack ;) [13:38] xnox: so the SRU should be trivial [13:39] xnox: it is mostly important for Xenial, since I changed kdump-tools to produce specific initrd files using MODULES=dep [13:39] xnox: but it would be good for trusty too if someone decides to use MODULES=dep [13:54] caribou, ack, prolly will be monday when i do the upload, i've got a lot on my "today" plate === LocutusOfBorg1 is now known as LocutusOfBorg === LocutusOfBorg is now known as LocutusOfBorg1 === LocutusOfBorg1 is now known as LocutusOfBorg [17:56] Wondering if I can get somebody to help with https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1310800 [17:56] Launchpad bug 1310800 in linux (Ubuntu) "056a:0302 Trusty Tahr, kernel 3.13: automatic load of wacom.ko driver cause a "hard" kernel panic" [High,Confirmed] [17:57] I diagnosed the issue and provided a patch to fix it four months ago (comment #23), but nothing seems to have been done with it... [18:04] killertofu: ugg, that was a long time ago. i'll have a look at that [18:04] killertofu, hi. thanks for bringing it up here [18:04] henrix, :-) [18:04] kamal: heh, exactly at the same time :-) [18:05] killertofu, henrix and I are the maintainers for 3.13 and 1.16 ... we'll *both* take an immediate look at that! [18:06] glad to have found you two then! :) [18:13] hey does anyone know if exfat support has reached the kernel yet? [18:37] killertofu, ok, we've got the wacom patch in the pipeline for the next cycles of trusty (3.13) and lts-backport-utopic (3.16) ... i.e. it will likely appear in the kernels that will enter the -proposed channel early next week. [18:39] killertofu, a bot will post a message to bug 1310800 once that kernel is ready for verification testing. thanks again for the heads-up on this. [18:39] bug 1310800 in linux (Ubuntu) "056a:0302 Trusty Tahr, kernel 3.13: automatic load of wacom.ko driver cause a "hard" kernel panic" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1310800 [18:41] kamal: awesome, thanks :) [21:15] all right, lemme tkae a look at the src for bug 1531747 [21:15] bug 1531747 in linux (Ubuntu Xenial) "overlay: mkdir fails if directory exists in lowerdir in a user namespace" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1531747 [22:03] Hi, I want to debug an alsa issue (for the first time) on Xenial Xerus. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Audio/UpgradingAlsa/DKMS seems to be the wrong way - at least I don't see a DKMS package there. Can somebody give me a pointer? [22:11] skoe_: that wiki may be out of date. Have you filed a bug with your current issue? You can use 'ubuntu-bug linux' for example [22:13] It's that one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/1525554 [22:13] Launchpad bug 1525554 in alsa-driver (Ubuntu) "[HP ProBook 470 G3, Intel Skylake HDMI, Digital Out, HDMI] No sound at all" [Undecided,Incomplete] [22:14] But as I'm a software developer anyway I'm interested in looking into it nevertheless. Play a bit with printk and see what happens :) [22:16] skoe_: Well first thing would be to see if this is a regression of sorts then if so, locating the commit(s) that are missing or break it [22:16] skoe_: did this work in 14.04 ? [22:17] The machine is new (xmas). It didn't work on 15.10 neither, but IIRC I didn't try 14.04. [22:17] and can you play with alsamixer to get settings working? it could be bad defaults? [22:17] my skylake machine uses analog out because I haven't 'upgraded' to hdmi yet : ) [22:18] It has no codec when the issue is there. The last it says is [ 145.033347] snd_hda_intel 0000:00:1f.3: no codecs initialized [22:19] Look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/1525554/comments/11 [22:19] Launchpad bug 1525554 in alsa-driver (Ubuntu) "[HP ProBook 470 G3, Intel Skylake HDMI, Digital Out, HDMI] No sound at all" [Undecided,Incomplete] [22:19] skoe_: ok [22:20] i'll point this at somebody who knows more about skylake patches [22:21] Seems like it times out first (...probe error...) and gets a spurious response later (0x14f150f4). [22:22] The same magic number is in the patch for this codec. Seems to be its ID. (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1454656) [22:22] Launchpad bug 1454656 in HWE Next "Add support for Conexant codecs CX20721, CX20722, CX20723 and CX20724" [Undecided,Fix committed] [22:22] Yeah, thanks. I'll stay here and see what happens :) [22:24] skoe_: feel free to ping people here next week about it. good luck [22:25] Thanks, I will