| tsimonq2 | balloons: About the Ubutnu Font Testing I have seen in the MLs, how can I be of assistance? I run Lubuntu Xenial. | 02:20 |
|---|---|---|
| balloons | You should have the font then. Give things a work | 02:23 |
| balloons | whirl* | 02:23 |
| tsimonq2 | balloons: uhh what exactly should I be doing? | 02:23 |
| tsimonq2 | :) | 02:23 |
| tsimonq2 | and how do I make sure I am using the new one? | 02:24 |
| * tsimonq2 wishes there were test cases so he didn't have to bother balloons :P | 02:24 | |
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| === maclin1 is now known as maclin | ||
| === la_juyis` is now known as la_juyis | ||
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| balloons | It should be on the wiki. I guess it's not and that's why you are asking questions? | 14:09 |
| flocculant | balloons: given that there's been no apparent change in ubuntu font version - I'll just carry on pinning the old version until the bugs I reported get fixed | 16:42 |
| flocculant | seems a bit daft for them to ask you to ask people to test things if bugs reported when it changed don't get fixed first *shrug* | 16:43 |
| balloons | flocculant, yes, no new updates. I just never really mentioned it's existance to people | 16:43 |
| flocculant | ok - then bug 1520772 and bug 1525150 :) | 16:44 |
| ubot5 | bug 1520772 in ubuntu-font-family-sources (Ubuntu) "New font uses Arabic-sized figures in Latin contexts" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1520772 | 16:44 |
| ubot5 | bug 1525150 in ubuntu-font-family-sources (Ubuntu) "Ubuntu font missing part of 8 and 3 in hexchat" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1525150 | 16:44 |
| balloons | you were one of like a handful of people who ever gave feedback. They are really really looking for Arabic and non-western feedback as they have the biggest changes. But the font stuff happens differently, so it'll be a bit before we see another update | 16:44 |
| flocculant | yea I assumed as much | 16:44 |
| flocculant | I know it's meh so pinned it :D | 16:45 |
| balloons | You can blame me for not getting more eyeballs on it sooner, heh | 16:45 |
| flocculant | ha ha ha | 16:45 |
| flocculant | balloons: posted to the qa list re the bugs I saw mid-Dec with that font | 16:48 |
| balloons | yes, I remember | 16:48 |
| balloons | it landed just after thanksgiving, and I knew about it early dec | 16:49 |
| balloons | well.. everything was in place early dev | 16:49 |
| flocculant | weirdest one I saw was it refusing to let me use ubuntu light - forced thin on me | 16:49 |
| flocculant | anyway now it's on the qa list we can see if we get more eyes | 16:50 |
| flocculant | balloons: so I found something that needs to be addressed somehow - nothing broken, kind of wishlisty | 22:37 |
| flocculant | if a bug becomes invalid - still shows in tracker, if we have a 'half good' test result listing that invalid bug an admin can remove the bug from the result | 22:38 |
| flocculant | but if someone has written 'sum stuff' and reported that invalid one - but not actually reported the issue which remains - admin fiddling about makes it a good result | 22:39 |
| flocculant | perhaps - looking at how useful gold was for fixed - make an invalid bug icon black ? | 22:40 |
| flocculant | thoughts on that last point? | 22:40 |
| tsimonq2 | +1 flocculant | 22:44 |
| flocculant | I always +1 flocculant | 22:47 |
| flocculant | works for me | 22:47 |
| tsimonq2 | lol | 22:50 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!